Started By
Message

re: Notre Dame and Louisville to be next members of Big 12?

Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:34 pm to
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36163 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:34 pm to
I have heard absolutely zero about this.

Not to mention, it seems like:

A) Texas would be pissed beyond belief and not agree (they run the conference).

B) ND would downgrade in basketball significantly.

C) If ND wanted to do this in the Big East, we could, so why would we choose the Big Twelve instead if we're not going to play for a conference championship? Money would be the same, unless the BE loses its bid, which is extremely, extremely unlikely.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59125 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

hard to consider it a traditional rivalry when both parties plan on taking a break from the series....maybe your definition of rivalry is different than mine?


No its not at all. Syracuse and Penn State were traditional Rivals, as were Pitt and PSU. Is Texas-Texas A&M not a traditional rival? There are lots of reasons for schools to take a break. Mostly its either hurt feelings or money, not because playing the game is no big deal. I'd guess Michigan playing 9 B1G games, plus maybe a CCG would rather have Directional Michigan or some other rent a win home game OOC.

quote:

and the history of the navy game is why we keep it and always will; great story behind it.


I'm sure it is, but when 1 team wins 40 in a row, its not a rivlary, its a homecoming game.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36163 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:39 pm to
quote:


What's ND's record over the last 40 years vs Navy? I'd want to keep them on the schedule too. I'm sure everyone in South Bend gets way more pysched up for Navy week than Michigan week


The Navy arguably saved Notre Dame during WWII (when ND provided a much needed training ground for Navy members and they utilized the campus). We play them every year in appreciation. A lot more goes into that game than fans outside the program realize and it is absolutely the second-most important game (not from a football standpoint, but from a historical standpoint) on ND's schedule every year.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59125 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:47 pm to
I'm not doubting the history or saying its a game that should be canceled, but as one sided as it is, its not a true rivalry. Players don't go to Notre Dame because, man we get to play Navy and back before my grandparents were born, Navy really help ND

Does everyone look forward to Navy week?

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36130 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Notre Dame will not compete for the Big 12 conference title in football. They will play around five Big 12 games every year, and still get to play their traditional rivalry games. In every other sport, they will compete for the Big 12 title.

Notre Dame would still get to keep their own TV deal for football games.

Thoughts on this?



I don't understand how this will work out for everyone concerned.

The biggest issue is the television money and the games between ND and the Big "12" teams would be the issue.

If ND/NBC are getting the rights to those games then they certainly profit but what is the incentive for the Big 12?

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36163 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

I'm not doubting the history or saying its a game that should be canceled, but as one sided as it is, its not a true rivalry. Players don't go to Notre Dame because, man we get to play Navy and back before my grandparents were born, Navy really help ND

Does everyone look forward to Navy week?


That has nothing to do with rocket's original post. He was responding to the person saying that the Big Ten is full of ND's "traditional rivals" (as in, ND would be screwed without them) and he responded saying ND only has two opponents it has to play each year, and neither are in the Big Ten. I'd also argue MSU and Purdue definitely are more likely to be kept every year than Michigan, should we be forced to crunch numbers.
This post was edited on 2/6/12 at 1:52 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59125 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 2:31 pm to
I think what people mean when they say with out the B1G ND would be screwed is because with out them, they'd be playing more Navy level teams. If they are playing Texas and OU, it will wash out of course.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10671 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 3:11 pm to
ND should join the big ten and the big ten keeps 8 conference games and ND gets to play Navy and USC and rotate in BC and Pitt and Army and play one rent a win each year. With a big ten schedule they'll have about 4 winnabel games each year and 4 tough ones.

If they join the big 12 expect a rotation system so they don't play Texas and OK every year and they keep Purdue, Navy, USC,and MSU on the schedule permanently and keep Michigan on a rotation. Four big 12 games rotated; USC, Purdue, MSU, Navy; as permanet rivals and four games with Michigan and BC rotated in with some patsies like Army and so on. At least four games will be patsies including two from teh big 12 and two out of four rotated teams.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22029 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

A) Texas would be pissed beyond belief and not agree (they run the conference).
If this happens, I guarantee that Texas blessed it. Texas is probably pushing for it.

quote:

B) ND would downgrade in basketball significantly.
Big 12 Basketball is not a significant downgrade...it's a downgrade, though.

Not sure if this will happen, but I can see it happening.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51665 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 5:58 pm to
very interesting. I have heard Clemson and FSU as potential candidates for the big 12. Lots of smoke about that on other websites. Either way it does appear like the big 12 is looking to expand.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99112 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Thoughts on this?


Rick Pitino tried everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, he could to keep Louisville from getting a Big 12 invite the last time this was floated. He desperately wants them to stay in a "basketball conference". Strong on the other hand is all for it. And their AD Jurich is caught somewhere in between.

I'm really interested in seeing on how it pans out. Things could get real ugly in that athletic department depending on how smooth it goes over.

And if it does happen, shame on the Big 12 for not having the balls to tell Notre Dame to shite or get off the pot.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

shame on the Big 12 for not having the balls to tell Notre Dame to shite or get off the pot.


ha, at this stage in the game the big12 needs ND more than ND needs the big12.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125420 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

I have heard Clemson and FSU as potential candidates for the big 12. Lots of smoke about that on other websites. Either way it does appear like the big 12 is looking to expand.



I have heard this too esp with fsu fans getting sick and tired of the lack luster of acc football and how the big game atmosphere has left and how none of the acc teams outside of clemson bring any fans
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22029 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:07 am to
The ACC is suffering right now, but I doubt FSU or Clemson would leave for the Big 12. I can see them joining the SEC if the SEC decides to expand to 16 and they REALLY want out of the ACC.

My only issue with this info is that the Big 12 would only have 11 teams competing for the conference title in football. I guess the Notre Dame games against the Big 12 teams would be considered non-conference...but it means that the other teams would play 9 conference games, with three non-conference games...so, no divisions and they wouldn't play one team every year. Maybe they can live with that.

This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 10:08 am
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36163 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:49 am to
quote:


If this happens, I guarantee that Texas blessed it. Texas is probably pushing for it.


Texas was willing to get rid of its biggest rival (and in fact did get rid of its second biggest rival) to be the clear leader of the conference. Texas will play second-fiddle to nobody, which they would certainly would be if ND came over in a deal like this.

quote:

Big 12 Basketball is not a significant downgrade...it's a downgrade, though.


I will concede, you're right about this. In fact, with Cuse and Pitt now leaving the Big East and going to the ACC and (if this deal would happen) Louisville to the Big Twelve, I'd actually say the Big Twelve might be the better basketball conference. However...

quote:

Not sure if this will happen, but I can see it happening.


Of course you can "see it happening". There's a lot of things that could happen. But I've heard absolutely nothing about this and none of our boards are mentioning it at all, so I highly, highly doubt it.

And as stated earlier, this just doesn't make a lot of sense from the Big Twelve's (i.e. Texas) standpoint. It makes a little from ND's, if they get the scheduling freedom stated, but the ACC still is the better fit, based on academic prestige, type of universities (only one private school in the Big Twelve, 5 in the ACC), geographical reach (ND is already a midwest school. Big Twelve wouldn't add much. But the ACC would add the East Coast, all the way from Florida up through New England), other sports (basketball, baseball, lacrosse), etc.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram