- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/12/15 at 11:53 am to Tiger1242
I know, I'm just stirring the pot. But, there are a few fools over on Talk Tennis board that are pounding the idea that a guy cannot be the GOAT if he doesn't have a winning record against his biggest rivals.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 11:54 am to lsupride87
quote:
Roddick is a nobody? If it wasn't for fed he would have about 6-7 grand slam titles. For a while Fed was the only person on the planet who could stop Andy at Wimbledon
Roddick lost 3 Wimbledon and a U.S. Open to Fed. He was never winning 6-7
Posted on 7/12/15 at 11:56 am to thewarmth
quote:
Roddick lost 3 Wimbledon and a U.S. Open to Fed. He was never winning 6-7
He also lost to Fed in the QF and SF of a couple slams... Without Federer, Roddick wins 6-8.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 11:58 am to Tiger1242
Djokovic is beating a Federer who is 34. He's going to end up with the better head to head because of these wins late in Fed's career. Fed got Nole his fair share of times. He beat Novak in 2011 at Roland Garros, which was Novak's best season. Got him at Wimbledon in 2012. They've both won twice a piece in their primes at the U.S. Open.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:01 pm to QuackAttack716
I feel like Federer has hurt his resume the last three years, according to some posters. He's given a lot of wins to his rivals. If he had just retired, his head-to-head records would be better and he would still have the same amount of majors.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:02 pm to SwaggerCopter
If people can't realize how amazing Fed has been in his 30s they are just pure retards that should lose their right to vote.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:12 pm to SwaggerCopter
Which his ridiculous. His longevity and age should be celebrated, not admonished. He's playing far better than Sampras or Agassi at this age. Playing the best ever for his age, to be honest
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:15 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:
I feel like Federer has hurt his resume the last three years, according to some posters. He's given a lot of wins to his rivals. If he had just retired, his head-to-head records would be better and he would still have the same amount of majors.
I don't even kow how to respond to this
The dude is playing elite tennis at 33. He just played like shite today against the best player in the world
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:46 pm to QuackAttack716
Was Pistol Pete even playing at 33?
Agassi won Aussie at 32 IIRC.
Agassi won Aussie at 32 IIRC.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 12:46 pm to jimithing11
quote:
I don't even kow how to respond to this
The dude is playing elite tennis at 33. He just played like shite today against the best player in the world
I was pointing out what posters were doing. I don't agree with it. It's like penalizing LeBron for losing in the Finals.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:22 pm to sms151t
Was anyone at Federer's age ranked no.2 in the world?
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:26 pm to QuackAttack716
No they were ranked number 1
Andre Agassi was ranked 1 at age 33
But to be fair ATP didn't rank players until 73. So Laver may have been also.
Andre Agassi was ranked 1 at age 33
But to be fair ATP didn't rank players until 73. So Laver may have been also.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:28 pm to sms151t
Damn that's pretty legit. I've been watching tennis since 99-00 but it completely slipped my mind that Agassi was ranked no.1 at that age. I was only 10 years old then but I remember Hewitt, Roddick, Pat Rafter, and Marat Safin being the big guns with a Goran Ivanesevic Wimbledon victory splashed in and Gustavo Kuerten winning RG, moreso than I do Agassi as a no.1
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:33 pm to sms151t
Pete's ranking tanked in his final years, didn't it? Won the 02 U.S. open, but not as a top 10 player, from what I remember
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:35 pm to QuackAttack716
Sampras and Agassi both won one last grand slam. Doesn't look like Fed will be able to.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 1:59 pm to QuackAttack716
It slipped once he got married to Bridget and stopped playing the events other than GS
Now that's how I remember it, he played the big events only.
I'm sure Bobby Ray or Bunk will correct me
Now that's how I remember it, he played the big events only.
I'm sure Bobby Ray or Bunk will correct me
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 7/12/15 at 2:37 pm to sms151t
Agassi did have the luxury of taking two years off to do blow, meth, and celebrities. Prolly helped save his legs for a little later 
Posted on 7/12/15 at 2:38 pm to lsupride87
Things you gotta do to be an All Iranian-American
Posted on 7/12/15 at 2:46 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Sampras and Agassi both won one last grand slam. Doesn't look like Fed will be able to.
A lot of people considered that 2012 Wimbledon.
Page 7 of 13
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News