- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Penn St 24 USC 38, FINAL, Rose Bowl
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:50 pm to Stamps
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:50 pm to Stamps
quote:
I disagree. I think UF is more athletic and physically gifted.
agreed
it's close as hell, but Tebow is the difference maker for me
Tebow as a college QB= 1000x better than Sanchez as a college QB
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:51 pm to givemeabeer
quote:
If the AP votes these arsebags No. 1, I think I may quit watching football.
I'll quit watching FB from early February till 8/30. I bet you do the same.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:51 pm to givemeabeer
quote:
USC has the most athletic, physically gifted team in the country for nearly the past decade. When they are motivated to play in a big game, 99% of teams do not stand a chance -- it is not just a Big 10 thing: they are just the unlucky bastards that have to get embarrassed every year.
ETA - I bet if we played every big game in Baton Rouge or New Orleans every single year, if we went to the Sugar every year, and Baton Rouge was a top 2 media market, we'd be getting the exact same hype. It's such a f*cking joke.
This post was edited on 1/1/09 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:51 pm to LfcSU3520
USC is the best team in CFB and the Big10 is a joke.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:52 pm to givemeabeer
quote:
And it doesn't hurt that every big game they play is less than 20 miles from their campus. Rose Bowl every year because they play in a shiit conference.
Same thing for LSU in BCS games.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:52 pm to Stamps
quote:
I disagree. I think UF is more athletic and physically gifted.
Wrong.
UF has better SKILL position players THIS YEAR. Guys like Demps, Harvin, Rainey > USC skill players.
USC has a MUCH better defense, ESPECIALLY the defensive line. USC also has a better OL and I would give them the edge at LB as well even though UF has Spikes and Doe (two ALL-SEC caliber guys).
I give UF the advantage at CB by a hair, but safety goes to USC (Mays > Wright at this point in their career. Ahmad Black for UF is a 3rd stringer that was forced into starting).
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:52 pm to lynxcat
If USC is soooo damn good why are they not in the National Championship game?
Because they really are not all that. They play in a weak conference and still cannot beat everyone in it, and then match up with weak opponenets in bowl games. FUSC.
Because they really are not all that. They play in a weak conference and still cannot beat everyone in it, and then match up with weak opponenets in bowl games. FUSC.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:53 pm to givemeabeer
USC is good, no doubt. NC good, no. They play weak teams and look excellent but if they played UF they would be crushed, OU would be a close game.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:53 pm to lynxcat
quote:
UF has better SKILL position players THIS YEAR. Guys like Demps, Harvin, Rainey > USC skill players.
You can't even really say this.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:54 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
If USC is soooo damn good why are they not in the National Championship game?
Because there's no playoff.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:54 pm to LuckyLee
quote:
LuckyLee
Go frick Yourself.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:54 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
If USC is soooo damn good why are they not in the National Championship game?
they played a weaker schedule, which does not necessarily equate to being a worse team
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:56 pm to TulaneTigerFan
damn PSU's commercial sucks 
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:56 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
they played a weaker schedule
Exactly and still managed to lose, so maybe they aren't as good as crooked nose claims.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:57 pm to TulaneTigerFan
they played a weak schedule and were not noticeably impressive during that schedule
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:57 pm to TulaneTigerFan
I the system we have now, getting to the NC game does not matter who is on fire late (see LSU last year). It is an evaluation of an entire year. You can argue Texas had a better year than OU, but they did not win their conference. You can argue at the end of the year last year, there were teams playing better than LSU, but LSU had the better all around year. That's what counts until we get a playoff.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:57 pm to TulaneTigerFan
I'll never feel sorry for USC as long as their conference and their in-laws in the Big 10 sandbag even the idea of a plus 1.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:57 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
Exactly and still managed to lose, so maybe they aren't as good as crooked nose claims.
their lose is pretty much equivalent to florida's, maybe not as bad since they were on the road
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:58 pm to TulaneTigerFan
I get tired of everyone comparing losses. You have to look at wins also.
Posted on 1/1/09 at 5:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
were not noticeably impressive during that schedule
that is what really killed their chances
Popular
Back to top


1




