Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

It was literally the definition of a moving screen

Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:31 am
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
6696 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:31 am
LINK

There’s no way you can watch that and say it’s not a moving screen. UConn had their chances, but they can’t complain about that call. Only argument they have is that you don’t call it at that moment in the game. Which I get. But there’s no way that’s not a moving screen
This post was edited on 4/6/24 at 8:39 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115709 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:34 am to
It clearly was.

People online are influenced because ESPN didn’t who the angles that clearly show it, and they had 3 former UConn players on their broadcast
Posted by Kenny Stapler
Member since Dec 2023
173 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:40 am to
The only thing that will be remembered is the champion this year. So it’s really not worth talking about anymore.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98952 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:41 am to
It was a moving screen. Sticking that hip out on a screen has been called in men’s and women’s for awhile.

That said, you rarely see that called that late in a game. But it is what it is.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34530 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:42 am to
It was a textbook moving screen. Her feet were too far apart to set a legal screen and there was definite contact with her elbow, though Marshall flipped a little. But it was the right call.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28585 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 8:44 am to
It was a moving screen and a great job by the defender to play through the screen and take the bump. To not call it would have been taking away a great play by the defender.
Posted by Simplemaaan
Member since Sep 2007
3808 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 9:18 am to
Looks like a left tackle sliding to make a block. Of course it was illegal.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34465 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 9:21 am to
I been seeing people complaining about this. But after watching that, how is this even a debate? That’s a totally illegal screen.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
1973 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 9:25 am to
interesting how they only call it once or twice a game but there are literally 20 moving screens a game. like carrying or traveling, very selective when they blow the whistle.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42509 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 9:51 am to
quote:

But after watching that, how is this even a debate?


So a lot of people have changed their opinion after watching the replay. In the game thread, the vast majority of the people thought it was a terrible call.

ESPN did not show a good angle of it on replay, and a lot of people in general feel like refs shouldn’t call fouls in general at the end of the game. I always find it funny when someone gets hacked on a drive and if there’s a foul called somehow it’s the ref deciding the game.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14496 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 10:58 am to
Okay. Time for some whataboutism.

What about the half dozen times where Clark blatantly pushed off to get separation on her jump shot? A couple were full arm extension and not one was called.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21120 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 12:24 pm to
That SHOULD be called. Same with player using their arm to clear out a defender on a drive to the basket. All that stuff should be called.

Defenders have to be able to move with the ball handler. They also need to be able to go straight up to contest a shot. You see the offensive player constantly hunting contact in mid air.

And yes, that was an illegal screen. I’m glad they called it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram