Started By
Message

re: Osweiler agreed to deal with Texans 4 yrs 72 million

Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by JG77056
Vegas baby, Vegas
Member since Sep 2010
12077 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:51 pm to
All I know is signing Osweiller means O'Brien won't draft Hackenberg and if we have to overpay to ensure that, I'm fine with it.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179035 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

All I know is signing Osweiller means O'Brien won't draft Hackenberg


Hackenberg would be a 3 yr project regardless, this doesn't preclude that at all, on you go....
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Well now what does Denver do?


fitzgerald. free agent

kaepernick. deal for picks.

Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Well now what does Denver do?


Jeffrey George is available.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

What's debatable?
The part that was bolded AND underlined?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Guess he would rather money than championships.
At his age and how much he's earned so far, this seems like an easy decision to take HOU's deal.

quote:

No way Denver makes it through the playoffs if Osweiler was QB.
No way NE wins when some random 6th round pick named Brady comes in after Bledsoe gets hurt!!!
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

No way Denver makes it through the playoffs if Osweiler was QB.

That Pittsburgh running back definitely wouldn't have fumbled if Osweiler was Denver's QB.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16209 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

They can scoop up ole what his face from Miss St. Dakarie



This is actually not far from the truth, as the Broncos have shown by far the most interest in Dak, and that was while they had 2 QBs.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
139475 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:46 pm to
Bring Tebow back is the only answer.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111519 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

That Pittsburgh running back definitely wouldn't have fumbled if Osweiler was Denver's QB.
Did I say he would have lost the Pitt game? No. But Peyton was 21-37 222 yards and no turnovers. He didnt play spectacular but he made zero mistakes

Lets look at the NE game

2tds and 0 int.

I stand by what I said. I dont think a first time starter gets through those two teams with a win.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:54 pm to
that's a damn good move for them. and they picked up Miller, the RB from Miami. they have filled the biggest needs (other than OL). they need to mortgage the house for one top OL and draft a couple of others for the longer term.

with their D they may have actually, for the first time, used some common sense to elevate their team. their owner, who I think is crazy as a Bessie bug, must be finally coming around.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram