Started By
Message

re: Question RE GT

Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:47 am to
Posted by TulaneFan
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2008
14037 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:47 am to
If Georgia tech doesn't give a frick then why should you? That's all I can really say.. speaking from personal experience as a life long Tulane fan. I've been pretty loyal to them considering how bad they are year after year, but my passion has simmered down a lot. To be quite honest, I'm usually more interested in following my pro teams (Saints and Pels) and watching better CFB teams. You as a sidewalk fan should hitch your wagon to a more serious program
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:55 am to
quote:

get GT has tough academic standards but I don’t buy it. Stanford, Notre Dame etc. also have tough standards


Exactly the problem. The kids talent pool that can get into these schools is very small, and these two are taking the best ones right now. It's not like y'all ate getting fuctional retards like Radio Foster into GaTech.

Johnson is doing no help with his outdayed system. But like I tell Auburn fans, all the elite coaches already have jobs. But GT can do better than Ted Roof and Paul Johnson.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29193 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Reggie Ball under a Pat Nix offense accelerated Gailey's downfall.


FIFY
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71694 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I'm not sure that the triple option isn't just an easy scapegoat.

Right not, GT's biggest issue is that they directly compete with Georgia, Clemson, Alabama, Auburn, UF and FSU among others for talent. That is as competitive a recruiting state as there is and GT lacks the same tradition, facilities and has the academic barrier.

Johnson's issues have coincided with those other schools firing up their recruiting. I'm not really convinced a spread with inferior talent goes much better than triple option with inferior talent.


You will never ever compete with those schools, and many others, in recruiting if you're using that offense. According to Rivals Johnson's signed one class ranked above 40, it was 39, and that class consisted of exactly 27 3 stars. Tech has signed one 4 star RB, WR, and OL in his entire tenure. Gailey signed 1 RB, 2 QBs, and 1 WR that was rated as a 4 star in his'07 class.
Posted by RiseUpATL
Member since Sep 2018
2214 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:59 am to
Couldn’t have said it any better. Sucks but it’s the harsh reality. The days of Calvin Johnson, Derrick Morgan, Michael Johnson etc are over. We used have great players to watch. Now we just have undersized uninspiring talent.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:04 pm to
If run correctly that offense you guys are bitching about can not be stopped. Problem is nobody runs it anymore in lower levels so you have QB's that are not mastering it and there are few coaches that can teach the OL play. Look at what Army just did to OU. It does hurt that the conference teams see it yearly and can figure out what the splits mean.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 12:05 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

If run correctly that offense you guys are bitching about can not be stopped.
Triple option?
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:14 pm to
Yes the Triple Option, if run correctly is unstoppable due to the 2-1 it puts you into. People seem to act like that OU was forced out of the Wishbone due to Miami, but OU was running a hybrid of it with Aikman in 85. When he broke his leg they went back into the true Wishbone and ripped off 9 straight wins and a NC.

Johnson's Flexbone isn't really run correctly because they do not add the Run n Shoot elements in it to make it run correctly. Tracey Hamm, Deandre Smith, etc are guys who ran that offense to perfection.

You can try to Bear the Defensive front, but if they start hitting the hots it forces you out of it and they widen the splits the dive is back.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 12:17 pm
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71694 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Look at what Army just did to OU.

Keeping a game close doesn't mean it will translate to long term success for a P5 team. The offense puts a ceiling on what Tech can recruit and accomplish.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

So basically GT is fricked in terms of ever being an annually ranked team? I see a hole that GT can’t climb out of and perhaps I need to find a big boy program to follow if I want that experience.

The way I see it, GT has given up on the fans so why shouldn’t I give up on them until the commitment is made. Just seems like GT grads are okay with the results as long as GT is “going it the right way” by graduating players and having a system that gives the middle finger to conventional offenses. As a simple sidewalk fan who couldn’t care less about their academics that’s tough for me to accept as a reason to continue in mediocrity. Even Duke is recruiting better and has consistently gotten a little better.

Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:19 pm to
No it doesn't. Just because you think throwing the ball makes you open recruiting it does not. Problem is nobody runs it anymore at lower levels, so you are not getting the QB play and reps to run it correctly. Everyone is teaching the easy offense and you can be stupid to play QB in a "spread"
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Chan's problem was he hitched his wagon to a functional retard at QB who regressed every season. Those GT teams had really good defenses, solid running games, and the best WR in the country.

And Roman Reigns.
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19680 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:20 pm to
GT just needs a great coach. All things can be fixed/overcome with a truly exceptional coach (see: Stanford and Harbaugh/David Shaw).

CPJ has done some positives for the program but at this point his time is clearly up for all the reasons listed ITT.

Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:21 pm to
If I was Johnson and wanted to keep the option I would scrap the Flexbone and go into a Wing T or I Bone. The motion from that would screw with safeties all day. I mean the Spread is just basically a Single Wing with quick screens.
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10420 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

So basically GT is fricked in terms of ever being an annually ranked team? I see a hole that GT can’t climb out of and perhaps I need to find a big boy program to follow if I want that experience. 


I think they need something to get into the competition for decent talent. The last time GT really recruited well, Bama and Clemson hadn't really hit their recruiting stride and FSU was at the end of the Bowden run and in a down period.

A reason I think it's bigger than triple option is that triple option shouldn't hurt defensive recruiting, but it doesn't seem like defensive recruiting is going much better.

I'll say I don't know enough about GT's institutional situation to comment too much on what should change. I do think that is the major issue to address. Playing 2 and 3 stars just isn't a very sustainable solution. Kids won't be more attracted to just a more modern system because of all the other programs right around ATL that run more modern systems.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71694 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

No it doesn't. Just because you think throwing the ball makes you open recruiting it does not.

Me and the high level recruits who don't consider Tech
quote:

Problem is nobody runs it anymore at lower levels, so you are not getting the QB play and reps to run it correctly.

If you can't find anyone to run your offense, that's a recruiting issue.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 12:26 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:30 pm to
Why don't more teams use it?
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:31 pm to
Just to ask...

If Johnson rips off 8 straight wins and beats UGA what will you say about the offense then?

Do I think they will? Of course not, but it is not the offense that is holding back Tech, it is the academics and being in Atlanta that is making them be what they are and always been, a midline program with a year every decade of great play. They are the Minnesota of the ACC.

Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139850 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:34 pm to
Because it is hard to teach correctly, with the G, Load, Freeze, Counters, etc and when you can have a guy who can count to three it makes teaching the Spread easier. The Spread is easy to teach.

Why do you think the Spread is so fashionable? Because it is hard to teach or run? I mean a trained monkey could make good decisions as a QB in a Spread.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44915 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

but it is not the offense that is holding back Tech


It's the lack of recruiting because of the offense. No high school QB, OL, or RB with real NFL aspirations wants to play in that system. I remember a quote by Jon Dwyer after the Steelers drafted him where he basically said he had to learn to play RB all over again.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram