- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:03 pm to BayouBengals03
And I don't understand the problem with the call. If the refs got it wrong, then the NFL will clearly admit it and apologize on Monday. Just ask Detroit.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:03 pm to Catman88
quote:
You are a dumb arse. fricking Mike Pereira even said himself that it was disputable on the football move. That single statement is all you need to make the ruling on the field stand. You cannot throw away the fact that the ruling was of a completed catch.
so he didn't take this into consideration when saying that it was the correct call? Unless I forgot what he said?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:04 pm to GynoSandberg
Yes.
Do you have disputable evidence that he isn't?
Because if you don't, that call has to stand.
Do you have disputable evidence that he isn't?
Because if you don't, that call has to stand.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:04 pm to GynoSandberg
yes 
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:04 pm to Eighteen
quote:Which he never made.
Not if he makes a football move.
Falling and stumbling isn't a football move. I don't see a reach either.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:04 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
The second he stretches that ball out to the goal line, he is making a football move. At that moment, it is a catch.
False, because he hasn't completed the act of the catch. Imagine this play taking place at the 40 yard line and he is "stretching" for the 39. It is an incomplete pass. You're implying moving the football forward at all constitutes a completion. At what point in his "stretch" is he "stretching" and it becomes a catch? You're saying it is a catch at that point, so exactly what point is that?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
You are a dumb arse. fricking Mike Pereira even said himself that it was disputable on the football move. That single statement is all you need to make the ruling on the field stand. You cannot throw away the fact that the ruling was of a completed catch.
Exactly.
Mike P said this, and Howie Long immediately wanted to call him out for it. I'm guessing his producers told him not to.
If it's disputable whether or not it's a football move, that call HAS to stand.
Mike P is awful, anyway.
quote:
When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground, the "football move" would be: stretching for a first down, diving out-of-bounds or running with the ball. If the "football move" is accomplished, and the receiver is then hit and the ball comes out, it is ruled a catch and fumble, instead of an incomplete forward pass.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Unless I forgot what he said?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm to catholictigerfan
Didn't appear to be so. He stated himself that he wasn't sure. The question they asked him was if it we're a catch. Not if the call should stand. So yea maybe he didn't realize he basically said the ruling should stand.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm to GynoSandberg
Boom
I love being right.
I love being right.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:05 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
False, because he hasn't completed the act of the catch. Imagine this play taking place at the 40 yard line and he is "stretching" for the 39. It is an incomplete pass.
False.
Stretching for a first down is a football move.
A touchdown is a first down.
quote:
When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground, the "football move" would be: stretching for a first down, diving out-of-bounds or running with the ball. If the "football move" is accomplished, and the receiver is then hit and the ball comes out, it is ruled a catch and fumble, instead of an incomplete forward pass.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:06 pm to DelU249
good call
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:06 pm to GynoSandberg
MSB cowtards >>>>> professional NFL refs
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Yes.
Do you have disputable evidence that he isn't?
Yea, he just posted it.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to GynoSandberg
I don't know who that dean guy is but three refs all agreeing with the call.
Sounds like a good call.
Sounds like a good call.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to GynoSandberg
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to GynoSandberg
Wait, so a bunch of NFL referees are going to agree with their co-workers and stick behind them?
They have a union, you know.
They have a union, you know.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to catholictigerfan
he's the VP of officiating
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:07 pm to BayouBengals03
You clearly can't admit when you're wrong, so I will no longer waste my time. But, you are wrong. Tough pill to swallow. It's hard to be a contrarian sometimes.
Page 18 of 47
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News