Started By
Message

re: Multiple NBA Teams Phasing Out Term 'Owner'

Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155444 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:22 pm to
Reality: Players don’t care what the title of the person who possesses the franchise is as long as he/she pays them what they’re owed per their contract.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11969 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

ya dude.. they could now be uneducated, illiterate "sharecroppers"


You are showing your ignorance. Sharecroppers were not exclusively "Black".
Slave owners were not all "White". Google "Black Slave Owners".
In the 50's I remember a Black teacher who drove by home every day in his 1956 Chevrolet, to work. My family didn't own an automobile.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

You are showing your ignorance. Sharecroppers were not exclusively "Black".
Slave owners were not all "White". Google "Black Slave Owners".
In the 50's I remember a Black teacher who drove by home every day in his 1956 Chevrolet, to work. My family didn't own an automobile.


With respect...this is the problem with attempting to argue with these clowns. You end up getting into some historical debate which, at its heart, has NOTHING to do with whether or not any rational person would equate owning a sports franchise with owning people.

Bringing up slavery, sharecropping, Jim Crow, etc is just a pharmaceutical grade non sequitor on their part designed to get you and others to argue a non point.

Don't be baited into that.
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

 Sharecroppers were not exclusively "Black". 


my bad. 99% of them

just log off dude
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

When they did, they frequently became tenant farmers or sharecroppers. By 1900, 36 percent of all white farmers in Mississippi were either tenant farmers or sharecroppers (by comparison, 85 percent of all black farmers in 1900 did not own the land they farmed).


Proven wrong again

Just log off dude
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:26 pm to
tenant farmer's were differently classified. why are you including them in your numbers dude
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:34 pm to
No they weren’t and those aren’t my numbers

So log off dude
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:36 pm to
if you don't think there is a difference between tenant farming and sharecropping than that really do speak volumes
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:38 pm to
They both owed money both ran land both rarely overcame poverty

You need to know the difference which is none. But hey you’re an insider of the Lakers so you’re either a liar or a con

Next thing you’ll try to tell us migrant farmers are people who hold land rights

I bet you also think rednecks were held in higher regard than slaves

So log off dude
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 3:42 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66385 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 3:59 pm to
Jesus the own the team not the players

You don’t have to call him master, just boss.

Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Sharecroppers were not exclusively "Black". 


my bad. 99% of them


Link?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:09 pm to
his whole schtick is to never prove anything, just say shite like "if you think ______, then wow I can't help you." never any facts to disprove, just a "wow how could you possibly be that dumb" attitude and nothing more.

very much like boom, jr here
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

boom, jr here


That’s not a good thing actually
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:28 pm to
I didn't mean it as good.

It's just a schtick to play.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40436 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:35 pm to
Stephen A asked Silver about phasing out the term, calls Lacob by it multiple times just minutes later without a second thought.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 6:36 pm to
Because Stephen A is playing a part on tv
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61131 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Stephen A asked Silver about phasing out the term, calls Lacob by it multiple times just minutes later without a second thought.



Because 24/7 news channels must fill their newsfeed with something. Even if its total garbage.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94381 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Multiple NBA Teams Phasing Out Term 'Owner'




Surely we knew this was coming. In the age of "everything is racists!!!!", the concept of rich old White dudes "owning" a collective of physically primed black men was sure to rile up the Woke Scolds on Twitter...and LeBron.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:03 pm to
frick this gay earth
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 15Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram