- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pedro or Maddux?
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:42 pm to tigerclaws15
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:42 pm to tigerclaws15
pedro's time of dominance wasnt as long as maddux and that is not what I am arguing. His peak was possibly the best in baseball history
1
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:42 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
so now wins are the way you judge a pitcher!!!
Its called being THAT GOOD for alot of years. MADDOX>>> PEDRO!! You are a young frick who won't see this. BTW YOU DON'T WANT NONE OF ME TONIGHT!!!
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:43 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
pedro's dominance was at its peak with the Sox
He was pretty fricking dominant with the Expos.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:43 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
you realize Pedro has played 11 of his 18 seasons with NL teams, right?
Some JUST don't get it LES!!!!
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:44 pm to dukke v
quote:
Its called being THAT GOOD for alot of years. MADDOX>>> PEDRO!! You are a young frick who won't see this. BTW YOU DON'T WANT NONE OF ME TONIGHT!!!
wins are not a way to judge a pitcher. Since you dont know jack shite, you dont understand that. Like I said earlier, maddux was dominant longer but peak performance was pedro.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:45 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
He was pretty fricking dominant with the Expos.
no arguing that but his peak was with the sox
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:45 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
maddux was dominant longer but peak performance was pedro.
agreed.
So based on this i'll take Maddux.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:45 pm to dukke v
quote:
Some JUST don't get it LES!!!!
his name is PJ
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:46 pm to Lester Earl
Career, Maddux
In their prime, Pedro. And I say that as a huge Red Sox and Pedro hater.
Pedro from 97-03 was frickin sick.
'97 - 1.9 ERA and 305 Ks
'99 - 2.07 ERA and 313 Ks (13.2 K/9
) in the AL
'00 - 1.74 ERA and a 284/32 K/BB ratio in the AL
Maddux was great, but I don't think any recent pitcher can compare to how dominant Pedro was in 1999 and 2000. If he got to face a pitcher 3 times a game, his numbers would have been even more insane
In their prime, Pedro. And I say that as a huge Red Sox and Pedro hater.
Pedro from 97-03 was frickin sick.
'97 - 1.9 ERA and 305 Ks
'99 - 2.07 ERA and 313 Ks (13.2 K/9
) in the AL '00 - 1.74 ERA and a 284/32 K/BB ratio in the AL
Maddux was great, but I don't think any recent pitcher can compare to how dominant Pedro was in 1999 and 2000. If he got to face a pitcher 3 times a game, his numbers would have been even more insane
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:47 pm to dukke v
Mad dog. For sure
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:47 pm to tigerclaws15
I will never in my life forget Pedro as the starting pitcher in the all star game. He just mowed down the NL's best like they were in little league. It was truely a thing of beauty!
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:47 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
His peak was possibly the best in baseball history
Ever heard of Sandy Koufax??? I thought not!!!
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:48 pm to dukke v
quote:
Ever heard of Sandy Koufax??? I thought not!!!
I was wondering how long it would take you to bring up an old guy.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:49 pm to tigerclaws15
quote:
Since you dont know jack shite
EXPLAIN THIS!!!! SERIOUS!!!!
quote:
Like I said earlier, maddux was dominant longer but peak performance was pedro.
WOW!! With THIS SAID I will still take Maddox!!!
You don't know much about baseball.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:50 pm to dukke v
quote:
Ever heard of Sandy Koufax??? I thought not!!!
Is that the same guy the called the bambino? No thats not it. Was he a left hander for the giants that broke the home run record? Maybe. Of course I have heard of him you dumb frick. Pedro did this in the PEAK of the steroid era. That counts alot in my book. I didnt say the best, I said possibly one of the best.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:50 pm to dukke v
there are some major retards in this thread. The NL was a better league in the early to mid 90's when Maddux was dominant.
Maddux put together one of the most impressive careers ever. He's also arguably the best fielding pitcher of all time.
People act like Pedro spent his whole career with the Sox, when in fact he spent the majority of his career in the NL
Maddux put together one of the most impressive careers ever. He's also arguably the best fielding pitcher of all time.
People act like Pedro spent his whole career with the Sox, when in fact he spent the majority of his career in the NL
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:51 pm to dukke v
PJ tell these youngsters about JACK MORRIS and willie HERNandez!@#!@#
thanks
thanks
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:51 pm to dukke v
quote:
WOW!! With THIS SAID I will still take Maddox!!!
You don't know much about baseball.
I forgot more about baseball than you know.
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:52 pm to tigerclaws15
The original question asked about in their primes? Not career. So in that aspect I would take Pedro. If we said career then the answer would change
Posted on 4/27/10 at 8:54 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
PJ tell these youngsters about JACK MORRIS
GAME SEVEN. Jack MORRIS!!!
quote:
and willie HERNandez!@#!@#
1984 SCREWBALL CITY!!! WHAT a WEAPON. The LEAGUE HAD NO chance.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News