Started By
Message

re: Let's talk about Tom Brady's last 8 playoff losses

Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:08 am to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

So the SB isn't part of the playoffs?
They are included in these playoff stats that i will post for a fourth time:

Tom Brady playoffs: 247ypg 1.65tds/g .85ints/g 62.11% completion and 87.5 rating

Peyton Manning: 286ypg 1.61 tds/g 1.03ints/g 64.3% completion and 89 rating
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:11 am to
There is



no need



for rustling.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

There is
Thanks for admitting defeat. You did so semi-honorably.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7097 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:13 am to
All the people in here saying it's an arbitrary time frame, or a deliberate selection to make Brady look bad are missing the point.

After 2004, the Patriots went from being about the team to being "Tom Brady's New England Patriots."

The 3 wins were very much team wins, with the defense contributing equally to the game as the offense.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

They are included in these playoff stats that i will post for a fourth time:

Tom Brady playoffs: 247ypg 1.65tds/g .85ints/g 62.11% completion and 87.5 rating

Peyton Manning: 286ypg 1.61 tds/g 1.03ints/g 64.3% completion and 89 rating
I guarantee that 99% of the people on both sides of this debate would tell you that their playoff stats were more disparate.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:14 am to
His 2 SB mvp awards disagree.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

All the people in here saying it's an arbitrary time frame,
The time frame isnt needed, even when you look at his complete history it isnt better. The team results were better certainly, but the qb play has been the same between brady and manning in their playoff careers
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:14 am to
Keep up the good troll.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I guarantee that 99% of the people on both sides of this debate would tell you that their playoff stats were more disparate.
People are lazy, and they lap up what the media tells them without actually finding out the truth on their own. The media promotes stories and characters, not facts and truth. Just look at the Incognito/martin story for further proof
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Keep up the good troll
Posting facts that directly respond to the point of a thread is trolling? Who knew.
Fact: Manning is better than Brady in the regular season
Fact: Brady has been better than Manning in Super Bowls
Fact: They are even in the Playoffs overall.

This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:17 am to
You guys are still going at it?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

All the people in here saying it's an arbitrary time frame, or a deliberate selection to make Brady look bad are missing the point.

After 2004, the Patriots went from being about the team to being "Tom Brady's New England Patriots."

The 3 wins were very much team wins, with the defense contributing equally to the game as the offense.
You'll get reasonable responses that oppose some things you've said here, but here's something you just can't argue with:

Through 2004, Brady generally came through in the clutch in the playoffs. He choked in the 2003 playoffs by going 0-0 in the postseason (the worst postseason record you can possibly have).

Since 2005, he has choked every single time he has been in the playoffs.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Since 2005, he has choked every single time he has been in the playoffs.
Dont stoop to their idiotic level. He hasnt choked either, his teams have just lost
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Keep up the good troll.

^^^Troll

You're calling him a troll, and all he did was post stats.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:19 am to
The point is PM is the superior quarterback over Brady by a larger margin than people think, and they're postseason numbers are identical

Brady plays like his usual self, PM melts the frick down
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107803 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Brady plays like his usual self, PM melts the frick down

Incorrect again. They both have about the same very slight drop in play in the playoffs:
Tom Brady playoffs: 247ypg 1.65tds/g .85ints/g 62.11% completion and 87.5 rating
Regular Season: 255ypg 1.88tds/g .69ints/g 63.4% completion and 96 rating

Peyton Manning playoffs: 286ypg 1.61 tds/g 1.03ints/g 64.3% completion and 89 rating
regular season 271ypg 2.04tds/g .91ints/g 65.5% completion and 97 rating

It is actually quite amazing how wrong most people are about sports due to media influence
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 10:27 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88543 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

The point is PM is the superior quarterback over Brady by a larger margin than people think, and they're postseason numbers are identical

Brady plays like his usual self, PM melts the frick down



It's really funny that you keep posting incorrect things and calling everyone else a retard.
Posted by hikingfan
Member since Jun 2013
1754 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:

theunknownknight

I am loving your posts in this thread. You are saying everything I wanted to say and doing a much better job at it. I didn't even have to post.

quote:

arbitrary qualifier.

2005 is not some arbitrary year. It was the season after their unprecedented 3rd Super Bowl win in 4 years and a year or so before they got busted for spy-gate.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7097 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Message Posted by Korin His 2 SB mvp awards disagree.


Yes and no. He played well in both of those games, no doubt. But after that, the structure of the team changed. The whole team became about Brady.

It's difficult to maintain a complete team when you pay one player 20 mil. Look at the number of Super Bowls won by teams with high paid QBs.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:37 am to
The variables are so off that's absurd

Rule changes, rosters, etc.

take it on a year to year and you'll see. TB in 2007 wasn't the same TB from 2003. You can't have years of elite
Performance tied to some playoff numbers when he wasn't the same QB.

TB was an 85 passer for a few years because he was playin with horseshite on O, was playing under different rules and the team was structured differently on O.

One thing does favor manning heavily, a lot of those poor performances and losses came to teams that won the Super Bowl that year

Pats x 2 IIRC, steelers 05, ravens, saints, Seahawks

Non SB winners- chargers x 2 07, 08, jets 2010
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 10:43 am
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram