re: Most over-rated

As for places to eat, how do you feel about Paspigal (sp?) in the Market area?

quote:

---

"After the game, Pasadena police Lt. Tom Peterson said 12 arrests were made – 10 for public intoxication, one for burglary and one for sexual battery."

---

I don't even want to go to the "crime blotter" card. It's weak smack, but honestly we're still hurting over USC point guard Ryan Francis being senselessly murdered in his hometown: Baton Rouge, LA

Ok..mine:

1. Charlie Weiss...you don't just lose at ND. Less success than Davie and Willingham = puke.

2. Bob Stoopes...has lost his last 4 BCS games and was embarrassed in two and made a fool in another (Boise). Singlehandedly responsible for Hawaii getting to play UGA last year after Boise "proved" they belonged.

3. Tommy Bowden...see my last post

4. Mack Brown...NO reason why Texas should not win it all every year. He cannot beat OU except once in a blue and always finds a way to play UT out of contention when they can smell BCS.

5. Jeff Tedford...The big deal? Cal had more skill talent than anyone but USC and they still faded out of the top 25. Why is he still at Cal if he's so hot?

quote:

---

Please scroll through these BCS rankings for the 2003 season and tell me when USC was ranked #1 by the BCS.

---

This is what USC fans are simply incapable of grasping. Each and every team assented to the BCS system well before the 2003 season began. They agreed that the BCS and the BCS alone would determine who played in the championship game. The human polls were merely ONE COMPONENT of the BCS. The fact that USC finished the season atop ONE COMPONENT of the BCS is entirely inapposite and immaterial. By definition, a single consitutuent component of a multi-faceted system is not and cannot be dispositive. According to the specious "logic" adopted by certain USC fans, it would be equally appropriate to award championships for each of the other consitituent components of the BCS. We would have a national champion for each computer poll and, in 2003, a national championship for strength of schedule.

The whole purpose of the BCS was to crown a single national champion by systematically balancing input from a variety of disparate sources. That aim would be entirely frustrated if, as certain USC fans insist, a proliferation of national championships were awarded for each constituent of the BCS.

How can anyone not have Mark Richt. Not that hes a bad coach, but he always tops lists of SEC coaches.

What has he proven? All you hear about is his fantastic recruiting classes, and how his players give 110%, but why has he not taken UGA to the next level?

Only 2 SEC championships, and the year everyone thought they were the best SEC team, LSU beat them twice.

Once again the hype machine is fever pitch, and after they lose 2+ games this season, maybe "experts" will come off of his jock a bit, but they'll probably blame the "impossible" schedule.

quote:

---

How can anyone not have Mark Richt. What has he proven? .....

Only 2 SEC championships

---

Other than Spurrier, no coach in the SEC has more championships!

Been in Athens 7 years finished in the Top 6 4 times, Top 10 5 times. That is equal to Saban & Miles combined.

quote:

---

This is what USC fans are simply incapable of grasping. Each and every team assented to the BCS system well before the 2003 season began. They agreed that the BCS and the BCS alone would determine who played in the championship game.

---

The system that allowed an Oklahoma team that was destroyed in it's conference championship game was obviously broken.

There's no doubt we were better than OU, and fortunately for LSU, you never had to play us.
Homefield advantage "SEC style" doesn't phase USC one bit.

lower alabama trojan...dude, really?

LSU doesn't claim that their OOC schedule is that big a deal, playing the middle to lower class of the PAC 1, so why do you guys make such huge claims about the mid to lower class of the SEC? and powerhouses like Virginia? woo hoo. West Monroe Rebels could beat Virginia.

I think Frank Beamer is very overrated....so sick of hearing about Beamer ball......VT had a couple of good years....but always seem to under achieve.

Pete Carroll

Yeah add my name to the list. He's a good coach but not great.