- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ref homerism for Duke is out of control
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:11 pm to Keys Open Doors
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:11 pm to Keys Open Doors
Oh but the first one on tacko... are we just gonna ignore that one too. They literally prevented tacko from being able to play in the first half you dumb frick
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:11 pm to jpainter6174
We were both wrong. That was a foul on Zion.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:12 pm to jpainter6174
quote:
UCF player just got raped under the goal and the announcer says omg ... play on when they called a clear foul against Zion, the bias and narrative is real...
Announcers should be embarrassed.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:12 pm to Keys Open Doors
I wasn’t wrong it was clearly a foul, the announcer said it shouldn’t have been, that it should have been a play on... when it was clearly a foul
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:18 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
We were both wrong. That was a foul on Zion.
Just stop.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:22 pm to Python
Horrid call on Zion's 3rd foul. He didn't even touch him but got called for it.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:24 pm to ELLSSUU
It hit or at the very least is indisputable
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:24 pm to jpainter6174
It didn’t hit. Don’t know if it’s indisputable
Just another example of the severe Duke bias
Just another example of the severe Duke bias
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:25 pm to Weagle25
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:25 pm to Weagle25
It looks like it hit then bounced into the back board
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:26 pm to jpainter6174
quote:
It looks like it hit then bounced into the back board
It didn’t
Rotation never changed the top angle shows you what happened. The side angle makes you doubt it. But using reasoning, it didn’t hit.
But they can’t use reasoning. They have to go with indisputable evidence which it wasn’t. So the right call.
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:26 pm to jpainter6174
U f just screwed themselves there not the refs
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:26 pm to jpainter6174
I didn’t think so no rotation change so I thought just backboard
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:28 pm to Buckeye06
If it touched it just barely touched, but I don't think it did.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:28 pm to PearlJam
That may have been favorable 

Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:31 pm to PearlJam
Ucf screwed this game away if they lose, with the missed 2 in 1 and not getting that rebound
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:31 pm to Buckeye06
Zion charged. Whistles swallowed. Horrible officiating.
Popular
Back to top
