Started By
Message

re: Ok, the play of the game was the charge that was reversed

Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:17 pm to
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34897 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:17 pm to
So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?

That makes no sense.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:18 pm to
Boom.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Looked like a clear block to me in real time

Replay confirmed, IMO
Agree.

quote:

I don't mind the reversal.
I think it is bullshite they can reverse that call in that one weird scenario. Also, it wasn't even close enough to the restricted area for review.

Bad rule, imo.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

From folks who are neither warriors, Cavs, or James fans and swore they didn't care about Cavs/Dubs Part IV


I said I wasn't going to watch because I was butt hurt over Houston losing

but I love Lebron

I can assure you, I am only interested because Lebron is incredible

My 15 year old after that dunk under a minute, jumped up and said "Dad, how does that man have that much energy left playing practically the entire game?"
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:20 pm to
I agree with your son.

Side note, I look forward to watching Finals games with my boy as he grows up
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58058 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

he wasn't set, right call was made, sucks they had the authority to overturn it...that's it


You dont have to be set, you only have to establish position.

His left foot was already down.

The ref who had the best view that called it had it as a change. The ref in teh replay booth had it as a charge. Steve Javie overruled both.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:21 pm to
I hope he grows up to be a Mavs fan.















Please don't let this ruin our friendship
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:22 pm to
Ohhhh that was low, sir. That was low!
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38120 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

It's only reviewable if they HAVE to go see if the defender's feet are on the line.


Yeah that doesn’t make it any better. I don’t know how that makes sense. If you review a foot on the 3 point line, can you look to see if he was fouled too?
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?



My thing is experts are weighing in and can't come to a consensus on the call. I don't know how they could've been confident enough to overturn that call. A call shouldn't be overturned unless there's no doubt about it being the wrong one.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84784 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?

That makes no sense.


I feel like I'm making it clear they should be able to overturn that BS all game.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110818 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?

That makes no sense.
Actually, it couldn't really make more sense to be honest.


The fact that there's 1 opportunity to check a call for accuracy but not be able to check others is just lunacy.

We know when refs are reviewing an out of bounds call, they can't change it and call a foul no matter how obvious a foul may be, even if it went out of bounds on the player that was fouled. But when they are reviewing in the restricted area or not they can magically change a judgment call on block or foul? That actually makes no sense, logically speaking.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

If you review a foot on the 3 point line, can you look to see if he was fouled too?
I'm not sure.

But rules are rules.

I just have no clue why any ref needed to see if Lebron's foot was on the line, thus allowing them to change the call.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:32 pm to
Yeah, I don't get how that ever became a rule.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

I just have no clue why any ref needed to see if Lebron's foot was on the line,
It would be like reviewing a Steph Curry 30 footer to see if he was behind the arc.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

The fact that there's 1 opportunity to check a call for accuracy but not be able to check others is just lunacy.
It's also crazy that the charge review basically has to be unlocked by another set of parameters.

The ONLY way they can review the charge/block is if the refs need to see if the player is in the restricted area.

He CLEARLY wasn't, but whatever...?
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

Half day it’s clearly a block
Half say it’s clearly a charge


so you go with the first call right?

which was a charge!!!

but no, they have pull out slow replay....consider it's GS and reverse it

covefe
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110818 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I don't get how that ever became a rule.

Yea, I thought it was a block, so I'm good that they got the right call.


But the rule to be able to do that makes no sense at all.


Not to mention, why were they even reviewing? It wasn't even close even in real time for needing to be reviewed for restricted area or not.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

It would be like reviewing a Steph Curry 30 footer to see if he was behind the arc.
Exactly.

It wasn't 4 feet like Lue said....but it WASN'T close.

So talk it out and make the call. Because ain't no way in hell they needed video to know he was well out of the restricted area.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:37 pm to
I'm sorry and I take it back
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram