Started By
Message

re: If the Patriots win

Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:37 am to
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18418 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:37 am to
quote:

If the Patriots win
Nobody will be able to argue that Tom Brady isn’t the GOAT.

I'll still say they won 11 games with Matt Cassel in 2008 and that Brady is a system QB, therefore not any sort of GOAT.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:42 am to
quote:

No one can deny the performances Brady has had IN the Super Bowls he's played in. But the road to get there? It's been much easier than the rest of the NFL has dealt with on average.


You usually get easier roads to the Super Bowl by winning the most games in your conference, and getting the higher seed. That's the entire point of higher seeds.

Also the AFC has had a better record against the NFC than vice versa in most seasons of Brady's career.

Only reason he beat the Jags and Titans this year to get to the super bowl is because those two teams beat the #2 and #3 seeds.


But sure let's do the checklist

2001: Beat a 13-3 Steelers team at Heinz with a Bledsoe bc Brady got hurt. Beat NFC #1 seed in Super Bowl. So they knocked off the two top seeds in the playoff picture

2003: beat McNair led 12-4 Titans Beat 12-4 Manning Colts at Gillette (they were a 3 seed) in AFC title game. Beat 3 seed NFC champ in SB Carolina

2004: Beat 12-4 Manning Colts in divisional round, beat 15-1 Steelers in AFC title game, then beat 1 seed Philly in SB

2007: Beat Jags (who beat the Steelers in wildcard round) and chargers (who beat the Colts in the divisional round.

2011: Beat Ravens in AFC title game. Same team essentially that won the SB the following year

2014: Beat Ravens and Colts, both who upset higher seeds to get to that round. Then beat the #1 NFC seed in Super Bowl

2016: Beat the AFC #3 seed Steelers and the NFC #2 seed.

Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

I'll still say they won 11 games with Matt Cassel in 2008 and that Brady is a system QB, therefore not any sort of GOAT.


What system does he play in
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110782 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:49 am to
quote:

You usually get easier roads to the Super Bowl by winning the most games in your conference, and getting the higher seed. That's the entire point of higher seeds.

If you can't acknowledge that NYJ/MIA/BUF have been pretty much shite the past 15 years, it's kinda useless to discuss this with you, no?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110782 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:49 am to
quote:

What system does he play in

The one with the near perennial top 10 defense.
Posted by The Midnight Rider
Where the River Empties
Member since May 2015
1576 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:12 pm to
This still doesn't address what I'm referring to:

The fact that all 3 of the other teams in the AFC East have been incompetent to downright abysmal for the duration of Belichik/Brady being in NE.

Also, on average, the NFC has been FAR more competitive than the AFC for the last 17 years. Brady and Belichik have basically sleepwalked their way to a bye every year since going to NE.

How anyone can argue against this is beyond me.

Again, I think Brady is the GOAT for his performances in the SB, but their regular season have been far easier than, Drew Brees and Sean Payton's, for example.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

The one with the near perennial top 10 defense.


That's not a system or why he is a statistical successful QB.

Arguing he cant be the best ever because he's played on good teams is just as dumb as arguing he is the best ever because he's played on good teams.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The fact that all 3 of the other teams in the AFC East have been incompetent to downright abysmal for the duration of Belichik/Brady being in NE.


As are most divisions with a dominant team of the era. Strong teams create a power vacuum and teams struggle to find consistent playoff appearances which leads to more turnover and constant poor records. Same shite had happened in the SEC with Saban.

quote:

Also, on average, the NFC has been FAR more competitive than the AFC for the last 17 years. Brady and Belichik have basically sleepwalked their way to a bye every year since going to NE.


Factually that is incorrect. AFC has had a better record against the NFC in all but 4 of Brady's seasons as a pro.

quote:

How anyone can argue against this is beyond me.


Sorry you are letting your perception lead you eyes instead of what actually happened
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94980 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

As are most divisions with a dominant team of the era. Strong teams create a power vacuum and teams struggle to find consistent playoff appearances which leads to more turnover and constant poor records. Same shite had happened in the SEC with Saban.

Holy fricking shite
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:21 pm to
I know right?!!
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18418 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:21 pm to
quote:


What system does he play in

The Belichick system where the OL and Def are consistently good and he just plugs people in at QB, RB, WR.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94980 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

I know right?!!
You just compared a sport with recruiting, to a sport with a salary cap, all while mentioning the patriots power vortex causing the other AFC east teams to struggle


There is literally no reason for anyone to ever even try and discuss the patriots with you
This post was edited on 1/29/18 at 12:24 pm
Posted by The Midnight Rider
Where the River Empties
Member since May 2015
1576 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

As are most divisions with a dominant team of the era. Strong teams create a power vacuum and teams struggle to find consistent playoff appearances which leads to more turnover and constant poor records. Same shite had happened in the SEC with Saban.



Using a college conference analogy is a false equivalency. The fact is, the AFC East is pretty much the ONLY division that has been this top-heavy thru the years. AFC South when Peyton was dominating was close, I'll give you that, but no other division has had such disparity between 1 team and the other 3 as the AFC East.

quote:

Factually that is incorrect. AFC has had a better record against the NFC in all but 4 of Brady's seasons as a pro.



Why does record of NFC vs. AFC mean the AFC is better? That's like saying the AFC is better bc they won the Pro Bowl this year. Again, false equivalency. The NFC is WAY more competitive on average than the AFC. There's a new team emerging from it every season. shite, 13-3 doesn't even guarantee you a bye in the NFC. But it damn sure does in the AFC.

quote:

Sorry you are letting your perception lead you eyes instead of what actually happened



Again, I think Brady IS the GOAT. I am in awe of what he and Belichik have accomplished. But I also have eyes, and a brain, and logic, and I am very willing to point out the TRUTH that their division and conference lend them an easier road to every SB. I'm sorry that YOU can't be reasonable and objective.

It's perfectly ok to admit they had an easier road. Hell, you can even take the stance of "Welp, they played the cards they were dealt and got it done!" But to just blindly refuse to acknowledge it, and then outright deny it, makes you wrong. Suck it.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:29 pm to
It's the easiest point of reference to make in today's climate

Same shite with Peyton and the AFC south in his heyday if you want a more recent NFL example
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Using a college conference analogy is a false equivalency. The fact is, the AFC East is pretty much the ONLY division that has been this top-heavy thru the years. AFC South when Peyton was dominating was close, I'll give you that, but no other division has had such disparity between 1 team and the other 3 as the AFC East.


There's also never been a team to dominate for this long. Especially in the salary cap era

quote:

Why does record of NFC vs. AFC mean the AFC is better? That's like saying the AFC is better bc they won the Pro Bowl this year. Again, false equivalency. The NFC is WAY more competitive on average than the AFC. There's a new team emerging from it every season. shite, 13-3 doesn't even guarantee you a bye in the NFC. But it damn sure does in the AFC


You are saying the AFC has been a shittier conference for most of his career then how would the head to head record not matter? Isn't that how we determine which teams are better?

You are picking out certain years in which the NFC has had more competitive seeding and using it across the board. That's silly.

That's like me saying "oh 7-9 doesn't get you a home game in the AFC but it sure as hell does in the NFC"

Tell me what metric you have that the NFC has been better than the AFC over the past 17 years.

Posted by LuapGibb
Walker, LA
Member since Jul 2009
540 posts
Posted on 1/29/18 at 6:24 pm to
Bill Russell says hello.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110782 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 8:23 am to
quote:

That's not a system or why he is a statistical successful QB.

No but it is the reason why he has way more Super Bowl wins than other comparable QBs in his era.

quote:

Arguing he cant be the best ever because he's played on good teams is just as dumb
Where did I argue that?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram