- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
That’s fricking horrendous
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
He was was a runner, defender led with the shoulder….and both feet stayed on the ground while he hit the runner.
Pussy arse bullshite, may as well make this flag football
Pussy arse bullshite, may as well make this flag football
3
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to infantry1026
I don't understand what they expect the defender to do in that case.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:46 pm to supadave3
Me either, that was a textbook fricking tackle
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:46 pm to infantry1026
it’s just random bad luck added in for extra chaos into the college game
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to supadave3
It’s beyond time to let the refs judge intent. It’s so obvious when a defender is out of line with a legit target of the head or neck area.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:50 pm to supadave3
I didn’t think the hit on Stockton after his pass should have been targeting……but if this was targeting, that hit on Stockton was DEFINITELY targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:51 pm to infantry1026
That rule needs to change. If you still want to throw a personal foul and penalize them 15 yards then fine, but there is no reason they should kick kids out of games for legit hits.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:52 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
It’s beyond time to let the refs judge intent. It’s so obvious when a defender is out of line with a legit target of the head or neck area.
I agree. The ambiguity would lead to calls being questioned, but there has to be a change. I think the judging indent or unavoidable hits have to be considered
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:02 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:would 100% be worse. Not even debatable.
the refs judge intent.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:17 pm to castorinho
quote:I’ve thought so much about it and strongly want to believe that. But shite man it can’t get worse and it would absolutely clean up a shite ton of ridiculous calls around the margins.
would 100% be worse. Not even debatable.
I do get that there has to be a rule to point to in order to keep ceiling on outrage at a manageable level. But I’d like to see it attempted.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News