- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McNabb traded to Redskins
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:36 pm to OBUDan
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:36 pm to OBUDan
quote:
God, you are a such a frickwit.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:36 pm to adammwilson
quote:
as I said with a valid source he rated as the worst OT.
FO is a good source. Unfortunately, the article you cited provided nothing other than a single sentence. What was the formula? What was accounted for? Also, they had their stats wrong.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:37 pm to adammwilson
quote:
and fans (other than you)
Actually, I was the one who said he didn't perform to potential.
Then you backtracked on your original statement from "He was horrid" to "He was horrid given how much they paid yatta yatta yatta."
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:38 pm to adammwilson
quote:
adammwilson
my friend, give up. your arguments just got trashed man
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:41 pm to Ross
While I agree it is odd to trade to a division rival, I guess the Eagles thought the money they would save is worth it. Also, they must have faith in Kolb. I actually really like Kolb and think he suits the Eagles offense. I think he'll do well.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:41 pm to adammwilson
Why do you have to make every thread about you?
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:45 pm to OBUDan
BTW Adam, I found the Football Outsiders article that you referenced based off of a link you found from RotoWorld.
I like the intention of Football Outsiders, but in this case not only are their stats wrong, their formula is entirely too base. They make no consideration for pass attempts.
No shite San Francisco and Tennessee are going to yield less sacks. They throw it like 20 times a game. Eagles throw it 35+ just about every game.
Naturally, more pass drops ='s more opportunities for yielded hurries/sacks and the football outsiders article do nothing to figure that.
Here's there shitty argument, for those interested. Nice concept, bad execution IMO.
I like the intention of Football Outsiders, but in this case not only are their stats wrong, their formula is entirely too base. They make no consideration for pass attempts.
No shite San Francisco and Tennessee are going to yield less sacks. They throw it like 20 times a game. Eagles throw it 35+ just about every game.
Naturally, more pass drops ='s more opportunities for yielded hurries/sacks and the football outsiders article do nothing to figure that.
Here's there shitty argument, for those interested. Nice concept, bad execution IMO.
This post was edited on 4/4/10 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:47 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Unfortunately, the article you cited provided nothing other than a single sentence. What was the formula? What was accounted for? Also, they had their stats wrong.
i don't have a premium account with ESPN. The article is on ESPN but football outsiders did all the homework on it.
LINK
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:48 pm to adammwilson
I just outlined for you why their argument is horribly flawed.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:48 pm to hg
quote:
Why do you have to make every thread about you?
I don't everyone else does. I never have this problem on the sec rant!
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:50 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I just outlined for you why their argument is horribly flawed.
I see that.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:51 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Then you backtracked on your original statement from "He was horrid" to "He was horrid given how much they paid yatta yatta yatta."
It wasn't a back track. You guys on here just need everything to be explained to you. Obviously he wasn't horrid or they would have benched him. However, like I said he didn't live up to expectations and the majority of that o.line (Andrews brothers) sure as heck didn't.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:55 pm to adammwilson
quote:
It wasn't a back track.
quote:
He was horrid
quote:
Obviously he wasn't horrid
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:57 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
Robot Santa
This post was edited on 4/4/10 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:58 pm to adammwilson
could you stay on the SEC Rant maybe? you're sing;e handedly ruining the best board on TD.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:01 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
GynoSandberg
go back to the fantasy sports board.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:02 pm to GynoSandberg
we just need a football board for people like adam can talk with out retards who dont know anything about football
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:02 pm to adammwilson
quote:
You guys on here just need everything to be explained to you.
Dear god.
Adam you point blank said, "He was horrid this year."
In no way did you qualify it. It's a fricking message board. Everyone on the fricking planet earth is going to read that as "Adam Wilson says Jason Peters is awful."
Then, a few posts later you come back and say, "He was horrid for what they paid etc."
That's a qualifying statement. You didn't have one at the beginning. That's why you are being crucified.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:03 pm to Lester Earl
Anyways, back to the topic.
Eagles have 5 of the first 87 picks. That's pretty damn crazy.
11 picks overall.
Eagles have 5 of the first 87 picks. That's pretty damn crazy.
11 picks overall.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:05 pm to OBUDan
why do so many redskins fan think mcnabb is just a trade piece. wtf.. i thought they'd all be 100% excited..
Popular
Back to top



2




