- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The playoff committee said difference between 1,2, and 3 is ranked wins
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:15 pm
Then why the frick is Utah ranked ahead of Oklahoma?
And Utah gets in are they saying you can beat shite teams all season and make the playoff?
And Utah gets in are they saying you can beat shite teams all season and make the playoff?
This post was edited on 12/6/19 at 5:15 pm
10
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:16 pm to Mkay 84
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:19 pm to Mkay 84
They’ve clearly “ranked” things to benefit certain teams.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:20 pm to castorinho
Good lort. That resume
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:26 pm to Mkay 84
That’s why I’ve said before the ultimate hypocrisy would be putting OhSt over LSU bc “eye test” and putting OU over Utah bc of “resume” - two different criteria within the top 4
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:28 pm to metallica81788
quote:
That’s why I’ve said before the ultimate hypocrisy would be putting OhSt over LSU bc “eye test” and putting OU over Utah bc of “resume” - two different criteria within the top 4
There doesn't appear to be any consistency at all
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:28 pm to Mkay 84
1,2,3 are all undefeated
Everyone else has a loss, so the criteria is different. I’m not justifying the committee’s rankings, but trying to explain their rationale.
Utah’s loss has looked better as the season has progressed and USC finished the season strong, going 5-1.
Meanwhile, OU has struggled against some average teams, while Utah is dominating similarly ranked teams.
Everyone else has a loss, so the criteria is different. I’m not justifying the committee’s rankings, but trying to explain their rationale.
Utah’s loss has looked better as the season has progressed and USC finished the season strong, going 5-1.
Meanwhile, OU has struggled against some average teams, while Utah is dominating similarly ranked teams.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:33 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
Utah’s loss has looked better as the season has progressed and USC finished the season strong, going 5-1.
Sorry but if you lose to an 8-4 team and your best win is against a 7-5 team then you don't have the resume to be in the playoffs
They don't have a single quality win. Even if they had beaten USC that wouldn't be a quality win
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:34 pm to Mkay 84
The amount of effort you people put into this shite before the season is over is hilarious
When the final 4 match the old BCS rankings identically you will all still bitch and moan
When the final 4 match the old BCS rankings identically you will all still bitch and moan
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:35 pm to YF12
quote:
The amount of effort you people put into this shite before the season is over is hilarious
It's just something to talk about
If the logic makes no sense now it's not very likely it will make sense later either
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:36 pm to YF12
quote:
When the final 4 match the old BCS rankings identically you will all still bitch and moan
Decent possibility LSU will be #1 in BCS projection and #2 in CFP.
But it'll be close.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:39 pm to KosmoCramer
I’m going to go ahead and disagree with you that chalk this weekend leaves the top three as they currently are. You could very well be right, but I don’t think so.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:43 pm to Mkay 84
Quite honestly, if you feel strongly enough that you will very easily win all of your conference games, you schedule high schools for your OOC.
There really isn't any reason not to if you are in a P5 conference.
The OOC wins (against good opponents) only comes into play if you have a loss.
There really isn't any reason not to if you are in a P5 conference.
The OOC wins (against good opponents) only comes into play if you have a loss.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:43 pm to High C
quote:
I’m going to go ahead and disagree with you that chalk this weekend leaves the top three as they currently are. You could very well be right, but I don’t think so.
So you think if chalk holds the top 3 stay the same?
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:44 pm to Powerman
quote:
Sorry but if you lose to an 8-4 team and your best win is against a 7-5 team then you don't have the resume to be in the playoffs
I agree. The committee uses different and shifting criteria for different teams. Sometimes it’s wins, other times it’s quality losses.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:51 pm to castorinho
Clemson's schedule isn't much better.
Two best teams they beat are Wofford in the FCS and Wake Forest
3-9 GA TECH
7-5 TEXAS A&M
5-7 SYRACUSE
7-5 CHARLOTTE
6-6 UNC
6-6 FLORIDA STATE
7-5 LOUISVILLE
6-6 BOSTON COLLEGE
8-4 WOFFORD
4-8 NC STATE
8-4 WAKE FOREST
4-8 SOUTH CAROLINA (Signature win according to Dabo)
Two best teams they beat are Wofford in the FCS and Wake Forest
3-9 GA TECH
7-5 TEXAS A&M
5-7 SYRACUSE
7-5 CHARLOTTE
6-6 UNC
6-6 FLORIDA STATE
7-5 LOUISVILLE
6-6 BOSTON COLLEGE
8-4 WOFFORD
4-8 NC STATE
8-4 WAKE FOREST
4-8 SOUTH CAROLINA (Signature win according to Dabo)
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:52 pm to castorinho
This is not a playoff resume.
I would argue that they should not get in even with a win tonight even if LSU loses.
No way that resume with a win over Oregon beats Baylor/Wisconsin/Oklahoma if they all win.
I would argue that they should not get in even with a win tonight even if LSU loses.
No way that resume with a win over Oregon beats Baylor/Wisconsin/Oklahoma if they all win.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:52 pm to YF12
quote:
you people
Posted on 12/6/19 at 5:55 pm to crazyatthecamp
quote:
This is not a playoff resume.
Clemson's isn't either.
Based on schedule alone, Clemson just as well be a group of 5 team with the schedule they've played.
Teams like Memphis, Cinci and Boise (and UCF in years past) don't get looked at because they play no one. Clemson is basically any of those teams, except they are considered to be part of a P5 conference.
I can't wait for LSU to arse frick Dabo.
Posted on 12/6/19 at 6:09 pm to dcrews
quote:
I can't wait for LSU to arse frick Dabo.
Please let this happen.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News