- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:42 pm to jp90
Falcons getting destroyed by NE in the Superdome would be palatable for me...I think.
Living in SF with Niners winning a superbowl is a potential horror for me.
Living in SF with Niners winning a superbowl is a potential horror for me.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:44 pm to deeprig9
You have no reason to justify why some dislikes something. I hate Atlanta more because of you. Thanks.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:45 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
Living in SF with Niners winning a superbowl is a potential horror for me.
What about SF getting destroyed in the Superbowl?
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:55 pm to DaGarun
quote:
I still think its better to talk about "now" or "ever".
I agree, but now, does not mean just this season when you are talking about the overall strength of a franchise. The Redskins last won the SB 21 years ago. Since then their best season is 10-6, the Saints have had 4 seasons better in that time frame, including 3 of the last 4, plus 2 10-6 seasons. In those 21 years, the Saints had the better record 12 times, the Redskins 7, twice they had the same record. So I don't think it is arbitrary to say the Saints have been better in the recent past.
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:01 pm to H-Town Tiger
It's not arbitrary, I guess, just pretty meaningless. Saints might win it all next year. So might the Skins. Hell, so might the Cow.. never mind.
Anyway, my point is: things move fast now, and what a team did 3 years ago isn't as relevant as it used to be.
Anyway, my point is: things move fast now, and what a team did 3 years ago isn't as relevant as it used to be.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:07 pm to td01241
quote:
The Falcons winning a Super Bowl on their home field? or something else?
We still own the Falcons. Them winning the Super Bowl anywhere is good for them, insignificant to us.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:11 pm to Froman
The idea of Saints fans having to choose between seeing the Falcons win a Super Bowl in New Orleans, or Brady cementing himself as a better quarterback than Drew Brees can ever aspire to be, by winning a 4th Super Bowl, does make me smile inside.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:15 pm to DaGarun
DaG you might want some Bar B Que to add to your corn, that was a good cheap shot
The Saints worst nightmare is they find out another pay for play happened after this one. The NFL owners went after them hard last time, who knows how bad it would be next?
The Saints worst nightmare is they find out another pay for play happened after this one. The NFL owners went after them hard last time, who knows how bad it would be next?
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:15 pm to DaGarun
I'll grant you in an era where the Cardnials have made the SB and the Clippers have one of the best teams, having a strong owner is not as important as it was in the 1980's, though I still think that is Dallas' biggest problem
Cementing? How is that even debatable now?
quote:
r Brady cementing himself as a better quarterback than Drew Brees
Cementing? How is that even debatable now?
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:21 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Cementing? How is that even debatable now?
It isn't, but Saintards gonna Saintard.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:24 pm to BoardReader
Dude you won't find many saints fans who will argue that drew is better than Brady. I mean drew is awesome but it can be argued Brady is the best ever. I think you are just reaching now.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:26 pm to F machine
quote:
Dude you won't find many saints fans who will argue that drew is better than Brady. I mean drew is awesome but it can be argued Brady is the best ever. I think you are just reaching now.
Brady probably is the best ever; if you don't think Saintards will try to say Brees is better, you must be new to MSB.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:27 pm to BoardReader
quote:
Brady probably is the best ever; if you don't think Saintards will try to say Brees is better, you must be new to MSB.
Nah, we're just not judging an entire fanbase on a couple of unhinged message board posters.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:30 pm to BoardReader
quote:
BoardReader
I personally think Brady is the best, but out of the big 4 you can make an argument for any of them being the best.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:31 pm to BoardReader
I probably read and post here more than you. Some of you just like to lump all saints fans into a category of being idiots.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:31 pm to BoardReader
quote:
Brady probably is the best ever; if you don't think Saintards will try to say Brees is better, you must be new to MSB.
This is dumb flagship. Brees is the shite. Best QB in Saints history, but Brady has proven himself over a longer period of time to be the in the conversation as the GOAT. Montana was my benchmark, but Brady has probably surpassed him when it is all said and done.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:31 pm to BoardReader
quote:
It isn't, but Saintards gonna Saintard.
Find me one person who will argue this. Ill wait. Brady is the GOAT, duh.
Popular
Back to top


0





