Started By
Message

re: Ufc 106: Tito Ortiz vs Forest Griffan

Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:42 pm to
Posted by Charles Bronson
WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS
Member since Nov 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:42 pm to
Apparently the bruise under Ortiz's right eye is from a "cracked skull". (from before the fight)
Posted by lsu223
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
2169 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:42 pm to
Why does Tito always bring up injuries immediately after losses?
Posted by bosoxs45
boston
Member since Mar 2008
2557 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:43 pm to
Griffen won?
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
19166 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:43 pm to
quote:


There's the paid judge.


No shite. I think Forest had two and three but not dominant like that.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
87137 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

30-27 Griffin



bullshite score


Tito talking shite to the fans now and making excuses
Posted by Vood
Member since Dec 2007
8550 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:43 pm to
Because he is a
Posted by Charles Bronson
WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS
Member since Nov 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:44 pm to
Tito was funny after the fight.

I think him being complete dogshit in the 3rd lost that fight for him. I still think he won rounds 1 and 2.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:45 pm to
Forest won his game and either nullified or even won Tito's game. Tito's still a monster, I just don't understand that last round unless he was hurting.
Posted by plaxico
Member since Jun 2009
1157 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

quote:

30-27 Griffin
There's the paid judge.


seriously, i fricking hate tito, but i would've called it 29-27 at its most favorable to forrest
Posted by tigerwoods
Hillman
Member since Jan 2007
3176 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:48 pm to
30-27 isnt all that far fetched. forrest pretty much controlled the whole way
Posted by tigerwoods
Hillman
Member since Jan 2007
3176 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:48 pm to
and i hate forrest
Posted by plaxico
Member since Jun 2009
1157 posts
Posted on 11/21/09 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

30-27 isnt all that far fetched. forrest pretty much controlled the whole way


i think tito got one of the first two, and if he didn't, i would've scored the 3rd 10-8 (30-26), but i'm just glad forrest won; so whatever.
This post was edited on 11/21/09 at 11:55 pm
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 12:05 am to
30-27 is bullshite...frick that

Tito won that round no doubt (round 1)

I thought Tito won it....but none the less.....good fight.....need a 3rd fight..tito shouldn't have coasted last round. I thought he won 1 and 2 though. But can't dispute the decision outside of the 30-27 judge
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466724 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 12:51 am to
quote:

I just don't understand that last round unless he was hurting.

he won rounds 1 and 2

he was avoiding the knockout

this was the worst screw job that i've seen in the UFC
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466724 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 12:52 am to
quote:

30-27 isnt all that far fetched.

yes it is

he didn't come close to winning the 2nd round

he did nothing while tito took him down twice and has some decent gnp
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466724 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 12:52 am to
quote:

i would've scored the 3rd 10-8

why?

forrest didn't connect with anything

tito was playing D and forrest got in a few jabs and light punches
Posted by plaxico
Member since Jun 2009
1157 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 1:25 am to
quote:

tito was playing punching bag


but, i wouldn't be overwhelming adamant for a 10-8, and tito probably gets a -1 from me for being tito

i'd have to watch it again. that was just my first response

forrest obviously did nothing that absolutely warranted a 10-8. a knock-down would've sealed that imo
This post was edited on 11/22/09 at 1:26 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71004 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 1:26 am to
was the fight good?
Posted by plaxico
Member since Jun 2009
1157 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 1:40 am to
yeah, it was pretty good

i would probably watch everything on the main card again but johnson v. kos. it was like johnson v. burns w/a bigger twist
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466724 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 1:45 am to
quote:

forrest obviously did nothing that absolutely warranted a 10-8. a knock-down would've sealed that imo

a 10-8 is reserved for absolute domination that didn't result in a knockout

you people love giving forest the fake 10-8s

when he robbed rampage, there were a ton of you claiming a phantom 10-8 round there also
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram