- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pac12 v Big Ten interleague agreement
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:32 pm to togar tiger
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:32 pm to togar tiger
FWIW, this is what an SEC/Big 10 agreement would have looked like. This was proposed by a Cleveland writer back in '07. I thought it was an amazing idea
Original Article
Follow-up
Original Article
Follow-up
0
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:43 pm to togar tiger
good idea, there is also a lot of smoke that michigan and notre dame are going to take a break from the series so this news corresponds with that.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:46 pm to rocket31
That makes scheduling easy for USC.
Nine conference opponents,
Notre Dame, Big 10 team "X" and
one mystery opponent.
Nine conference opponents,
Notre Dame, Big 10 team "X" and
one mystery opponent.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:47 pm to togar tiger
Id like to see 2 games a year be between BCS schools from another conference. If we're going to pretend the regular season is a playoff and vote on who the best teams are, we need more common opponents.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:49 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
That makes scheduling easy for USC.
Nine conference opponents,
Notre Dame, Big 10 team "X" and
one mystery opponent.
If Big 10 team X is consistently Ohio State, Wisky, Michigan or Nebraska...then "mystery" opponent better consistently be San Jose State.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:49 pm to bradwieser
This could make the regular season pretty awesome. It strengthens the Rose Bowl and BCS though.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:52 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
BCS haters should not like this, it solidifies the B1G/Pac12/Rose Bowl circle jerk.
Or it's a sign that Delany and Scott foresee the Rose Bowl being integrated into a playoff system or plus 1 at some level and want to maintain a yearly presence
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:53 pm to rocket31
quote:
there is also a lot of smoke that michigan and notre dame are going to take a break from the series
Any particular reason why?
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:54 pm to usc6158
quote:
Or it's a sign that Delany and Scott foresee the Rose Bowl being integrated into a playoff system or plus 1 at some level and want to maintain a yearly presence
I hope you are right.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:55 pm to usc6158
quote:
Any particular reason why?
Yeah I thought a few years ago they had signed some big arse 20 year agreement to keep playing each other or something?
I remember cause when reported the guy on ESPN said the stars of the last game in that agreement hadn't even been born yet.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:55 pm to usc6158
quote:
Or it's a sign that Delany and Scott foresee the Rose Bowl being integrated into a playoff system or plus 1 at some level and want to maintain a yearly presence
Scott yes. I just don't see Delany letting it happen under his watch. He strikes me as the kind of guy that if all 12 B1G schools tell him they are willing to give up the Rose Bowl for some kind of playoff he will just retire and let the next B1G commish handle that.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:56 pm to BamaDude06
when was the last time there was rematch in the Rose Bowl?
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:57 pm to togar tiger
quote:
Didn't realize it included Basketball too.
So is the B1G-ACC Challenge gone then? (didn't read the article)
Posted on 12/28/11 at 1:57 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Wow...which school gets lucky with Indiana and vice-versa Colorado?
They should make Colorado-Nebraska yearly
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:04 pm to BamaDude06
quote:
Scott yes. I just don't see Delany letting it happen under his watch
Delany comes off as a douche and one of the most outspoken opponents of anything related to a playoff in any format
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:05 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
when was the last time there was rematch in the Rose Bowl?
In 2002, Wash State and tOSU would have had a rematch, but tOSU made it to the BCS CG Fiesta Bowl instead.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:05 pm to jcole4lsu
I hate Jim Delaney.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:26 pm to bradwieser
I like the idea and would maybe love it if:
a.) it was rotating home and home
b.) as long as the opponents rotate.
For example,
I'd like to see the SEC and ACC do this:
2012: LSU @ Miami, FL
2013: Miami, FL @ LSU
2014: Clemson @ LSU
2015: LSU @ Clemson
2016: NC State @ LSU
2017: LSU @ NC State
a.) it was rotating home and home
b.) as long as the opponents rotate.
For example,
I'd like to see the SEC and ACC do this:
2012: LSU @ Miami, FL
2013: Miami, FL @ LSU
2014: Clemson @ LSU
2015: LSU @ Clemson
2016: NC State @ LSU
2017: LSU @ NC State
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:27 pm to jcole4lsu
the way i see it, it should be a two year thing so everyone gets a home game in the agreement
year one michigan state might host washington, then year two would travel to utah
random matchups like that
year one michigan state might host washington, then year two would travel to utah
random matchups like that
Posted on 12/28/11 at 2:27 pm to wheelz007
quote:
For example,
I'd like to see the SEC and ACC do this
do you realize that would chew up 28 years?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News