- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/6/24 at 10:11 am to poncho villa
quote:
If you have 11 men on the field, you can't have more than 4 in the backfield meaning you have to have 7 on the los.
Jesus Christ.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:17 am to SteelerBravesDawg
Yes. My mistake. Thanks.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 12:07 pm to Legends2019
quote:
Only way it's not a legal play is if it was a pass.
Nope. The 2 end people on the line are always eligible. It's why you sometimes have random linemen having to report as eligible even when there is no chance they will go out for a pass.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 11/6/24 at 12:21 pm to poncho villa
You're right we are, because you told me I was a fricking moron for not knowing the rule. Turns out you're the fricking moron.
At least you finally conceded you don't know the rule.
At least you finally conceded you don't know the rule.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 2:15 pm to 62zip
you're still a fricking retard for using semantics as your main point.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 11/6/24 at 2:19 pm to 62zip
quote:
62zip
As officials, we both know that the guy you are responding to is one of those guys that after every play is screaming how we missed the call and "yOu'Re tErRiBlE!"when in reality, he wouldn't know a rulebook If one hit him square between the eyes.
It's always the most ignorant that scream the loudest
Posted on 11/6/24 at 8:42 pm to poncho villa
quote:
you're still a fricking retard for using semantics as your main point.
It's not semantics. I pointed out that you didn't know the rule and then made an arse of yourself. You should really be more careful about calling someone a fricking moron on a topic where they're right and you completely missed the mark. It's amazing your dumb arse is still trying to spin this.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 8:45 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
It's always the most ignorant that scream the loudest
Not to mention far too pussified to ever step on the field. The biggest pussies are the most vociferous.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 8:45 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
It's always the most ignorant that scream the loudest
***duplicate post***
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 11/6/24 at 8:45 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Offense can't have more than 11 and no more than 4 in the backfield.
How can you realistically have 11 on the line?
Posted on 11/6/24 at 9:15 pm to 62zip
Nope you’re a retard
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:27 pm to poncho villa
quote:
Nope you’re a retard
Go frick yourself. You're too fricking stupid to try and have a discussion with.
Get back to us when you learn to read.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 2:39 am to doubleb
Poor Ben is about to be replaced by a puppy named John that smells like cookies.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 2:07 pm to Ptguru21
quote:
Refs missed the call. RT was uncovered and therefore an ineligible receiver. Didn’t report as “eligible”. Would have bumped them out of FG range.
They had 2-3 downfield illegally the way they line up. That is what he was talking about...when they all went down field some of them weren't eligible...
Posted on 11/7/24 at 2:09 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
Incorrect.
Please explain
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:21 pm to doubleb
I read through this thinking someone would copy/paste the actual rule from the rule book, but nothing so far. It’s like arguing for pages about what the Bible says but not bothering to open and read it.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 9:19 am to Twenty 49
The problem is the actual rule and how the officials execute the enforcement of the rule look at 2 different things.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 9:34 am to Twenty 49
quote:
I read through this thinking someone would copy/paste the actual rule from the rule book
here you go:
quote:
Offensive Team Requirements—At the Snap
ARTICLE 4 Violation of each of the following (a-c) is a live-ball foul; the play is allowed to continue
a Formation. At the snap Team A must be in a formation that meets these
requirements:
1 All players must be inbounds
2 All players must be either linemen or backs (Rule 2-27-4, AR 7-1-
4-VIII)
3 At least five linemen must wear jerseys numbered 50 through 79
(Exception: When the snap is from a scrimmage kick formation, par
5 below)
4 No more than four players may be backs
and here is the definition of linemen and back:
quote:
Lineman and Back
ARTICLE 4 a Lineman
1 A lineman is any Team A player legally on their scrimmage line (Rule
2-21-2)
2 A Team A player is legally on the scrimmage line when facing their
opponent’s goal line with the line of their shoulders approximately parallel thereto and either (a) they are the snapper (Rule 2-27-8) or (b) their head breaks the plane of the line drawn through the waistline of the snapper
b Interior Lineman An interior lineman is a lineman who is not on the end of their scrimmage line
c Restricted Lineman A restricted lineman is any interior lineman, or any lineman wearing a number 50-79, whose hand(s) are below the knees
d Back
1 A back is any Team A player who is not a lineman and whose head
or shoulder does not break the plane of the line drawn through the waistline of the nearest Team A lineman
Posted on 11/8/24 at 9:36 am to Nutriaitch
quote:
4 No more than four players may be backs
so you can have a MAXIMUM of 4 backs, but there is no minimum requirement for backs.
well, somebody has to take the snap, so I guess technically you have to have at least 1.
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 9:36 am
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News