Started By
Message

re: Tiger found with no alcohol in system at time of arrest, blows .000

Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:22 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Funny the arresting officer said he smelled an odor associated with alcoholic beverages????


no he didn't. the police report is available online. The arresting officer reported no odors according to his report
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7521 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

he has done this to himself and my only concern is that he was lucky enough to not have killed someone driving like that.....



From the article:
quote:

The police had to wake up Tiger Woods


How do you or anyone being overly critical definitively know that he wasn't driving home when meds from his recent surgery kicked and he pulled over to sleep it off?
This post was edited on 5/30/17 at 1:24 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Arresting officer said he smelled alcohol on Tiger's breath

incorrect
quote:

Its another entirely to have an unexpected reaction to medication.

unfortunately, intent is not a defense to a DUI
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

But Tiger refused breath test apparently and that's an arresting offense right there.

also incorrect. Tiger didn't refuse any tests.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

He's a junkie on pain pills

or maybe he just underwent back surgery and took the medication he was prescribed but shouldn't have been driving
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

What the "I" is, is still in question. Whether he purposefully drove under the influence or not is still in question.

the "I" stands for "influence" not "intent." DUI is a strict liability offense. Intent is not an element the state has to prove. It's irrelevant
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:27 pm to
Apparently no one read the arrest report.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:41 pm to
Why was Tiger freaking Woods arrested if he blew a .000. Cops are dicks. Just give him a ride home.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Why was Tiger freaking Woods arrested if he blew a .000. Cops are dicks. Just give him a ride home.

Because he admitted to have taken pain medications that may cause impairment. He also failed his field sobriety test. He was released a couple of hours after he was booked. The cops were not being dicks in this situation. They found a guy that appeared to be intoxicated passed out with the car running at 3 in the morning. The passed out driver then admitted to being unaware of his surroundings, failed a field sobriety test, and admitted to taking pain medications. That's more than enough probable cause for a DUI
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28898 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:


ESPN saying that Jupiter Police will release the dash cam footage later this week. That's gonna be interesting


Based on the police report write-up Tiger was very slurred, sloppy, sleepy and out of it. Gonna be a cringeworthy video for me.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Based on the police report write-up Tiger was very slurred, sloppy, sleepy and out of it. Gonna be a cringeworthy video for me.


When I interned at the DA's office in law school, one of my favorite parts of my day were watching dash cam videos. Watching the dash cam videos during their transport to jail was even better
This post was edited on 5/30/17 at 3:06 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35512 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:00 pm to
quote:


also incorrect. Tiger didn't refuse any tests.


Well then that original article on ESPN was full of lies.

It said Tiger refused breath test at the scene. And smelled of alcohol.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9200 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:06 pm to
Must be xanax. Way too much
Posted by Freezus22
Da Boot
Member since Aug 2016
1609 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

what was he doing out at 3AM?

Does it really matter?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Well then that original article on ESPN was full of lies.

It said Tiger refused breath test at the scene. And smelled of alcohol.



well the police report has been released. many of the initial reports were wrong
LINK

Tiger provided a breath test, a urine sample, and performed field sobriety tests. If you'll also notice, he did not sign the implied consent form, meaning that he complied with all requests
Posted by LSUvegasbombed
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2013
15464 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:10 pm to
the initial reports might spin this back into tiger's favor and make the cops just look like assholes
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

the "I" stands for "influence" not "intent." DUI is a strict liability offense. Intent is not an element the state has to prove. It's irrelevant






funny how people downvote a post out of ignorance. sorry if you don't agree with the law

quote:


316.193 Driving under the influence; penalties.—
(1) A person is guilty of the offense of driving under the influence and is subject to punishment as provided in subsection (2) if the person is driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle within this state and:
(a) The person is under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, or any substance controlled under chapter 893, when affected to the extent that the person’s normal faculties are impaired;
(b) The person has a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood; or
(c) The person has a breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.



Now if one of you downvoters will please point me to the intent factor in the statute. TIA
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30259 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:15 pm to
Cops will definitely lie to say that he had probable cause. I'm sure he assumed by Tigers slurred speech that had been drinking so he put it in the report. I'm not throwing stones at Tiger because I'm not a hypocrite but I know for a fact that cops lie about shite like that. They'll pull you over when they see you leave a bar saying you swerved or didn't use a blinker, stuff like that happens everywhere and every night.
This post was edited on 5/30/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64659 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

the initial reports might spin this back into tiger's favor and make the cops just look like assholes



With the facts in the report, Tiger is in good shape for his lawyers to present a strong defense. My guess is he pleads this down to a reckless driving or public intox. However, Tiger is more worried about the court of public opinion in this situation. I don't think he's too worried about the legal ramifications of a DUI.
Posted by double d
Amarillo by morning
Member since Jun 2004
16423 posts
Posted on 5/30/17 at 2:17 pm to
So the cops will look just like Tiger.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram