Started By
Message

re: Has college football basically slowly killed itself since Nebraska bolted for the Big Ten?

Posted on 7/22/21 at 8:07 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68701 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

Raise a glass to the BCS era, the true golden age.


It will go down as prob my favorite era of sports because I grew up during it and went to the school that got to two first, being a student during one.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27583 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:12 pm to
I'm not sure this works out the rosy way the SEC and Big 10 thinks it will. The only way this works long term is getting the West Coast teams to sign on and create a super league as well
Posted by KD Burner Account
Out of Bounds
Member since May 2019
1475 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

the following annual rivalries are all no more as a result of last decade’s realignment

quote:

Stanford vs USC


quote:

Michigan vs Michigan St



Solid post but both these teams are in the same division and still play every year

quote:

Texas vs Texas A&M



Also I've seen tradition being brought up when discussing new realignment when it would help bring this rivalry game back with Texas being in the SEC
Posted by HabaneroBuck
Up a ways.
Member since Oct 2020
1359 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Penn State announced they were joining the big ten in 1990 or so and ND rejected the Big Ten in 1998 or so. Those are the events that set things in motion.




Penn State, Notre Dame, BYU, and Miami were all independent juggernauts. It made sense back in those days for schools that were just good at football not to bother joining leagues outright. But, they saw the writing on the wall and knew that they had to align with someone, eventually. Notre Dame is the last big hold out, but they do have an agreement with the ACC.

Nebraska leaving a powerful conference was definitely a different animal, and what has it really gotten them? They are outsiders to the B1G, and not very successful ones, at that.

I agree that we are witnessing the slow death of CFB with the transfer portal, NIL, realignment, wokeness, 12-team playoffs, etc...
Posted by OKBoomerSooner
Member since Dec 2019
3127 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:00 am to
One of the big and undervalued reasons why the SEC has completely taken over college football has been its ability to maintain traditional rivalries and conference intrigue while still expanding and accommodating the realities of the modern game. You still have all the camaraderie and passion from back before CFB went corporate and national.
Posted by BradBallard
Wilmington, Delaware
Member since Jun 2020
355 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:01 am to
quote:

Adding UT to the SEC immediately reboots one of the most-played rivalry games in college football. UT and TAMU have played more games against each other than any two other teams in the SEC, and that's without having played in 10 years.


I would add to a lesser extent Texas and Arky.
Posted by BradBallard
Wilmington, Delaware
Member since Jun 2020
355 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:40 am to
quote:

Penn State, Notre Dame, BYU, and Miami were all independent juggernauts. It made sense back in those days for schools that were just good at football not to bother joining leagues outright. But, they saw the writing on the wall and knew that they had to align with someone, eventually. Notre Dame is the last big hold out, but they do have an agreement with the ACC. Nebraska leaving a powerful conference was definitely a different animal, and what has it really gotten them? They are outsiders to the B1G, and not very successful ones, at that. I agree that we are witnessing the slow death of CFB with the transfer portal, NIL, realignment, wokeness, 12-team playoffs, etc...


PSU started looking for a conference in the early 80’s. Rumor has it there were high level talks with OSU when they played in the 1980 Fiesta Bowl.

However, Paterno really wanted to form an all sports conference with eastern independents in the early 80’s. Think the old Big East football teams plus FSU, Army, Navy. I would imagine a deal would have been worked out with Notre Dame too. However, Big East Basketball ruled the roost at the time and Pitt and Syracuse thought basketball was the better bet from a money standpoint and the three schools couldn’t get on the same page. Basically, they didn’t want to carry PSU’s putrid basketball program, and PSU wanted a bigger share of football revenues due to their draw. PSU needed a home for its non football sports and talks with the Big Ten started.

Looking back, The Eastern Conference with the independents plus ND would have been a great conference. But, who knows what NCAA Basketball would have looked like. Think about this line up for rivalry week:

Army- Navy
Penn State- Notre Dame
FSU- Miami
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6375 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 7:47 am to
quote:


Deep South's Oldest Rivalry has been played 7 more times.



Fair enough. Must have overlooked it. But still, 7 more times against a game that hasn't been played in 10 years.

UT-TAMU is still a historic rivalry game.
Posted by LG2BAMA
Texas
Member since Dec 2015
1180 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:26 am to
Sooo college football now has

Players signing endorsement deals
Free agency
Only 30 teams playing each other

Sounds a lot like the nfl

I hate the nfl
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram