Started By
Message

re: Lebron almost got 40 points and 20 assists tonight.

Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:17 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463741 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

I believe you can shoot as low as around 35% FG and still benefit from taking shots.

well FG% is only part of the story

what shots you're taking and the FTs you get (and your rate) matter a great deal
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:18 pm to
They are fricking horrendous. I root for the team dryer to catch on fire after every Heat game.
Posted by Pierce Hawthorne
Member since Feb 2013
29 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:19 pm to
quote:


Any reasoning that PER is a joke? Or any sort of link or statistic regarding Lebron's defense you care to share?


He gives up more points per 100 possessions then guys like Griffin, Carlos Boozer, and Lamar Odom.

On a side note, Paul George is quietly have a great year but since his PER isn't that high (because it doesn't have any defensive measurements/factors whatsoever), few notice it. If he keeps his high level of play up, he should be DPOY.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68744 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Pierce Hawthorne



Troll alter.
Posted by R_o_y
Member since Jul 2012
682 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

I don't think you understood any of what I wrote to be honest.



Well, I did take PHD level statistics course. You are right, I haven't bothered to break down his formula. I could probably if I wanted to, but I at least get the general premise, i.e. a sample is only as good as it is representative of a total population. The PER makes homogenous sample out disparate groups with inequal opportunity, i.e. players that are injured, sit out for various reasons, etc., are weighted the same as player that can play 40 minutes per game.

Actually, I don't get your complaint since Lebron is a high volume player and therefore his PER sample is great (less margin for error). If anything, it would be players that play less what would benefit from this stat, but I'm sure he has his formula weighted in some manner to benefit players that play more minutes.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 11:29 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
63809 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Lebron almost got 40 points and 20 assists tonight.


I could of sworn it was only 16...kind of a good bit away from 20... and by that logic we should say everyone who gets 6 assists "almost has 10 assists".

Also, to the guy who complained about the Heat not making shots to give LeBron more assists, they shot 55.4% with only 12 TO's, and the Kings had 19 TOs. Plenty of opportunities to score...and they even shot about 52% from 3-range while having 25+ 3-pt FG attempts.

Oh and on top of all that they went into overtime.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 11:30 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126562 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

now now play along with the narrative or else you will be scolded!!!!!!!!!







#heatnation
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Actually, I don't get your complaint since Lebron is a high volume player and therefore his PER sample is great (less margin for error). If anything, it would be players that play less what would benefit from this stat.


You misunderstood my point. That's what happened. My complaint isn't PER's evaluation of LeBron. It's PER in general. PER doesn't give a negative treatment for missed FGs, and all you have to do is shoot over 33% to have a positive impact. So it has a tendency to overvalue volume scorers over other types of players. I'm not saying it's a bad stat or anything. It's very useful. I just prefer others, and wish other catch all stats got more press.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8652 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:42 pm to
People complaining that players can chuck up shots at a 33% clip and still improve their PER may be right, idk, but here's the top 15 guys

Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, Tony Parker, Brook Lopez, Tim Duncan, Dwyane Wade, James Harden, Blake Griffin, Carmelo Anthony, Russell Westbrook, Kobe Bryant, Kyrie Irving, Andre Drummond, and Andray Blatche.

You have to go all the way to Drummond before you find a guy not a consensus all-star and both drummond and blatche put up great stats they just don't play alot. There isn't a single "chucker" on that list, and I think the top 4 guys are probably the order most NBA experts and hardcore fans would put them

ETA: In fact, look at a guy like Rudy Gay who's the definition of an inefficient volume shooter/scorer. He rates as a below average player according to PER. JR smith is almost right at league average, and Jamal Crawford is just slightly above
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 11:47 pm
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68744 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

they shot 55.4% with only 12 TO's, and the Kings had 19 TOs. Plenty of opportunities to score...and they even shot about 52% from 3-range while having 25+ 3-pt FG attempts.


Bron is shooting almost 58% for the season. The rest of those fricks need to pick it up. Thanks for proving my point.












Posted by R_o_y
Member since Jul 2012
682 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

You misunderstood my point. That's what happened. My complaint isn't PER's evaluation of LeBron. It's PER in general. PER doesn't give a negative treatment for missed FGs, and all you have to do is shoot over 33% to have a positive impact. So it has a tendency to overvalue volume scorers over other types of players. I'm not saying it's a bad stat or anything. It's very useful. I just prefer others, and wish other catch all stats got more press.


Volume shooters take more difficult shots. Centers usually have over 50 percent FG percentage. They also usually take fewer and easier shots. It doesn't necessarily stand to reason because a guy has 33 FG percentage and is a volume shooter that his efficiency is less. In any case, Lebron is shooting 57 percent from the field.
Posted by Pierce Hawthorne
Member since Feb 2013
29 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:53 pm to
He's also taking half his shots within 8-10 of the basket too. He still can't really post up either, but hey when you get all the calls you need and you're the best athlete in the game, who needs to develop a full basketball game?
Posted by DesignatedT
San Antonio
Member since Aug 2011
1043 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:55 pm to
In 5 quarters but still impressive. Guy has been on a tear.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126562 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 12:11 am to
gamecockalum in da buidling
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68744 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 12:16 am to
quote:

gamecockalum in da buidling



He's back.... again.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91265 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 12:50 am to
quote:

I could of sworn it was only 16...kind of a good bit away from 20... and by that logic we should say everyone who gets 8 assists "almost has 10 assists".


FIFY.

Remember that class in middle school about ratios?

16/20=X/10...
Posted by R_o_y
Member since Jul 2012
682 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 1:14 am to
quote:


FIFY.

Remember that class in middle school about ratios?

16/20=X/10...


80 percent of 20 assists is almost. So yea, 8 assists is almost 10 = 80 percent. Basically, if that's not the case, 3.2 assists is not close to 4. Just sayin...
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 1:19 am
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
87310 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:53 am to
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 10:11 am to
I've got to hand it to GCA. He doesn't waste time trying to hide his alters. He goes straight for the Movie board and Lebron threads.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 2/27/13 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Fat Bastard

I didn't know we started measuring guys by their career-high point totals from one game.

This would mean that Wilt, Kobe, Elgin Baylor, David Thompson and David Robinson were better than Jordan.
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 10:22 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram