Started By
Message

re: JW's Accuser family presser today. Family: *Its gonna be good*

Posted on 12/10/13 at 5:54 pm to
Posted by Hazelnut
Member since May 2011
16466 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

There's no reason to smear this kid if it's been decided by the law that he did nothing wrong. They need to move on.

Posted by SaintCajun
Pacific Northwest
Member since Apr 2012
4294 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Uhh, there's a rather obvious reason


Which is?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Which is?
Well, I thought it was obvious

None of us here no with 100% certainty that she was not raped. I don't think she was, but like I said, I don't THINK, i don't actually know, just like no one posting here knows.

So...the obvious reason would be if she got raped.
Posted by SaintCajun
Pacific Northwest
Member since Apr 2012
4294 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:20 pm to
I thought you were going to say something else that's why I asked
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
10168 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

So...the obvious reason would be if she got raped.


When was the last time that an actual rape victim held a press conference?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

I thought you were going to say something else that's why I asked
Gotcha
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

When was the last time that an actual rape victim held a press conference?


I don't know, I don't keep track, but luckily for me, that's irrelevant.
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
10168 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

I don't know, I don't keep track, but luckily for me, that's irrelevant.


No it's not. It's a sign that they are out for attention/fame by slandering a famous person.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
36805 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

There's no reason to smear this kid if it's been decided by the law that he did nothing wrong. They need to move on.


Here's your sign.......
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

No it's not. It's a sign that they are out for attention/fame by slandering a famous person.
Or not.

She could be gearing up for a civil suit.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Here's your sign.......

Well, I already proved that statement you quoted wrong.
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25249 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:29 pm to
Good for her, if she was really raped she deserves to throw it all out there as a frick you to that tPOS.
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
10168 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

She could be gearing up for a civil suit.


=

quote:

out for attention/fame by slandering a famous person.



Exactly
Posted by SaintCajun
Pacific Northwest
Member since Apr 2012
4294 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

She could be gearing up for a civil suit.


Not sure how she would feel having her entire sex life put on display for people to judge. Not to mention that her identity would become "known"
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9057 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:32 pm to

Maybe she believes she didn't consent to whatever happened and therefore was raped and is angry about it?

If that's the case, it's not difficult to understand why she may may want to make it as uncomfortable as possible for Winston.

For all the stones being thrown, no one really knows that isn't the case.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 6:37 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

=

quote:
out for attention/fame by slandering a famous person.


Exactly
Not necessarily, not at all.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Not sure how she would feel having her entire sex life put on display for people to judge. Not to mention that her identity would become "known"

Me neither.

I'm just giving possible reasons based on the post stating there was no reason to smear his name.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 6:35 pm
Posted by SaintCajun
Pacific Northwest
Member since Apr 2012
4294 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:34 pm to
A DA with almost 30 years of experience and his team of investigators spent roughly a month looking into this case. If they say there is nothing that supports a rape conviction, then I believe he didn't rape her.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68809 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

There's no reason to smear this kid if it's been decided by the law that he did nothing wrong.


No, the State assessed they couldn't get a conviction. Has nothing to do with whether what he did was right or wrong.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112644 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

A DA with almost 30 years of experience and his team of investigators spent roughly a month looking into this case. If they say there is nothing that supports a rape conviction, then I believe he didn't rape her.

I believe he didn't rape her either.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram