- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana High School - Select vs. Non-Select?
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:01 am to alterego55
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:01 am to alterego55
quote:Thats why catholic votes no everytime and even had their AD hold a special session to try and combine 5a again while WM, Destrehan and other public’s vote yes for the split?
had to do split so catholic high could finally win a state championship in fb
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 11:34 am
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:15 am to alterego55
quote:
had to do split so catholic high could finally win a state championship in fb
Nailed it
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yes Catholic, karr, and Acadians have like a 80% winning record over the 5a public state champs the last 10 years
Yes but part of that is the self fulfilling prophecy created by the split. It has watered down the product. The best players are going to play for the best teams. By creating the split you created a perception that public schools could not compete with private schools at the 5A level. The five years before the split 5A brackets weren't dominated by a single program and the semifinals typically had 3 public schools and 1 private or select school.
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 11:34 am
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:35 am to armytiger96
It’s a self fulfilling prophecy created by the public’s . They wanted the split and they made themselves worse because of it
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:59 am to armytiger96
quote:even though that since integration the majority of the championships in the 2 biggest classes over the years were majority publics.
Yes but part of that is the self fulfilling prophecy created by the split. It has watered down the product. The best players are going to play for the best teams. By creating the split you created a perception that public schools could not compete with private schools at the 5A level. The five years before the split 5A brackets weren't dominated by a single program and the semifinals typically had 3 public schools and 1 private or select school.
once you get to quarterfinals the product is not watered down. and there were many early round blowouts before the split.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 11:59 am to lsupride87
quote:
It’s a self fulfilling prophecy created by the public’s . They wanted the split and they made themselves worse because of it
Yes that was my point!
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 12:21 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
even though that since integration the majority of the championships in the 2 biggest classes over the years were majority publics.
Yes I am in agreement with you. The split wasn't necessary because the public schools were dominant in the top classifications. I had a pretty close view to how dominant some of those schools were in the early 90's.
The split has watered down the product because now there are two brackets. In my opinion Central doesn't win state last year in pre-split bracket.
How much better would the playoffs be if we started the bracket with the 32 teams that played this weekend in a combined bracket.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 12:25 pm to armytiger96
quote:For the 4a and 5a schools cramming JC and ECA down the throats of 1A through 3A - yeah it kinda was. Remember in the early 2000s 4a and 5a were tired of JC and ECA and wanted them gone. Poor leadership at that time gave us the split.
The split wasn't necessary because the public schools were dominant in the top classifications. I had a pretty close view to how dominant some of those schools were in the early 90's.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 12:41 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
3a and below even b and c vote overwhelmingly for the split.
You didn’t mention the political games designed to make B and C (improperly by today’s rules), vote for the original football only split, a sport they didn’t have and something that wasn’t rectified until a few years later
quote:
By creating the split you created a perception that public schools could not compete with private schools at the 5A level.
My problem with that is that perception extends to all the nonselect schools whether they voted for the split or not…
The real issue is that school boards don’t want to make themselves open enrollment and even if they could, can’t do so across parishes, but that’s not something the LHSAA can regulate. LHSAA also can’t make rules that would limit private school athletic eligibility to only kids in that school’s parish. They cant decide what class a school plays sports in even if it’s obvious that one doesn’t belong where they’re placed
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 12:56 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





