- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Greatest 3rd baseman of all-time
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:26 pm to Tiger in NY
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:26 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
He is the Nolan Ryan of hitters.

Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:29 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
sorry but Rose is overrated
Look at his career stats an get back to me. Look at runs scored and avg and doubles and triples and sdee where he rates all-time. And again we are talking about Charlie Hustle.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:29 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
So we only believe that players in the "steroid era" was guilty of using roids?
Or am I taking your comments completely off track?
Just looks to me as you're just scoffing at the notion that Boggs were ever on roids.
I said nothing about Boggs and roids. I was just recalling what he said about that season. Of course players in the 80's used roids. I don't think Boggs did. As has been pointed out already, the HR numbers were up tremendously that 1 particular year for the entire league, not just Boggs. I have no idea if he really ever used roids, but he surely didn't look the part.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:29 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I don't think Rose is THAT overrated, just because I don't think anyone thinks he is the greatest or anything.
Dude, he had no business being on that all-century team and there are people that go on about his hustle and drive or what ever. I think his bannishment has built up his legend.
He was obviously a very good player, but he was a singles hitter that hung around a (too) long time chasing a record.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:34 pm to dukke v
quote:
sorry but Rose is overrated
Look at his career stats an get back to me. Look at runs scored and avg and doubles and triples and sdee where he rates all-time
OK, he is tied for 171st in BA (.303), 211th in OBP (.375), 75th in triples. 1st in hits, 2nd in doubles, 6th in runs. He is 24th in extra base hits. An all time great? Sure, but more like top 20, rather than Top 3 as some like to put him.
This post was edited on 6/18/12 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:35 pm to H-Town Tiger
I never saw Rose in the 70's but in the 80's toward the end - he was always more image "good" then and sort of this ambassador - and when his career was winding down and he became the all-time hit king...nobody said..."now he's the greatest this and that..." it was simply, he had the all-time record - he stood for something and people liked him but he never stood for an all-timer at his position IMO. Sort of what happened with Cal Ripken in the 90's. No one is putting Ripken in the Top 3 of his position.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:37 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Dude, he had no business being on that all-century team
I don't disagree.
But he is one of the 35ish best players in the game's history.
I don't think THAT many people think he's top 10 or even top 20 really.
That's all I was saying.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:39 pm to OBUDan
quote:
But he is one of the 35ish best players in the game's history.
That means you basically think he's Top 3 or close all-time at his position.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:41 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
That means you basically think he's Top 3 or close all-time at his position.
Well he's top 30 in WAR.
He was a subpar defender.
He was a hits machine.
He played for a long arse time.
He's tough to quantify positionally because he played friggin' everywhere.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:41 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
That means you basically think he's Top 3 or close all-time at his position.
Not when his position is OF though.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:43 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
Just looks to me as you're just scoffing at the notion that Boggs were ever on roids.
I brought up 87 and i am in no way saying Boggs used steroid. I'm saying there is no way steroids could be the explaination for the offensive explostion in 1987. It wasn't just him Juan Samuel had a career high of like 12, hit 28 in 87. Unless everyone used for 1 year and quit, steriods can not explain 87.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:43 pm to OBUDan
Schmidt
Robinson ....this is the only debate in the history of 3rd base
i am too lazy to look it up , but didn't Brett move to 1st for 5 or 6 years
Robinson ....this is the only debate in the history of 3rd base
i am too lazy to look it up , but didn't Brett move to 1st for 5 or 6 years
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:45 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
An all time great? Sure, but more like top 20, rather than Top 3 as some like to put him.
I have never put him in the top three, and anyone who does IS a fool. Top twenty sounds right and NO way that makes him overated.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:45 pm to legba
George Brett played 460 of his 2200+ games at 1B. That is not much to me. I consider him a 3B. And I don't agree that there is no debate unless it only includes Schmidt and Brooks. George Brett and Eddie Mathews are very much in the argument, IMO.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:48 pm to OBUDan
quote:
He's tough to quantify
Agree with that...everything about his career.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:52 pm to TigerintheNO
Brooks Robinson was flat out amazing. He didn't have the power numbers but was an excellent clutch hitter and nobody was close to him defensively. The first time I saw him in person was 1965 and from then on I always wore #5.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:57 pm to double d
quote:
Brooks Robinson was flat out amazing
Yet another Flagshipper keeping his pimp hand strong.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 3:02 pm to double d

Posted on 6/18/12 at 3:03 pm to Baloo
quote:
Actually, I think Jackie Robinson is UNDERrated as a ballplayer. He’s looked at solely as this symbol when he is in the discussion for best 2B ever, save for his shortened career. He really was a five-tool player who could do it all. Speed, power, glove… the whole package.
First of all, I do believe Jackie is a Hall of Famer. So saying he is "overrated" is like saying a Coen Brothers movie sucks or something. Only relative to all other subjects.
Of course, his career started late. He probably would have had around 3,000 hits if he started at an earlier age.
I think the best part of his game was that he influenced the game in so many different ways, particularly on the base paths. He was playing Negro League baseball in the professional leagues.
He was definitely one of the most talented players in history.
It's just so difficult to evaluate. Maybe he would have posted even better numbers had he played for two decades instead of one. Or maybe he would get injured? I don't know. It's just tough to take 10 years of any player's career and tout them as one of the greatest of all time.
A lot of players, including several that aren't and won't be in the hall of fame, had 10-year stretches with numbers as impressive as his IMO. They all just played longer and thus fell off the planet.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 3:03 pm to wegotdatwood
quote:
Yet another Flagshipper keeping his pimp hand strong.
He never played for the Hogs.
Popular
Back to top
