- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Now that USCw has lost, media will just find a new overrated anti-SEC darling
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:53 am to vuvuzela
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:53 am to vuvuzela
I'm fine. I didn't realize I was coming across as mad.
It's just text. I'm typing at a computer. And these whiners can't stop whining.
I should stop trying to prove them wrong and disappear. It worked for the first 2 waves of LSU fans. This 3rd wave I guess got to me.
It's just text. I'm typing at a computer. And these whiners can't stop whining.
I should stop trying to prove them wrong and disappear. It worked for the first 2 waves of LSU fans. This 3rd wave I guess got to me.
2
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:53 am to vuvuzela
Dudes piss is really hot this morning.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:54 am to genro
quote:
I should stop trying to prove them wrong and disappear. It worked for the first 2 waves of LSU fans. This 3rd wave I guess got to me
You disappeard earlier because I proved you wrong and shut you the frick up.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:54 am to genro
quote:
genro
you come across as mad.... very mad.. you should step away from the computer before you break something or get banned
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:54 am to ViaCavour
quote:You haven't responded. Please explain how Alabama fits the mold of an overrated, anti-SEC darling.
Just trying to point out the hypocrisy in this man's ways.
That's what this thread is about. This is the fourth time I've brought it up to you directly and you haven't responded and you keep talking about hypocrisy.
Please explain.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:54 am to genro
quote:
I'm fine. I didn't realize I was coming across as mad.
hmmmm, what would make us think that?
oh wait...
quote:
And it's the same stupid butthurt shite.
frick your goddamn fans. Seriously, the absolute fricking worst in sports. Who the hell whines about losing an NC because the team they played was too good?
And don't tell me it's anything else. That's fricking bullshite.
You weren't whining about Nebraska in '01
You weren't whining about OU in '03
You weren't whining about 1-loss UF getting in over undefeated Utah in '09
You are only whining because you had to play the one team that was possibly better than you, then they proved that they were.
You wanted an NC despite not being the best team
It is the most pathetic shite I have ever fricking seen
And that is an absolute fact and nothing you pathetic pissant sorry excuses for football fans can ever say will convince me otherwise
You are actually that terrible of fans. Just awful and sad and pathetic. Worst fricking fanbase ever.
maybe that
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:54 am to ViaCavour
quote:
You disappeard earlier because I proved you wrong and shut you the frick up.
:rotflmao:Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:56 am to genro
Now you are trying to best me with semantics after I got you to prove my point earlier? You weren't so keen on sticking to the topic for the first 8 pages.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:57 am to ViaCavour
You have no idea what you're even talking about, do you?
This is text on the internet. The title is clearly stated. It's not a turn of phrase or a euphemism. No one could think it is.
This isn't about semantics.
This is about you and your ilk hijacking a totally unrelated thread because you are pussy football fans who like to whine about Bama getting into the BCSNC and beating your arse.
This is text on the internet. The title is clearly stated. It's not a turn of phrase or a euphemism. No one could think it is.
This isn't about semantics.
This is about you and your ilk hijacking a totally unrelated thread because you are pussy football fans who like to whine about Bama getting into the BCSNC and beating your arse.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:58 am to genro
quote:
Winning 09 title game = past history, perception of team that is irrelevant to 2011
"One of greatest defenses of all time" = a subjective measure
"Heisman-caliber runningback" = has nothing to do with on-field performance and is once again a media/voter construct
"Inarguably the best coach in CFB" - this is really hilarious, so because the team is Nick Saban coached they deserve to be in over another team?
"had only lost 9-6 in OT to the undisputed #1 team in a game that seemed totally inconclusive to the objective eye whether you will admit it or not" - I think the scoreboard was pretty fricking conclusive that one team lost...but this is the only point in your whole post that doesnt have a subjective media bias angle to it and actually had to do with last year's on-field performance
Genro, you basically admitted yourself that Bama's past history and media/voters subjective views played a part in them choosing Bama over Okie State
those were your words
why are you so angry about it? its something to be proud of IMO
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 10:00 am
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:58 am to genro
genro, just shutup man... whether you're right or wrong, you're making yourself look incredibly stupid
Posted on 9/16/12 at 9:58 am to genro
Congrats on the ban
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:01 am to genro
quote:
Please tell me that msu or auburn would have made it in the championship game last year if they were in your spot. Again, I expect this to go unaddressed.
quote:
If MSU or Auburn were exactly the same as Bama
- had won 09 title
- one of the greatest defenses of all time
- Heisman-caliber runningback
- inarguably the best coach in CFB
- had only lost 9-6 in OT to the undisputed #1 team in a game that seemed totally inconclusive to the objective eye whether you will admit it or not
- etc etc
then yes, they would've been in over Okie State who lost to ISU
quote:
Simple yes or no, would last year's MSU team have gotten a rematch in the national championship game over Oklahoma state? Given all their same players, etc.
quote:
frick I'm tired of this. You asked a question and said all things being equal, but when I answered, you said ok, not all things being equal. Make up your mind. I don't fricking know. I know that any team with losses that gets in should be thankful. Then you have to take care of business. That includes our '11 team, and your '03 and '07 teams
quote:
No I didn't. Never once did i say all things being equal, I said "in your spot." You simply tried to create this hypothetical that you could dodge a no answer. I don't know if you noticed, but we just simply proved the point that media perception went a long way in your case. If MSU had your history it goes from I don't know to yes? If MSU had the perceived best coach in the land, which should have nothing to do with your bowl placement (again media bias), rather it should be simply your resume from that season, then they go from I don't know to yes?
quote:
I'm done. You are such a whiny little bitch.
21-0
GFY
Bama was better
The better team won
The media was right
Did I say 21-0
Our coach is better
Our program is better
You will never hold a candle
Deal with it
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 10:03 am
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:03 am to Eighteen
quote:I didn't BASICALLY admit it.
Genro, you basically even admitted yourself that Bama's past history and media/voters subjective views played a part in them choosing Bama over Okie State
I said it out-right. It's not in the post you quoted, though. I don't want to go find it.
Some voters probably voted for Bama because of their "status."
Some voted Bama because of conference ties (like, say, Les Miles)
And some voted Bama because they objectively thought Bama was better and more deserving.
For people to paint the entire thing with broad strokes and say "Bama only got in because they're media darlings" is completely asinine. Voters vote for different reasons. You have absolutely nothing to support that.
However, the reasons don't matter. Bama was voted in, the same way every non-undefeated BCSNC team has been voted in. None of the others were ever bitched about by LSU fans like this. Isn't that interesting?
Then, Bama proved the voters right
None of the know you reasons Bama was voted in. You're lying or simply bigoted if you say you do.
But we all know that Bama deserved to be there.
Hence, 21-0
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 10:05 am
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:04 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
to me, the biggest problem i would have had with the whole BCSNCG is if LSU would have lost in the SEC title game, and bama got in instead... to me, that would have been a real injustice
I thought I remembered reading somewhere that as long as we didn't get blown out of the GA dome, we would only fall to second and still get in.
quote:
i still think it should be 2 out of 3 though
Well, hopefully the playoff system will solve that.
To me, the outcome is what it is. To be a champion, you not only have to be great, but you have to win when it counts, in the clutch. IMHO, we could have beaten Bama 13 times straight and none of it would have mattered if Bama beat us the 14th time.
Bama did that, and not only did they win, they absolutely erased us in all phases of the game. They deserve the crystal ball.
I have a lot of Bama friends (including my boss). I don't give then shite for the way they got in because I don't believe it's relevant. Champions win championship games.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:07 am to genro
quote:
Some voters probably voted for Bama because of their "status."
wait, so when the second post of this thread was
quote:
Um, you're an Alabama fan. Your complaining in any way about the concept of "media darlings" after last year is hysterical.
why did you get upset and spend 11 pages arguing against it when you just said yourself some voters voted Bama because of their "status"
it was the closest margin between 2 and 3 in the history of the BCS, so any vote that was based on past status = helped you out = being a media darling helped you = you can't complain about about media darlings
you are too much man I dont even know what you are arguing about anymore
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 10:09 am
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:08 am to Eighteen
quote:
you are too much man I dont even know what you are arguing about anymore
He doesn't even know anymore. Now he just wants to stay on topic after he admitted we were right.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:12 am to genro
quote:
Nevermind. Apparently this is another butthurt thread about Bama not belonging in the 2011 BCSNC.
Well maybe that's because the only reason Bama was in the game was because they were media darlings.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:13 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Well maybe that's because the only reason Bama was in the game was because they were media darlings.
your move Genro...
Posted on 9/16/12 at 10:17 am to Eighteen
quote:
your move Genro...
He's waiting 30 minutes for us to be gone, so that he can revive the thread and not address the arguments.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News