- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tech/ULM football series
Posted on 8/25/09 at 3:51 pm to The Easter Bunny
Posted on 8/25/09 at 3:51 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
quote:
Is it really just LA TECH????
Louisiana Tech University
not like Georgia Institute of Technology
It's not Louisiana Technology University or Louisiana Institute of Technology? Why?
Oh well, it's not like we all didn't already know that La. Tech (3rd Tier) is on the "Texas Tech (also just "Tech"/3rd Tier) side" of the spectrum...
...looking enviously down at Ga. Tech.(#35), Va. Tech(#71), Cal Tech(#4), and of course MIT(#4) (all use "Technology"). 2010 U.S. News & World Report Rankings
This post was edited on 8/25/09 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 8/25/09 at 3:53 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:(Don't know if you're joking.)
Does NLU ever play grambling? That would put fannies in the seats
They played last season, I believe, and it set a Malone Stadium attendance record.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 3:54 pm to threeputt
Louisiana Tech was first instituted as the Industrial Institute and College of Louisiana in 1894, then as Louisiana Polytechnic Institute in 1921, and finally as Louisiana Tech University in 1970.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 3:54 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
and finally as Louisiana Tech University in 1970.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 4:18 pm to xiv
bullshite, Turbo. NLU won 9 of 12 from 1978 to 1989. LINK
Tech then spanked NLU twice and pussed out of the series. They then proceeded to suck donkey balls for four years, during which NLU was consistently a top ten 1AA team. Plain and simple, Tech didn't want to lose repeatedly to a 1AA team.
"Then NLU moves up and has a better 1A record than Tech for three years. Tech finally felt comfortable resuming the series once they were decent again (under Crowton).
No two ways about it; they're a bunch of pussies. And the only way to prove me wrong is on the field. First at the Joe, then at the Jim. There's no other way." - xiv
Man, you are wrong. Northeast did not win 9/12 games between 78-89. Tech bought out the last game of the series because they were playing 1A and Northeast was not. That game was scheduled to be played in Monroe and it is totally reasonable that a 1A team would not play a 1AA on the road. Those are facts. Actually, Tech won in '88, '89, '90 and '91 and then won every game between the schools since then. I beleive those were '97-'01, but I'm not sure. I do know the series was resumed as soon as possible after Northeast moved to 1A, but it took a few years due to scheduling conflicts. Northeast did not support the series upon its renewal and a business decision was made to not renew at that time. You can say Tech was scared, yada, yada, yada, but the facts are that Tech moved in a different direction in an attempt to improve. You can argue whatever you want but those are the facts. You can argue Tech's success however you choose but you can't logically defend a stance that an institution shouldn't try to improve. Tech offerred to play ULM but ULM refused. Had ULM accepted and actually support the game, maybe a home/home arrangement would be made. Based on ULM's lack of support the last series, it is reasonable that in today's financial landscape, neither school can afford a home/home OOC series that is not supported. Apparently, ULM lacks the confidence that their fans will support a game and is unwilling to do what is necessary to show a resumption of the series would be financially beneficial to both parties.
Tech then spanked NLU twice and pussed out of the series. They then proceeded to suck donkey balls for four years, during which NLU was consistently a top ten 1AA team. Plain and simple, Tech didn't want to lose repeatedly to a 1AA team.
"Then NLU moves up and has a better 1A record than Tech for three years. Tech finally felt comfortable resuming the series once they were decent again (under Crowton).
No two ways about it; they're a bunch of pussies. And the only way to prove me wrong is on the field. First at the Joe, then at the Jim. There's no other way." - xiv
Man, you are wrong. Northeast did not win 9/12 games between 78-89. Tech bought out the last game of the series because they were playing 1A and Northeast was not. That game was scheduled to be played in Monroe and it is totally reasonable that a 1A team would not play a 1AA on the road. Those are facts. Actually, Tech won in '88, '89, '90 and '91 and then won every game between the schools since then. I beleive those were '97-'01, but I'm not sure. I do know the series was resumed as soon as possible after Northeast moved to 1A, but it took a few years due to scheduling conflicts. Northeast did not support the series upon its renewal and a business decision was made to not renew at that time. You can say Tech was scared, yada, yada, yada, but the facts are that Tech moved in a different direction in an attempt to improve. You can argue whatever you want but those are the facts. You can argue Tech's success however you choose but you can't logically defend a stance that an institution shouldn't try to improve. Tech offerred to play ULM but ULM refused. Had ULM accepted and actually support the game, maybe a home/home arrangement would be made. Based on ULM's lack of support the last series, it is reasonable that in today's financial landscape, neither school can afford a home/home OOC series that is not supported. Apparently, ULM lacks the confidence that their fans will support a game and is unwilling to do what is necessary to show a resumption of the series would be financially beneficial to both parties.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 4:25 pm to LSUFanNTX
It was Louisiana Polytechnic Institute and was renamed Louisiana Tech University in the '60s I beleive. It has always been called Louisiana Tech even though that was not its correct name (much like Georgia Tech).
Tech was founded as a four year engineering college in 1894.
Tech was founded as a four year engineering college in 1894.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 5:36 pm to barney fife
We have Louisiana Tech in the Blue corner and Louisiana-Monroe in the Red corner.
LETS GET IT ON!!!
LETS GET IT ON!!!
Posted on 8/25/09 at 5:44 pm to barney fife
quote:Yes they did. Check out the link.
Man, you are wrong. Northeast did not win 9/12 games between 78-89
quote:If you and I fight 12 times, and you win 9 out of 12, and then you challenge me to another fight, and I run away, I'm going in a different direction.
You can say Tech was scared, yada, yada, yada, but the facts are that Tech moved in a different direction in an attempt to improve.
Tech. Is. Scared.
While some of your story is factually correct, the fact now is that Tech is afraid of a consistent home/away with its two historically most significant FBS rivals (ULL/ULM). Why? A combination of elitism fueled by the fear of not being quite as big and bad as they'd hoped.
When Tech went 1A, I'm sure they had bowl games and conference titles in mind, and even a consistent top 25 program. After a few 77-0 losses, some still believe it's actually going to happen. It isn't. Tech simply doesn't know their place, and that place is at Malone Stadium once every two years.
quote:bullshite point. The only time a significant amount of people didn't show up for that game was when they were a combined 3-17 going into the game. If the teams are mediocre, there will be at least 25,000 at the game. You can bank on that.
Based on ULM's lack of support the last series,
Posted on 8/25/09 at 6:09 pm to xiv
Ok, from the time that ULM joined D1-A, list every season they were over .500.
GO!
Point being. Why would La Tech schedule ULM if they don't need to. I mean, ULM has to play games vs. Arky in Little Rock, then forfeit the gate just to stay in D1 attendance levels. I don't exactly see anyone willing to play ULM in a home and home. Much less an SEC home/home like the one LT got.
ULM though they have a nice field turf at their stadium, is a nobody, that no one outside of Louisiana cares/knows about. La Tech, though not great by any stretch of the imagination, is a better known quantity outside of La.
ETA- LSU will play ULL, Tulane and LT yet even they don't want any of ULM's stank!
GO!
Point being. Why would La Tech schedule ULM if they don't need to. I mean, ULM has to play games vs. Arky in Little Rock, then forfeit the gate just to stay in D1 attendance levels. I don't exactly see anyone willing to play ULM in a home and home. Much less an SEC home/home like the one LT got.
ULM though they have a nice field turf at their stadium, is a nobody, that no one outside of Louisiana cares/knows about. La Tech, though not great by any stretch of the imagination, is a better known quantity outside of La.
ETA- LSU will play ULL, Tulane and LT yet even they don't want any of ULM's stank!
This post was edited on 8/25/09 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 8/25/09 at 6:29 pm to SM6
quote:Georgia doesn't need to schedule Georgia Tech. Clemson doesn't need to schedule South Carolina. Notre Dame doesn't need to schedule Southern California. Lehigh doesn't have to schedule Lafayette. William & Mary doesn't need to schedule Richmond. etc etc etc...
Why would La Tech schedule ULM if they don't need to.
Why would La Tech refuse a home/home with ULM if they don't need to?
Fear. Elitism.
quote:Minnesota?
I don't exactly see anyone willing to play ULM in a home and home. Much less an SEC home/home like the one LT got.
quote:
ULM though they have a nice field turf at their stadium, is a nobody, that no one outside of Louisiana cares/knows about. La Tech, though not great by any stretch of the imagination, is a better known quantity outside of La.
quote:That point is just about as good as this one: LSU has played two home games in Monroe, on ULM's campus. How many games on LT's campus has LSU ever played?
ETA- LSU will play ULL, Tulane and LT yet even they don't want any of ULM's stank!
One shitty point deserves another. And LSU has played ULM anyway.
Tech = Pussies!
Posted on 8/25/09 at 6:30 pm to SM6
quote:
ETA- LSU will play ULL, Tulane and LT yet even they don't want any of ULM's stank!
Not sure if this statement is true. Sounds good to you I guess. I'm pretty sure if you go look back at the scores since LSU started playing the state schools in 2001 (I think), ULM probably played them the best. In 2003 I believe it was like 42-7, but only 14-0 at the half. Much better than LTU or ULL has done.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 6:34 pm to LSULM FAN
FYI, the series is split since 1978. It's 9-9. Sounds like somebody backed out at exactly the right time! Smart move, Tech.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 6:47 pm to xiv
To all the LTU fans and others supporting their case:
Have you ever heard the expression, Perception is Real.
My point is people believe what they believe not matter what the facts are. The perception to many ULM fans and others is that LTU has an elitist attitude and thinks they are too good to play ULM.
Every year my dad brings up something he read in The News-star (Monroe Paper) in the early 90s, where one of the football players made a statement like, "We're going to work on our swagger this week." Or something like that. That maybe doesn't sound bad to some of you, but when you add it to all of the other BS that comes from LTU, it starts to get old.
Have you ever heard the expression, Perception is Real.
My point is people believe what they believe not matter what the facts are. The perception to many ULM fans and others is that LTU has an elitist attitude and thinks they are too good to play ULM.
Every year my dad brings up something he read in The News-star (Monroe Paper) in the early 90s, where one of the football players made a statement like, "We're going to work on our swagger this week." Or something like that. That maybe doesn't sound bad to some of you, but when you add it to all of the other BS that comes from LTU, it starts to get old.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 7:26 pm to LSULM FAN
Louisiana Tech saying "We're better than you" to ULM is like one midget saying "I'm taller than you" to a slightly shorter midget. Nobody cares unless they fight each other.
Get on the field, Tech! No crafty business deals. One year at the Joe, one at the Jim. Rinse and repeat. Nobody gives a shite about your program, and they never will. Treat the fans to what they want.
Get on the field, Tech! No crafty business deals. One year at the Joe, one at the Jim. Rinse and repeat. Nobody gives a shite about your program, and they never will. Treat the fans to what they want.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 7:32 pm to xiv
If Tech doesn't want to come to Monroe, restart the old State Fair Game. Independence Stadium should hold all of those Tech fans.
Posted on 8/25/09 at 7:45 pm to LSUFanNTX
Ah didn't realize LSU beat ULM in 2003.
Fact of the matter is that both La Tech and ULm are national after thoughts. However ULM is laughable because it's administration, both academic and athletic have no plan and no direction. Plus Charlie Weatherbie is a freaking joke.
I don't have a connection to LT, but I think that the ULM fans are delusional if they feel that they matter. LT doesn't need ULM. They are a 500+ team that plays in bowl games (google it if you are unfamiliar with the concept).
Oh yea, answer my original question.
LIST THE .500+ SEASONS ULM HAS HAD SINCE PLAYING D1-A
Fact of the matter is that both La Tech and ULm are national after thoughts. However ULM is laughable because it's administration, both academic and athletic have no plan and no direction. Plus Charlie Weatherbie is a freaking joke.
I don't have a connection to LT, but I think that the ULM fans are delusional if they feel that they matter. LT doesn't need ULM. They are a 500+ team that plays in bowl games (google it if you are unfamiliar with the concept).
Oh yea, answer my original question.
LIST THE .500+ SEASONS ULM HAS HAD SINCE PLAYING D1-A
This post was edited on 8/25/09 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 8/25/09 at 7:51 pm to SM6
LIST THE .500+ SEASONS ULM HAS HAD SINCE PLAYING D1-A
2007 ULM was 6-6
2007 ULM was 6-6
Posted on 8/25/09 at 10:08 pm to SM6
quote:
Fact of the matter is that both La Tech and ULm are national after thoughts.
I agree with you here. But this topic has nothing to do with national perceptions. It is about the 35 mile distance from ULM to LTU and the fans of both schools.
quote:
However ULM is laughable because it's administration, both academic and athletic have no plan and no direction. Plus Charlie Weatherbie is a freaking joke.
100% agree with you here too, except for the academic part. The admin IMO is the single biggest factor holding ULM Athletics back. No plan whatsoever. Charlie will most likely be gone after this year. A winning season and bowl birth probably won't save him. It's his final year on contract and he's been working for next to nothing most of the time he's been there.
quote:
ULM fans are delusional if they feel that they matter
No delusion here. I know exactly where we are and where we will continue to head if serious changes in staff and philosophy aren't made.
quote:
LT doesn't need ULM.
It may not seem that way because LTU is coming off a winning season and bowl win, but that is not the norm in Ruston as much as they would like you to believe. Both schools need each other more than anyone will admit, especially in Ruston.
Posted on 8/26/09 at 6:26 am to LSULM FAN
quote:
Every year my dad brings up something he read in The News-star (Monroe Paper) in the early 90s
WTF?
Popular
Back to top


0




