- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USA 2-0 Mexico GAME
Posted on 2/11/09 at 9:58 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Posted on 2/11/09 at 9:58 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
the mexicans always travel well
Posted on 2/11/09 at 10:02 pm to Tweezy
I knew they'd have a lot, but I'd say it was probably about 65-35 USA, I was thinking it'd be more like 75-25.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 10:04 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
i love the team. just take out ching and dempsey. i dont like clint for some reason
Posted on 2/11/09 at 10:06 pm to Tweezy
I agree. Liked that lineup a lot. I agree, too, to take out Ching, put in Altidore. I like Dempsey, though.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 10:07 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
altidore is so composed and calm out there.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 10:58 pm to crazy4lsu
Ching did a great job in his role, target forward. His job is not to make tons of runs into space, that is for Donovan to do as the off forward. Ching plays a role and does it well. He keeps posession and allows our attacking mids to get forward.
Nobody made a run for Altidore in the 85 minute because IT WAS THE 85 MINUTE and we were up 1 - 0. You train your player on the ball to kill some time while your defense can rest and organize.
Hejduk was great, Pearce just okay. Dos Santos got around him quite a bit. I thought our CM's did a great job of combination in the middle third of the field and Donovan and Bradley did an excellent job of looking to play penetrating passes, particularly Bradley. I though Dempsey was awful, but he rarely got good service.
Great result by the US!
Nobody made a run for Altidore in the 85 minute because IT WAS THE 85 MINUTE and we were up 1 - 0. You train your player on the ball to kill some time while your defense can rest and organize.
Hejduk was great, Pearce just okay. Dos Santos got around him quite a bit. I thought our CM's did a great job of combination in the middle third of the field and Donovan and Bradley did an excellent job of looking to play penetrating passes, particularly Bradley. I though Dempsey was awful, but he rarely got good service.
Great result by the US!
Posted on 2/11/09 at 11:01 pm to keeper007
Ching didn't hold the ball up that well. I understand his role, but he can barely trap a ball. I appreciate his effort and he occasionally does a good job of holding the ball, but he's just not that great of a target man.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 11:06 pm to hendersonshands
I think he gets into channels better than altidore. I agree altidore is a dangerous combination of size and speed, but gives us a bit less posession in the game. If Altidore was playing first team football in a the 1st divison somewhere, then I can see him starting.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 11:12 pm to keeper007
Well, that all comes with experience. The thing is, Jozy can't be subbed in the 80th minute and expected to make a contribution. He's the type of player that needs to find the groove of the game.
Posted on 2/11/09 at 11:26 pm to keeper007
quote:
If Altidore was playing first team football in a the 1st divison somewhere, then I can see him starting
whoa now
he would be starting in the MLS, like ching, if he were in the MLS
you can't criticize him for being good enough to be bought by a solid 1st division team of La Liga. that's ridiculous
Posted on 2/11/09 at 11:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not a big soccer fan but I watched that entire game, it was awesome 
Posted on 2/12/09 at 7:03 am to RebelNutt
quote:
you can't criticize him for being good enough to be bought by a solid 1st division team of La Liga. that's ridiculous
He was bought by them, but loaned out to a second division squad. My problem is not his talent, but his game fitness. Anybody playing on the full national team needs to be playing more than sporadically in the second division in spain.
Posted on 2/12/09 at 7:03 am to keeper007
Wonderful! I thought the game was tonight

Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:17 am to Tweezy
--the mexicans always travel well--
Uh, bro, I hate to tell you this, but the Mexicans have travelled VERY well. Those 40,000 dudes in sombreros didn't fly in from Cancun for this game. They're here already, most of them illegally, in your town.
Uh, bro, I hate to tell you this, but the Mexicans have travelled VERY well. Those 40,000 dudes in sombreros didn't fly in from Cancun for this game. They're here already, most of them illegally, in your town.
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:20 am to keeper007
quote:
Anybody playing on the full national team needs to be playing more than sporadically in the second division in spain.
well great then the MLS all-star team should be our starters and we'll blow. they're the only players guaranteed that kind of playing time b/c well, the MLS isn't a top division
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:44 am to keeper007
Ching spent most of the game, as usual, turning the ball over to the Mexicans. If his role on the team is to make a long touch that gives possession to the defense, then he is great at that role. If that isn't his role, he should be benched.
I'd like to point out that on the corner kick which scored a goal, three players touched the ball. Ching was not only not one of them, he was nowhere near the play. What? Is our only striker on the field as a decoy? Ching is a striker who can't score. That makes him a liability. If we are rolling out a strategy which calls for our striker not to score, well, that's a problem with the system, too.
I'd like to point out that on the corner kick which scored a goal, three players touched the ball. Ching was not only not one of them, he was nowhere near the play. What? Is our only striker on the field as a decoy? Ching is a striker who can't score. That makes him a liability. If we are rolling out a strategy which calls for our striker not to score, well, that's a problem with the system, too.
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:46 am to Baloo
quote:
If we are rolling out a strategy which calls for our striker not to score, well, that's a problem with the system, too.
exactly
but we do have 2 defensive mids!
BRING BACK THE 3-6-1
This post was edited on 2/12/09 at 9:47 am
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:51 am to SlowFlowPro
I'm not saying the MLS starters should be our line up. No way, we would be terrible. I just want to see him keep developing and earning playing time overseas to be far better than Ching in the future. There is a reason Ching plays and i'm sure Bradley sees it in training. I'm not saying Ching is going to be our targer player come 2010, but he isn't as bad as people think.
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:51 am to keeper007
I love what Bradley has done over time. We looked quick in transition and fast in combination in the middle of the field. Much better than what we showed in the England/Spain/Argentina run last year.
Popular
Back to top


2






