- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USA Today tried to get Caitlin Clark again
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:31 am to Paul Allen
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:31 am to Paul Allen
quote:
unparalleled comprehensive coverage
Are you aware the year is 2026 and you’re in a thread detailing yet another redaction to a published story from USA Today?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:34 am to John Casey
quote:
but Clark should be participating in everything, IMO, to grow the league, especially this early in her pro career.
The same league that’s openly hostile towards her?
Her only obligation is to her teammates and to use her fame and abilities for good. Which she’s doing through her organization and the MSM immediately tries to characterize her in a negative way.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:59 am to cardswinagain
To think this was once the go to paper for almost every hotel. And their weekend college football edition was a must read for me.
Damn, how times have changed.
Damn, how times have changed.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:00 am to Paul Allen
Because there are still hotels on autopilot just buying their paper. Kind of how CNN gets viewers.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:35 am to Tiger Ugly
quote:
But this reporter apparently just flat out made something up - and should be at the very least suspended without pay with a warning that if this ever happens again you are fired.
What sucks is she got community noted to hell and immediately retracted, which makes a defamation suit difficult at best and likely impossible.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:38 am to lsupride87
Yes she’s likely another white female liberal. And the black women league still openly hates her, bc she’s white.
Congrats, those are your people.
Congrats, those are your people.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:39 am to mdomingue
quote:
And Gannett (which owns USA Today) owns most of the local newspapers in the country (every one in the Lafayette area). They own hundreds of local daily and weekly newspapers (and the associated online/social media accounts) in at least 43 states.
They still aren't as bad as McClatchy. Shame what that moron did to the Sun Herald. (Same thing he did to the Pittsburgh Pirates.)
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:41 am to lurking
quote:
The same league that’s openly hostile towards her? Her only obligation is to her teammates and to use her fame and abilities for good. Which she’s doing through her organization and the MSM immediately tries to characterize her in a negative way
She still has millions of fans that would want to watch her participate in the All Star weekend events.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:48 am to NIH
quote:
They hate her because she’s MAGA af and everyone knows it
Not true at all...
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:50 am to John Casey
quote:
The charity is great and all, but Clark should be participating in everything, IMO, to grow the league, especially this early in her pro career.
Oh frick off with this "grow the league" bullshite. She already does her part to "grow the league" and the other players still physically assault her every night.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:54 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
How is USA Today still in business?
I'd sue for libel and get a restraining order if I was Clark. It's personal with them now.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 3:06 pm to UncleRuckus
quote:
The USA Today is absolute left wing propaganda
All major “news” networks are
Yep, this was the headline on NBC News after the terrorist firebombed the Federal Building in NYC where ICE operates. The consequences for such a blatant lie? Nothing, of course.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:04 pm to Tiger Ugly
quote:
But this reporter apparently just flat out made something up - and should be at the very least suspended without pay with a warning that if this ever happens again you are fired.
She's just doing what she was hired to do.
Popular
Back to top

0








