- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:47 am to okietiger
He hasn't passed Joe Montana yet. That should be his next goal.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:05 am to okietiger
I think KC gets one more ring under Reid and Mahomes and that is it.
If Eagles can keep a core, they will be tough for the next 5 years. Washington on the rise too.
If Cinci would get their heads out of their asses and work out an average defense they would eclipse KC.
If Eagles can keep a core, they will be tough for the next 5 years. Washington on the rise too.
If Cinci would get their heads out of their asses and work out an average defense they would eclipse KC.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:16 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
Mahomes likely wins 1-2 more titles, at most. The core of their dynasty (Kelce, jones) are all old. Their OL is trash and will need to be completely rebuilt. And they have no weapons - WR, TE and RB all need playmakers
And Andy Reid will retire in a couple years
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:18 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
Mahomes likely wins 1-2 more titles, at most
2 more would be 5. That would put him second all-time
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:53 am to lsufball19
quote:He's old and extremely dumb.
2001 16/27 145 yds 1 TD 0 INT
2003 32/48 354 yds 3 TD 1 INT
2004 23/33 236 yds 2 TD 0 INT
2007 29/48 266 yds 1 TD 0 INT
2011 27/41 276 yds 2 TD 1 INT
2014 37/50 328 yds 4 TD 2 INT
2016 43/62 466 yds 2 TD 1 INT
2017 28/48 505 yds 3 TD 0 INT
2018 21/35 262 yds 0 TD 1 INT
2020 21/29 201 yds 3 TD 0 INT
What were all these "clunkers" he had in the super bowl
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:58 am to okietiger
After last night, he needs to 3 peat or win 8 - unless he goes on some crazy NFL MVP run.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:58 am to lsufball19
quote:
What were all these "clunkers" he had in the super bowl?
I mean
145 yards and your offense scores only 14 pts
Another Super Bowl where the offense scores only 13pts
Another Super Bowl where the offense scores only 14 pt
And rhen a fourth Super Bowl where the offense scores 17 pts
That’s 4 times the offense under Brady was shite in super bowls and he would have been blown out if his defense didn’t throw in an elite performance
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 8:59 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:05 am to lsupride87
quote:
That’s 4 times the offense under Brady was shite in super bowls and he would have been blown out if his defense didn’t throw in an elite performance
I'm afraid I'm going to need one of your patented spreadsheets delving into the nitty-gritty analytics of these performances before I make a decision on this.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:06 am to RollTide1987
If the chiefs defense held the eagles to 3 pts and the chiefs won 13-10 would that have been a great performance from Mahomes?
Or let’s say they lost 10-17 would that have not been a clunker?
Or let’s say they lost 10-17 would that have not been a clunker?
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:13 am to RollTide1987
He's dumb as a box of rocks.Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:25 am to lsupride87
quote:
If the chiefs defense held the eagles to 3 pts and the chiefs won 13-10 would that have been a great performance from Mahomes?
Or let’s say they lost 10-17 would that have not been a clunker?
Did Mahomes have a clunker against SF last year where he only scored 19 in regulation? Getting outscored by your kicker can't possibly be a good thing, right?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:32 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Umm, yeh, he did. The last two years they have completely relied on the defense
Did Mahomes have a clunker against SF last year where he only scored 19 in regulation
Which is why this entire idea of “let’s just judge a player that only sees the field 50% of the game” is dumb
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 9:33 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:35 am to lsupride87
quote:
Umm, yeh, he did. The last two years they have completely relied on the defense
Which is why this entire idea of “let’s just judge a player that only sees the field 50% of the game” is dumb
So he has clunkers 60% of the time while Brady only did 40% if we accept your definition of clunker. What are you arguing here exactly?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:In arguing the entirety of only judging these two QBs by team results is stupid as shite
So he has clunkers 60% of the time while Brady only did 40% if we accept your definition of clunker. What are you arguing here exactly?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:44 am to lsupride87
quote:
In arguing the entirety of only judging these two QBs by team results is stupid as shite
Ok. Brady is better by whatever metric you want to pick.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:45 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Well, except actual football stats, sure
Ok. Brady is better by whatever metric you want to pick.
I mean is Eli better than Brees?
That’s why this entire premise is dumb.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
Well, except actual football stats, sure
I mean is Eli better than Brees?
I really don't know why anyone wastes time on you. Let me guess, Brady was just a stat compiler.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:07 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
t me guess, Brady was just a stat compiler
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:09 am to lsupride87
You're all over the place. Why would Eli be better than Brees and what does that possibly have to do with Brady vs Mahomes?
Brady's career is better than and he's performed better in the biggest game. You said football stats say otherwise. Which ones?
Brady's career is better than and he's performed better in the biggest game. You said football stats say otherwise. Which ones?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News