- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:18 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Agree.
Looked like a clear block to me in real time
Replay confirmed, IMO
quote:I think it is bullshite they can reverse that call in that one weird scenario. Also, it wasn't even close enough to the restricted area for review.
I don't mind the reversal.
Bad rule, imo.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:18 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
From folks who are neither warriors, Cavs, or James fans and swore they didn't care about Cavs/Dubs Part IV
I said I wasn't going to watch because I was butt hurt over Houston losing
but I love Lebron
I can assure you, I am only interested because Lebron is incredible
My 15 year old after that dunk under a minute, jumped up and said "Dad, how does that man have that much energy left playing practically the entire game?"
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:20 pm to ApexTiger
I agree with your son.
Side note, I look forward to watching Finals games with my boy as he grows up
Side note, I look forward to watching Finals games with my boy as he grows up
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:20 pm to Ford Frenzy
quote:
he wasn't set, right call was made, sucks they had the authority to overturn it...that's it
You dont have to be set, you only have to establish position.
His left foot was already down.
The ref who had the best view that called it had it as a change. The ref in teh replay booth had it as a charge. Steve Javie overruled both.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:21 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I hope he grows up to be a Mavs fan.
Please don't let this ruin our friendship
Please don't let this ruin our friendship
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:22 pm to ReauxlTide222
Ohhhh that was low, sir. That was low!
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:24 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
It's only reviewable if they HAVE to go see if the defender's feet are on the line.
Yeah that doesn’t make it any better. I don’t know how that makes sense. If you review a foot on the 3 point line, can you look to see if he was fouled too?
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:25 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?
My thing is experts are weighing in and can't come to a consensus on the call. I don't know how they could've been confident enough to overturn that call. A call shouldn't be overturned unless there's no doubt about it being the wrong one.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:27 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?
That makes no sense.
I feel like I'm making it clear they should be able to overturn that BS all game.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:31 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Actually, it couldn't really make more sense to be honest.
So the one opportunity a game they get to double check a call for accuracy, they take it, and you guys are upset with that?
That makes no sense.
The fact that there's 1 opportunity to check a call for accuracy but not be able to check others is just lunacy.
We know when refs are reviewing an out of bounds call, they can't change it and call a foul no matter how obvious a foul may be, even if it went out of bounds on the player that was fouled. But when they are reviewing in the restricted area or not they can magically change a judgment call on block or foul? That actually makes no sense, logically speaking.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:32 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:I'm not sure.
If you review a foot on the 3 point line, can you look to see if he was fouled too?
But rules are rules.
I just have no clue why any ref needed to see if Lebron's foot was on the line, thus allowing them to change the call.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:32 pm to shel311
Yeah, I don't get how that ever became a rule.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:33 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:It would be like reviewing a Steph Curry 30 footer to see if he was behind the arc.
I just have no clue why any ref needed to see if Lebron's foot was on the line,
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:34 pm to shel311
quote:It's also crazy that the charge review basically has to be unlocked by another set of parameters.
The fact that there's 1 opportunity to check a call for accuracy but not be able to check others is just lunacy.
The ONLY way they can review the charge/block is if the refs need to see if the player is in the restricted area.
He CLEARLY wasn't, but whatever...?
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:35 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Half day it’s clearly a block
Half say it’s clearly a charge
so you go with the first call right?
which was a charge!!!
but no, they have pull out slow replay....consider it's GS and reverse it
covefe
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:35 pm to PearlJam
quote:Yea, I thought it was a block, so I'm good that they got the right call.
Yeah, I don't get how that ever became a rule.
But the rule to be able to do that makes no sense at all.
Not to mention, why were they even reviewing? It wasn't even close even in real time for needing to be reviewed for restricted area or not.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:36 pm to PearlJam
quote:Exactly.
It would be like reviewing a Steph Curry 30 footer to see if he was behind the arc.
It wasn't 4 feet like Lue said....but it WASN'T close.
So talk it out and make the call. Because ain't no way in hell they needed video to know he was well out of the restricted area.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 11:37 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I'm sorry and I take it back
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News