Started By
Message

re: If Contraction Ever Occurs, What Teams Would or Should Be Axed?

Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:11 pm to
Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Your Mom’s Sperm Donor
Member since Jan 2013
13900 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:11 pm to
NFL would never make it here in SA
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36630 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

How can anyone say Nashville, Tampa, and Anaheim for the NHL?


Really the only NHL team that actually should (and not contract, but just move) is Phoenix.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:19 pm to
Pelicans
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38223 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

I bet the NFL adds 2 teams in the next decade: Los Angeles for sure, Toronto, Orlando, Las Vegas or San Antonio for the second


absolutely not
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13690 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

I think Las Vegas could support a MLB team.
no chance. its a transient town who wont follow a brand new team. you may get new yorkers in town to gamble to attend a road yankee game, but not enough to build a franchise around. too many games, not sexy enough, way too sslllllooowwwwwww.


lets face it, franchises who have been in 1 place for a very long time have a distinct advantage. people grew up fans, their kids are fans, and their kids will be fans. people grow up with an emotional bond to a team, and it ignites the passion to spend thousands of dollars on tickets and merch. its extremely hard to manufacture that passion without the history and emotional connection. i just dont see a baseball franchise surviving in vegas
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13690 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

I bet the NFL adds 2 teams in the next decade
they wont. they are at a perfect 32 teams. 34 would be very hard to balance schedules and divisions. while the NFL has the easiest brand to sell and could pull it off in multiple more markets, they arent going to expand to a 34 team league. more likely is some movement-- j-ville/buffalo/SD trying to maneuver to LA, maybe some wildcard destination that promises a new stadium.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38223 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:59 pm to
quote:


Nhl - columbus, florida, phoenix, nashville, anaheim, tampa


Tampa is a good franchise
Posted by bayoubengal03
Member since Nov 2006
937 posts
Posted on 6/14/13 at 5:36 am to
quote:

If you are getting rid of Carolina and Florida Tampa needs to go as well.


Why's that?
Posted by bayoubengal03
Member since Nov 2006
937 posts
Posted on 6/14/13 at 5:40 am to
quote:

I think Las Vegas could support a MLB team. Wasn't there a rumor before the recession happened that the Oakland A's were looking at moving there? I bet the NFL adds 2 teams in the next decade: Los Angeles for sure, Toronto, Orlando, Las Vegas or San Antonio for the second



Florida already has 3 teams no one watches
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 6/14/13 at 5:40 am to
The team comprised of my whore wife's labia. Certainly no expansion needed there.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram