- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So You Want A College Football Playoff?
Posted on 10/18/10 at 6:59 pm to SaltyTiger53
Posted on 10/18/10 at 6:59 pm to SaltyTiger53
quote:
Sunday since there's a playoff system that "killed the regular season"!
There has been 1 game in the history of the franchise of the Saints that I have been close to as excited as I am for every LSU game. It was in February of last year.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:00 pm to chilge1
Just you, chief. Most people are for a playoff.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:00 pm to Dead Mike
MLB is the worst example. The regular season has to be the most POINTLESS thing in professional sports for the MLB.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:03 pm to geauxbrown
quote:no
So You Want A College Football Playoff?
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I'm a Tiger fan regardless. Baseball
Has a playoff and I go to every game.
If there is a playoff i will be just as much of a fan as ever. If you base your enthusiasm for the Tigers off of the lack of a playoff system or on the current BCS system, then I
would venture to say that you aren't a true fan
Has a playoff and I go to every game.
If there is a playoff i will be just as much of a fan as ever. If you base your enthusiasm for the Tigers off of the lack of a playoff system or on the current BCS system, then I
would venture to say that you aren't a true fan
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:25 pm to baytiger
Eh...ever heard of March Madness?
An 8 team playoff is the way to go...with conference champs only and homefield advantage. Plenty of incentive in that format.
An 8 team playoff is the way to go...with conference champs only and homefield advantage. Plenty of incentive in that format.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:50 pm to SaltyTiger53
There is a book titled "death to the bcs" that is out or coming out that illustrates the unfairness of the system in it's present form.
It looks into the finances behind everything and it argues that the best and most economical scenario is a 16 team playoff with home field advantages for incentives. Says playoff could generate over $750 mill.
I think having only TCU and Boise as only undefeateds and having neither of them make the championship game would be great. Then that may be the push we need to get a playoff.
It looks into the finances behind everything and it argues that the best and most economical scenario is a 16 team playoff with home field advantages for incentives. Says playoff could generate over $750 mill.
I think having only TCU and Boise as only undefeateds and having neither of them make the championship game would be great. Then that may be the push we need to get a playoff.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:52 pm to 0jersey
Playoffs would ruin the regular season???
What a joke!
Posted on 10/18/10 at 7:52 pm to geauxbrown
Every game is a play off, that is what makes college football so much fun.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just you, chief. Most people are for a playoff.
actually, most people are just lemmings who swallowed all the tripe they heard on ESPN and on sports talk radio over the last ten or so years.
i recall reading an article in athlon's or lindy's preseason magazine around 1982-83 about a few coaches supporting a playoff. at the time, as an 11 YEAR OLD, i thought, wow a playoff would be cool.
the idea really kinda died for a while until the mid 90s when through talk radio and espn it picked up a lot of steam.
it got to the point 4-5 years ago where there was not a single voice that opposed to the playoff. but now, as evidenced by musterburger and herbstreet on the abc postgame last week, more and more are starting to say 'not so fast' to a playoff.
in all honesty, them doing it is probably borne out of the same desire to get people talking about the controversy as the whole playoff system thing was done in the first place.
i consider myself a pretty big football fan. but in all honesty sometimes when i watch the saints i am more concerned with the game being close so i can get points on my 'fantasy' team than i am with the saints winning. heck, the team can lose six games and still make the playoffs.
as someone else said, he can only think of one saints game that 'mattered' in the last 40 or so years. i vaguely remember that the saints beat tampa in 87 to clinch their first playoff berth, but other than that few if any NFL regular season games are memorable.
i started watching college football last saturday at 1130 am and didn't stop until past 1 am. i really cared about oregon state vs. washington cause it meant something.
there are SOOOOO many reasons why a larger college football playoff won't exactly work...i say larger cause we have a two-team playoff already. but the fact is, it isn't NEEDED. college football is the greatest sport in the country. period.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The BCS is the greatest thing to ever happen to football, and it's not even close.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:17 pm to AlxTgr
I think the only way to squash the BCS is to have Boise st. (the american media darling) make it to the title game and getting absolutely hammered by Bama, Oklahoma, Oregon, etc. This way the argument can be made that just b/c you go undefeated, if you play a weak arse JV schedule and play in a crap conf. that you don't deserve a shot in the game. Thus, it would make it unfair for all the "cinderella" types as they would be continued to be left out due to their conference strength. Hopefully they would make enough noise to get a playoff with the backing of others.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:19 pm to geauxbrown
The Big 10 and Pac 10 voted against a playoff.
They have it in their contract that they get to have the Rose Bowl for their champs , so no one can touch that piece.
It pays the most. its about money.
If you had the current bowls plugged into the playoff system, it would work for all the rest of the bowls, but not the Rose Bowl.
I dont see the comment that it would wreck the regular season.
If you have an 8 team playoff, nothing much has to change.
the four GAMES would play in current bowls. Then the 4 semi finalists would play in Jerry World and Indy or Mich bowl. Then the champ game would happen. That's 7 big bowls.
That gets JerryWorld-Cotton back into the big bowl rotation, along with Sugar, Fiesta, Rose, Orange and how about Georgia Dome and Indy dome and the pizza dome or whatever they call the Michigan dome. That's 8 big venues for 7 games.
They have it in their contract that they get to have the Rose Bowl for their champs , so no one can touch that piece.
It pays the most. its about money.
If you had the current bowls plugged into the playoff system, it would work for all the rest of the bowls, but not the Rose Bowl.
I dont see the comment that it would wreck the regular season.
If you have an 8 team playoff, nothing much has to change.
the four GAMES would play in current bowls. Then the 4 semi finalists would play in Jerry World and Indy or Mich bowl. Then the champ game would happen. That's 7 big bowls.
That gets JerryWorld-Cotton back into the big bowl rotation, along with Sugar, Fiesta, Rose, Orange and how about Georgia Dome and Indy dome and the pizza dome or whatever they call the Michigan dome. That's 8 big venues for 7 games.
This post was edited on 10/18/10 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:21 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The BCS is the greatest thing to ever happen to football, and it's not even close
the part of the bcs that matches 1 vs 2 is a great idea.
it does miss sometimes one who the 'two best teams' are....see the wore chickuns being left out in 2004 (should have gone over OU), usc left out in 2003 (again, should have gone over OU) and ohio state getting a bid in 07 when Oklahoma and Georgia were more deserving...but most of the time it gets it close to right and it is a lot better than the old make the bowl matchups in october of the past.
now, the one area i think the BCS could improve upon is to change the restrictions on the other bowl slots (ie allow more than 2 teams per conference, if all in top 10) and also work to create better 'matchups'. nobody wanted TCU-boise last year...we all wanted to see what those schools would do against the big boys.
course, money is at the root of it, so that's unlikely to change
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:28 pm to TheFunkyMonkey
quote:
I think the only way to squash the BCS is to have Boise st. (the american media darling) make it to the title game and getting absolutely hammered by Bama, Oklahoma, Oregon, etc
Actually i think this would do the BCS good in the long term...we wouldn't hear about the mid majors in the BCS conversation for quite a while.
A Boise/TCU BCSNCG would be a ratings disaster and would likely bring drastic change
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:40 pm to Dobermann
quote:
Actually i think this would do the BCS good in the long term...we wouldn't hear about the mid majors in the BCS conversation for quite a while.
This is correct.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:50 pm to Common sence
Yes. Plus, I think the current system actually crowns s better champion than many playoff- based systems do. Does the best team win March Madness? I'd say not. The current BCS that takes into account the body of work of the whole season is better IMO.
Now in an ideal world I'd have no polls of any type until week 5. Then do like is done now except expand the BCS championship to a 4 team deal. 1v4 and 2v3. Then a final game. So I guess I do favor a playoff of sorts. But any more than 4 teams ruins it.
Now in an ideal world I'd have no polls of any type until week 5. Then do like is done now except expand the BCS championship to a 4 team deal. 1v4 and 2v3. Then a final game. So I guess I do favor a playoff of sorts. But any more than 4 teams ruins it.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:53 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The BCS is the greatest thing to ever happen to football, and it's not even close.
You would be wrong. Not even close...
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
An 8 team playoff is the way to go. All 8 chosen by the BCS formula. This conference champs bullshite does not fly. Is there a team in the Big East this year that deserves to make a playoff? Hell no. Top 8 regardless of conference. IMO the SEC has had the two best teams in the nation at least 7 out of the last 10 years. Letting just the conference champs and 2 mid major at large teams in would be absurd.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:21 pm to chilge1
quote:
A playoff system will kill the regular season
someone should tell that to the most successful sporting league in the country, the NFL.
The idea that regular season college football is so awesome is a farce in its own right. Most years LSU might play 5 or 6 meaningful games. Half the games are cupcakes againt some directional school or a cellar team from the SEC. And we play in the best conference in the nation!
If there was an 8 team payoff you still couldnt lose more than 1 game most years. And we've already seen a 2 loss national champion anyway.
Getting to see 2 or 3 good games a year in tiger stadium is fun and all, but i think hosting a texas, USC, Ohio St, Miami, Oregon in a quarterfinal/semifinal matchup would be epic.
To say nothing of the money the schools miss out on by exporting their most desired product(post season football).
This post was edited on 10/18/10 at 9:23 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







