Started By
Message

re: Florida State 35 @ Miami (FL) 43 Final - ESPN

Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Transparency on replay will soon be no more
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5585 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Why does it sound like the replay booth is talking to astronauts on the moon?
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10982 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
That defender absolutely lost control of the ball when he landed on his back and they completely ignore it
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70921 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Miami will play one ranked team this year and it's overrated ND. That should be a CFP elimination game.
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
5509 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
"we got a body part". We're just making it up as we go.
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
9535 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
I'm not going to comment on that last play because the play before was a TD and the holding call was absolute fricking nonsense. FSU should be going for 2 to tie.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
43395 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Receiver had both hands on the ball by the time he hit the ground and the DB had lost control of it
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
151438 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
TheOcean and Corso
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
57237 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:00 pm to
Looked like the ball ended on the helmet/body of the receiver and the defenders arms go somewhat limp
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
6162 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Double fricked refs didn’t even know about double possession. Never mentioned it


That audio review was pretty damnimg. They basically started with the conclusion and just kept agreeing thats what it was. No actual review or discussion. It felt rushed and predetermined
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70921 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

That defender absolutely lost control of the ball when he landed on his back and they completely ignore it


Complete nonsense. That was simultaneous possession at its clearest. TD FSU
Posted by DMagic
2x Super Bowl Champs
Member since Aug 2010
51832 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
It’s all kayfabe at this point
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20268 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
No one clearly had possession and the original call of an INT could not be overturned based on the replay.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
10751 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Receiver had both hands on the ball by the time he hit the ground and the DB had lost control of it


I thought a tie ball always goes to the offensive player.
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:01 pm to
Why did they rush the review? They usually take their time in calm voices. This was a hoax
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:02 pm to
Not to mention that horseshite holding
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70921 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

thought a tie ball always goes to the offensive player.

It does. The (incorrect) call on the field screwed FSU.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37538 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Transparency on replay will soon be no more


It was weird how they didn’t even talk about simultaneous possession at all. If they had called TD on field they would t have been able to overturn it
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:03 pm to
They didn’t even mention possibility of dual possession. Probably don’t even know about it
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20268 posts
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

It was weird how they didn’t even talk about simultaneous possession at all. If they had called TD on field they would t have been able to overturn it

Right, but they called an INT and could not overturn it.

Based on the replay, whatever the call on the field was would have to be upheld.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram