- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC and Oklahoma are two examples of why I don't think Wash should make it
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:45 am to dallastiger55
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:45 am to dallastiger55
quote:Heard this about Oklahoma for an entire month before last year's finals. Offensive juggernaut that cannot be stopped...blah blah blah. I'm going to be so pissed if Clemson has to play them for a third time in a row.
OU and USC are two of the top 5 teams in the country right now, anyone who says otherwise is crazy.
0
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:52 am to zzgobucky
In a year like this you hope the committee weighs that. And they should.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:29 pm to TDawg1313
OU is getting in after Washington loses
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:32 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
OU is getting in after Washington loses
Depends on who UW loses to.
If UW loses to WSU, then I could see that. If UW loses to Colorado, then I think Colorado gets in over Oklahoma.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:46 pm to TDawg1313
Washington ain't beating Wazzou
Can't see a scenario where OU is out
Can't see a scenario where OU is out
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:56 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Washington ain't beating Wazzou
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:59 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Can't see a scenario where OU is out
how about the one where washington beats wazzou?
Posted on 11/23/16 at 3:00 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Washington ain't beating Wazzou
Vegas disagrees
quote:
Can't see a scenario where OU is out
This says that Oklahoma has a 28% chance LINK
Posted on 11/23/16 at 3:38 pm to UW1991
I just feel with all these teams 2-10 really close together and all really having an argument for being in the top 4 that SoS should matter. Kinda like college bball. It shouldn't be just how many losses you have.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:20 pm to zzgobucky
quote:
I just feel with all these teams 2-10 really close together and all really having an argument for being in the top 4 that SoS should matter. Kinda like college bball. It shouldn't be just how many losses you have.
Which is why the BCS at 2 was a joke... and the CFP at 4, although better, is still a joke. The further you get away from 1, the less the margin of error. College Football doesn't need a "cinderella" team like NCAA as an 8 team playoff gives legitimate conference champs and a few 'at large' teams an opportunity. Cutting it off at 2 or now at 4 is quite dumb. I guess it creates controversy and discussion all season long.... $$$$
Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:25 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
The further you get away from 1, the less the margin of error. College Football doesn't need a "cinderella" team like NCAA as an 8 team playoff gives legitimate conference champs and a few 'at large' teams an opportunity.
Every year...there's like 8 teams max where the public says...yeah, I'd like to see them have a shot.
Basically, the Top 10...if you can't make it into the Top 10 - you F'd - up during the season and the season should still matter...so you're out.
But out of the Top 5...4 have 1-loss.
How do you differentiate beyond just bias and subjective assumptions? You can't. Spare SOS rankings and CPU bullshite...computers only pump out what you put in...it's still all subjective nonsense.
If we are going to stick to 4 teams...they have to win it on the field...the right to go...Conference Champs...and then make a decision on which conference will get left out.
See...that's unfair too.
More eye-test subjective ESPN ratings bullshite.
Otherwise go to 8...5 Conference champs and 3 at-large.
You get the winners of the major conferences and then you can take your ND or Bama like they would if they both had 3 losses.
This post was edited on 11/23/16 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:29 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Otherwise go to 8...5 Conference champs and 3 at-large.
I would like no more than 6 teams, top 2 get a first round bye. The importance of the regular season is still what separates CFB from other sports.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:33 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
That they lost their first big game
Utah>>>>>USC. Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:35 pm to zzgobucky
If USC didn't have 3 loses you woudl have a point.
I think they shoudl make a point if OSU beats Michigan and doesn't win the Big 10, Win your conference
OSU benefited from that in 2015 when they pumped a very good TCU out of the playoffs.
If PSU gets in the playoffs then Wash should (if they win out) Tough Titties OSU win your division
I think they shoudl make a point if OSU beats Michigan and doesn't win the Big 10, Win your conference
OSU benefited from that in 2015 when they pumped a very good TCU out of the playoffs.
If PSU gets in the playoffs then Wash should (if they win out) Tough Titties OSU win your division
Posted on 11/23/16 at 4:36 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
I would like no more than 6 teams, top 2 get a first round bye. The importance of the regular season is still what separates CFB from other sports.
The regular season is not important. See 2011 and 1993
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News