- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pretty amazing Brady/Patriots stat
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Rushing yards per attempt:
NE - 4.4
Den - 4.1
Defense points allowed per game:
NE - 21.2
Den - 24.9
Ouch.
Now this man knows how to show some facts.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to shaqfu33
quote:
The only time the 2 teams played head-to-head the Patriots won, so forgive me for not thinking that the Broncos are clearly the better team.
The Patriots only won because Brady >>>>> Manning and it's not even close.
/sarcasm
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:06 am to Colonel Flagg
I know this is a favorite MSB topic, but I saw this gif and could not keep it to myself.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 12:07 am
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:09 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
because Brady's success is actually a camcorder's success.
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:38 am to wildtigercat93
No more camcorder, no more Super Bowls. I'm sure it's a coincidence.
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:48 am to ballscaster
Yeah, they just lucked into all those division and AFC titles too :/
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:50 am to wildtigercat93
Never said they weren't good. Never even said they weren't great. But they've never proven on the field that they can win it all without a little extra help.
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:54 am to wildtigercat93
Yeah youre probably right. They wouldve deffinitly won in 08 if they had videoed a practice and saw how much stickem was on Tyrees helmet or how much holding the refs would allow on that play
And they deffinitly wouldve won in 11 if theyre camcorder wouldve told them that Julian Edleman probably wouldnt have been able to defend the giants recievers and to make the defense less terrible that year. Yeah thats logical
And they deffinitly wouldve won in 11 if theyre camcorder wouldve told them that Julian Edleman probably wouldnt have been able to defend the giants recievers and to make the defense less terrible that year. Yeah thats logical
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:00 am to wildtigercat93
The stick em on tyrees helmet is sarcasm right?
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:02 am to wildtigercat93
None of your rhetoric amounts to anything. We know the Patriots were cheaters, and we know that they haven't won anything since they've stopped cheating.
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:03 am to ballscaster
Oh well, stay ignorant, makes no difference to me
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:10 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
Your schtick is tired
Posted on 1/15/14 at 7:28 am to ballscaster
When you first started posting, at least you had interesting points of view. It's sad that you've just turned into a troll.
Oh, and you better hate you some Jimmy Johnson's Cowboys teams, because he did the same thing.
Oh, and you better hate you some Jimmy Johnson's Cowboys teams, because he did the same thing.
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:08 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
Yeah youre probably right. They wouldve deffinitly won in 08 if they had videoed a practice and saw how much stickem was on Tyrees helmet or how much holding the refs would allow on that play And they deffinitly wouldve won in 11 if theyre camcorder wouldve told them that Julian Edleman probably wouldnt have been able to defend the giants recievers and to make the defense less terrible that year. Yeah thats logical
Logical or not you can not ignore the fact that "spygate" was a real thing and they have not been as dominant since. Still very good but not dominant like they were.
And maybe he is right. Maybe if they had the cameras out they would have had a bigger lead, the games might not have even been within one possesion for them to come back. This arguement is just as valid as yours. They cheated and it was a real thing. It does not mean Brady is not a good QB, but facts are facts. They did what they did and if anyone wants to question them or doubt the previous accomplishments, that is no ones fault but the Patriots for doing it in the first place. I know I have my doubts and am not naive enough to say "aw hell it didn't make a difference". That is bullshite, if it didn't matter then why do it in the first place.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:10 am
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:13 am to gamecocks22
I'd go to the Super Bowl every year if the quarterback of the other team threw 50 percent of his the INT total he threw all year against me. And then my RBs ran for 409 yards and 5 touchdowns.
Or my kicker missed a 25 yard FG at the end of the AFC Championship Game.
Or my kicker missed a 25 yard FG at the end of the AFC Championship Game.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:16 am
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:22 am to lsutigers1992
The Brady Super Bowl Years:
2001--Brady injured, Bledsoe wins AFCCG
2003--Peyton Manning throws 4 INTs in AFCCG
2004--Roethlisberger 3 INTs
2007--Tomlinson injured
2011--Cundiff misses chip shot to take game to OT after Lee Evans drops game winning TD
2001--Brady injured, Bledsoe wins AFCCG
2003--Peyton Manning throws 4 INTs in AFCCG
2004--Roethlisberger 3 INTs
2007--Tomlinson injured
2011--Cundiff misses chip shot to take game to OT after Lee Evans drops game winning TD
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:24 am
Popular
Back to top


0



