- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:26 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
Texas leads OU 63-50-5.
OU holds the lead over the last 75 games, 39-35-3.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:26 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
Which has nothing to do with the fact that national titles were mythical until the BCS.
Which has nothing to do with the fact that BAMA has elevated and separated itself in football as the Gold Standard since the 1920s.
Whatever the rules of engagement, thems the rules.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:27 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
No surprise a Bama fan thinks mythical polls matter more than what actually happens on the field.
Bama has the on-the-field record to back it up too.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:27 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
OU holds the lead over the last 75 games, 39-35-3.
And we lead UGA 40-34-1 over the past 75 games, what's your point? All-time means all-time.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:28 pm to bamameister
quote:
Which has nothing to do with the fact that BAMA has elevated and separated itself in football as the Gold Standard since the 1920s.
Whatever the rules of engagement, thems the rules.
So you finally agree that natties were mythical before the BCS. Thanks.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:28 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Bama has the on-the-field record to back it up too.
They certainly do. He was claiming that natties aren't mythical though and we should all recognize Bama's 1941 claim because some newspaper gave them a trophy.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:30 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
So you finally agree that natties were mythical before the BCS. Thanks.
College football has always been a beauty contest. And when the last 4 teams were selected for this year's playoff, it was still a beauty contest.
But then, thems the rules.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:30 pm to bamameister
So you do agree.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:33 pm to mule74
quote:
These three teams are still relevant. Are they dominant? No. But certainly still relevant.
LSU fans on this website live in a "what have you done for me lately" world.
OU made the playoffs in 2019, the last year LSU did. Notre Dame has made the playoffs more recently than LSU. SC finished ranked higher than LSU this season.
Is that not relevance?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:34 pm to bamameister
quote:
Which has nothing to do with the fact that BAMA has elevated and separated itself in football as the Gold Standard since the 1920s.
Whatever the rules of engagement, thems the rules.
No one has argued against Bama's blue blood status.
Let it go.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:35 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
And we lead UGA 40-34-1 over the past 75 games, what's your point? All-time means all-time.
I think a big reason for OU's inclusion as a "blue blood" is their consistent, high level success since Bud Wilkinson. Outside of "wander through the desert" in the 1990s, they've been at or near the top of college football for 70 seasons.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:35 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
No one has argued against Bama's blue blood status.
Let it go.
The dude is going full strawmen just because people don't recognize their 1941 claim.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:35 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
He was claiming that natties aren't mythical though and we should all recognize Bama's 1941 claim because some newspaper gave them a trophy.
Oh, well that's ridiculous.
Bama has enough real championships to where they can ignore that one.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:36 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
I think a big reason for OU's inclusion as a "blue blood" is their consistent, high level success since Bud Wilkinson. Outside of "wander through the desert" in the 1990s, they've been at or near the top of college football for 70 seasons.
I never said they weren't a blue blood.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:37 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
I never said they weren't a blue blood.
That's true.
I assumed you were claiming Tejas should be included as a blue blood based on that fact.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:38 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
That was the old divisional setup before they realigned.
And 12-0 Ohio Stat couldn't play in the CCG.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:38 pm to Tornado Alley
Texas is a blue blood.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:39 pm to GoGators1995
Where do you put Penn State in the pantheon of all-time great programs?
I don't think they played a murderer's row for much of their history, and that's reflected in their poll rankings (they have gone undefeated 12 times and claim just two titles).
But the wins and achievements are there.
I don't think they played a murderer's row for much of their history, and that's reflected in their poll rankings (they have gone undefeated 12 times and claim just two titles).
But the wins and achievements are there.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:41 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
Texas is a blue blood.
I disagree. I think they're a step down from Bama, SC, ND, OU, and Ohio State.
Page 7 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News