Started By
Message

re: Sporting News Top 20 CFB Teams of All-Time

Posted on 8/16/26 at 11:26 pm to
Posted by Dr Rosenrosen
Member since May 2006
4395 posts
Posted on 8/16/26 at 11:26 pm to
I’d make the argument 2008 SC was better than 05

Definitely. The 2008 USC team had one bad half the entire season. USC never got the BCS breaks, having to go undefeated in 2004 and 2005 to get into the title game. The SEC, OU and Ohio State always got the BCS breaks.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5924 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Both 2011 LSU and Alabama have almost always been underrated in these discussions. Either team could hang with or beat just about any team on that list. Suffocating defenses that could single-handedly take over games.

They also took turns running into the teeth of each other’s defensive strength in a year without a Cam Newton or Percy Harvin type running around the SEC to cause problems.

Heavy formations with limited passing ability is the worst thing you can do against hyper physical defenses. When you have superior physicality, you can still score 40-50+ regularly - as those teams did. But when you don’t, you get one combined TD in 8+ quarters of play.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19373 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 11:36 am to
quote:

What? I’ve never even heard any SC fan say this. The ’05 offense was better, but it was basically the same crew as the ’04 team, just with more experience. The difference was the defenses. The ’04 defense was dominant, #1 in the country in rushing defense, # 2 in scoring defense, and #5 in total defense. The ’05 defense was decent, but in the same categories I listed for the ’04 team, the ’05 team ranked 31st, 28th, and 46th, respectively. You can even throw in their 71st ranked pass defense that year.

Another example, in the most important drive of the season, Texas’ game winning one in the Rose Bowl, the Ting twins were on the field trying to help protect the SC lead. Those dudes would have never seen the field in ‘04.
Literally every USC fan and the media as a whole said 05 was better until they lost to Texas

Comparing stats is stupid. 05 USC played like 7 of the top 12 offenses in the nation.

Cal ASU Fresno Oregon ND UCLA and obviously Texas were all averaging like 40ppg. WSU and Hawaii averaged around 35.

04 USC is 1 of the least dominant undefeated teams having close games vs Stanford Oregon St UCLA Cal and VT. 05 was way more dominant.
Posted by boston vol
Lexington-Fayette, KY
Member since Sep 2015
7183 posts
Posted on 8/17/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

04 USC is 1 of the least dominant undefeated teams

That’s because the offense wasn’t what it was in ‘05, especially early in the season. The defense is what got them through the regular season undefeated. And no, every USC fan didn’t say they were better, They knew the defense was a major issue. Again, the ‘04 team was a better all around team, that’s not really even debatable.
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10595 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

One of those wins was against a Trevor Lawrence-led Clemson team that had 10 wins. They beat them by three touchdowns.

I never said they weren’t a very good team. I said the reasons LSU 2019 would be ranked higher are very obvious.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5924 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:

I never said they weren’t a very good team. I said the reasons LSU 2019 would be ranked higher are very obvious.

I think people spend too much mental energy comparing numbers instead of evaluating personnel, strengths and weaknesses, and matchups.

If all the teams since 1970 (accounting for physical differences between eras) were put into a tournament - which would take about 15 games to play out - the teams most likely to win it would exhibit at least one of three characteristics:

1. Great overall roster balance with no obvious personnel liabilities. There’s no Tiny Tim out there waiting to get exposed against the wrong team. Every position group can at least hold its own against top competition.

2. Excellent QB play. The player at the most important position can’t just be along for the ride with a talented team. He needs to be a baller himself with the arm talent of a first round draft pick. Being a running threat too is advantageous, but the ability to stretch the field vertically with great QB and/or WR play and force the defense to defend every blade of grass is paramount.

You’re not going to consistently score a bunch of points against great defenses on a compressed field.

3. Studly defensive front. Going to be hard to at least slow down the great offenses without some dudes up front to control the running game and get after the QB.

If your roster has some deficiencies, you must have an A+ passing game or an A+ defense to still have a chance against a series of all-time great opponents.
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 11:30 am
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33886 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 12:43 pm to
I agree
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram