- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Week Zero Bowl Games
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:25 am to mike4lsu
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:25 am to mike4lsu
Since this is the 3,456 topic started about bowl games, this is the final truth. Bowl games are going NOWHERE! There is enough interest in the games, and ESPN and other networks would much rather have a bowl game going than some talking heads show. If you don't like them don't watch. Are they like they were in the 80's, 90's, 00's, or even 2010's? No. Will they ever be again? Probably not. They aren't going anywhere.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:40 am to mike4lsu
Just quit bowl games and conference title games and extend the regular season by a week.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:55 am to Ssubba
Yall whine a lot.
I enjoyed the Pop Tart bowl.
Are the bowls polished products on the field anymore? Probably not.
Will I watch the train wrecks. As long as they are close then yes.
I enjoyed the Pop Tart bowl.
Are the bowls polished products on the field anymore? Probably not.
Will I watch the train wrecks. As long as they are close then yes.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 11:14 am to NIH
So again, you are saying that every position except for QB should be able to opt out of bowl games? If Nabers was LSU's "leader" would your opinion change?
Posted on 12/30/24 at 11:37 am to LSBoosie
I think it’s case specific. Don’t be obtuse.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 11:46 am to NIH
So what makes the two situations so different? The only two reasons you've given so far is that Cam is a QB and supposed to be a "leader" and Malik is a WR and not supposed to be a "leader".
Posted on 12/30/24 at 12:29 pm to mike4lsu
quote:
Most prefer to opt out anyways...
The majority of the seniors aren't opting out.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:01 pm to LSBoosie
You just quoted my reasons
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:03 pm to NIH
Ok so you just think that quarterbacks shouldn't opt out of bowl games. Got it. So I assume you believe that Jayden, who was not only a Heisman candidate but a Heisman winner and leader of the team, should not have sat out of last year's bowl game. Both were on the #13 teams in the country so their situations were almost identical, except for the fact that Cam Ward had the opportunity to break an NCAA record.
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:32 pm to LSBoosie
no. I think it’s better if you just don’t play at all.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:36 pm to NIH
Weird stance to take. Not sure if you have a problem with it because it's the quarterback and a leader or because he played half of the game instead of none of the game. You've said both but haven't criticized any LSU players that did the exact same things...
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:29 pm to mike4lsu
Only if they count towards the regular season standings. May as well get rid of bowls altogether.
Popular
Back to top
