- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:15 pm to lsuguy84
quote:ew
20. James Harden 23.27
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:17 pm to Boomshockalocka
Are you gonna provide us any links or evidence that supports these massive claims of all-time seasons related to the Rockets and Harden? Appears all you’re relying on is WS/48 and turnover %.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:18 pm to ReauxlTide222
I think it’s hilarious Westbrook is ahead of Harden and Hakeem in career PER. Dude hates him some Westbrook
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:18 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
How many 70 win teams have there been?
Doesn't matter.. This Rocket team will NOT win 70.. And still are A notch or two behind the Spurs and Warriors/........
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:20 pm to lsuguy84
It’s hilarious that you can’t even follow the thread I am in your dome so much that you gotta make stuff up to try to get a W.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:21 pm to ThePTExperience1969
You must have missed the earlier post.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:22 pm to dukke v
Houston was better than the spurs last year before what happened to harden happened. Now they have Chris Paul and are much better. Spurs are shite compared to this years rockets.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:22 pm to Boomshockalocka
Haven’t made anything up, Bubba. I’ve supported everything with links. Sounds like I’m in your head. I presented exactly what I meant to and you still couldn’t follow along.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:23 pm to lsuguy84
You made up that I was talking about career PER when I clearly never did just so you could say that harden wasn’t top 10ish.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:24 pm to Boomshockalocka
Rockets lost. They weren’t better. Spurs beat them. End of story.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:24 pm to Boomshockalocka
You’re melting. You have been consistent proven wrong by myself and other posters...take the L and move along son
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:27 pm to lsuguy84
I haven’t been proven wrong even once. Or even close to it. I can take on a whole thread of low IQ posters and come out on top. I do it literally all the time.
I can take on a whole thread of low IQ posters and come out on top. I do it literally all the time. 
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:28 pm to ReauxlTide222
Know what I hate about using WS/48 in isolation?
Because comparing players on a high % win team vs a low % win team plays a factor, pretty much saying the supporting cast has an effect as well.
For example,
Swaggy P is the same player he was last year. Except, he's on a winning team playing less minutes. His WS/48 is higher than last year and at a career high.
Patrick Beverley was pretty much the same player as he was last year. Except now he's on a losing team (before injury). His WS/48 is lower and is actually a career low.
Chris Paul is the same player as last year. Except he's on a better team and now his WS/48 is higher and at a career high.
Joel Embiid had a WS/48 of 0.117 last year, which wasn't top 20 but he was EASILY a top 20 player considering WS/48 neutralizes the fact he missed games and only takes into account the minutes he's on the court to extrapolate. If he played those same minutes on the '16 Celtics, his WS/48 likely goes into 0.200+ range
Because comparing players on a high % win team vs a low % win team plays a factor, pretty much saying the supporting cast has an effect as well.
For example,
Swaggy P is the same player he was last year. Except, he's on a winning team playing less minutes. His WS/48 is higher than last year and at a career high.
Patrick Beverley was pretty much the same player as he was last year. Except now he's on a losing team (before injury). His WS/48 is lower and is actually a career low.
Chris Paul is the same player as last year. Except he's on a better team and now his WS/48 is higher and at a career high.
Joel Embiid had a WS/48 of 0.117 last year, which wasn't top 20 but he was EASILY a top 20 player considering WS/48 neutralizes the fact he missed games and only takes into account the minutes he's on the court to extrapolate. If he played those same minutes on the '16 Celtics, his WS/48 likely goes into 0.200+ range
This post was edited on 12/15/17 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:28 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
I haven’t been proven wrong even once. Or even close to it. I can take on a whole thread of low IQ posters and come out on top. I do it literally all the time.
I OWN you every thread I decide to enter with you in it............
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:28 pm to Boomshockalocka
This is an epic melt from you. Keep on painting yourself into a corner.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:29 pm to dukke v
So does TBirdSpur. It’s hilarious.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:32 pm to lsuguy84
this is one of easiest wins I’ve had in a while Tbt. You gotta get some better guys on your side. Emphasis on guys. Plural. More than one. Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:33 pm to Boomshockalocka
You are correct. You have won making yourself look like an idiot once again. Congratulations on the moral victory.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:34 pm to Boomshockalocka
Dude just give us a player, a season, something that justifies your claim about Harden’s season being top 10ish ALL-TIME
Page 8 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News