- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Note Dame 0-2 ranked #24
Posted on 9/16/25 at 10:24 am to iwyLSUiwy
Posted on 9/16/25 at 10:24 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
So there should just be 3-4 ranked teams every year in the top 25
What
I'll explain it for the retards:
Last year only 1 top 25 team had less than 2 losses.... Which means the other teams in the top 10 most likely lost to other top 10 teams. Notre Dame also lost to (2) top 10 teams this year. If they shouldn't be ranked then last years standings should have been
1. Oregon
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Is that good enough for how dumb that logic is?
5
Posted on 9/16/25 at 10:39 am to Dantheman504
quote:
Is that good enough for how dumb that logic is?
Are you comparing the rankings after 12-13 games to the rankings after 3?
The argument is that Notre Dame is 0-2 RIGHT NOW and ranked. As has already been pointed out a 0-2 team has not been ranked in the top 25 in 37 years.
Clemson is 1-2, with a loss to #3 and #18 by a combined 10 points and is unranked.
There are 8 teams in the AAC undefeated or with 1 loss who are not ranked.
There are 9 teams in the ACC undefeated or with 1 loss who are not ranked.
10 in the Big 12 unranked.
9 in the Big 10. 4 in the SEC. More in the MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt.
You're telling me none of those teams are more deserving of being in the top 25 in week 4 than winless Notre Dame.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 10:59 am to Wayne Campbell
quote:
The argument is that Notre Dame is 0-2 RIGHT NOW and ranked. As has already been pointed out a 0-2 team has not been ranked in the top 25 in 37 years.
Clemson is 1-2, with a loss to #3 and #18 by a combined 10 points and is unranked
That's not a comparison and I'd like to see a stat on how many of those teams were 0-2 vs (2) top 10 ranked teams. GT was unranked when Clemson lost, which is why they are unranked. Your argument is that Clemson lost by more than double the amount of points to a team that is half as good as 1 of the other teams?
You are really going to compare a loss to an unranked GT to a #16 SEC team?
Clemson was also digging out of holes in those games and not simply going h2h or back and forth with top teams.
If you actually thinks that's comparable then its not worth it to argue with something that ridiculous.
This post was edited on 9/16/25 at 11:13 am
Posted on 9/16/25 at 11:18 am to Dantheman504
quote:
Last year only 1 top 25 team had less than 2 losses.... Which means the other teams in the top 10 most likely lost to other top 10 teams. Notre Dame also lost to (2) top 10 teams this year. If they shouldn't be ranked then last years standings should have been
This is your brain on drugs. Just say no.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 11:35 am to Dantheman504
quote:
Last year only 1 top 25 team had less than 2 losses
Now do it after week three dumb arse. I'm talking about right now, not possible end of season rankings.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 11:41 am to Dantheman504
You're arguing that Notre Dame must be good because they've only lost to teams that beat Notre Dame.
Clemson led or was tied with LSU for 48 minutes. Yes, they trailed GT by 13 at one point.
It may end up that Clemson is bad and has a bad season. Georgia Tech may or may not be good. At this point in the season, no one really has multiple marquee wins.
Which is kind of the whole point. Notre Dame at 0-2 is only in the top 25 because their name is Notre Dame and they lost to teams named Texas A&M and Miami.
quote:
Clemson was also digging out of holes in those games and not simply going h2h or back and forth with top teams.
Clemson led or was tied with LSU for 48 minutes. Yes, they trailed GT by 13 at one point.
It may end up that Clemson is bad and has a bad season. Georgia Tech may or may not be good. At this point in the season, no one really has multiple marquee wins.
Which is kind of the whole point. Notre Dame at 0-2 is only in the top 25 because their name is Notre Dame and they lost to teams named Texas A&M and Miami.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 6:48 pm to Wayne Campbell
Will Notre Dame move into the top 15 with this huge win against the powerhouse known as Purdue?
Purdue 2-2
Notre Dame 1-2
Purdue 2-2
Notre Dame 1-2
Posted on 9/21/25 at 8:45 am to Dantheman504
quote:
Last year only 1 top 25 team had less than 2 losses.... Which means the other teams in the top 10 most likely lost to other top 10 teams. Notre Dame also lost to (2) top 10 teams this year.
This is not in anyway apples to apples. You’re comparing end of year results. Not a team who had literally 0 wins. If Notre Dame wins out they should and would be firmly back in. But that’s not the case right now
Posted on 9/21/25 at 9:06 am to vidtiger23
Nebraska has a lot of close losses to good teams. Should they be ranked?
Posted on 9/21/25 at 9:28 am to ShermanTxTiger
Anyone in this thread arguing that ND get the benefit of every doubt is full of shite.
Posted on 9/21/25 at 9:50 am to RohanGonzales
ND now be1-2 will move up to the top 20. fricking ridiculous.
Posted on 9/21/25 at 10:20 am to GentleJackJones
quote:
Nebraska has a lot of close losses to good teams. Should they be ranked?
You’re saying this year? They have 3 wins and 1 loss.
Posted on 9/21/25 at 10:23 am to Dantheman504
They’ll be top 3 in espn fpi and probably move into the top 5 in both polls
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News