- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Definitive picture for the 4th down play
Posted on 1/27/25 at 5:23 pm to Dale Murphy
Posted on 1/27/25 at 5:23 pm to Dale Murphy
I agree it was a bad play call. The line judge on the Bills side saw that Allen was right even with him. The one on the Chiefs side saw it play out after he was pushed back but forward momentum should have been awarded. Just another shady thing about refs and Chiefs.
The play before should have been ruled a first down. Don't understand why it was not reviewed or challenged.
The play before should have been ruled a first down. Don't understand why it was not reviewed or challenged.
2
Posted on 1/27/25 at 5:55 pm to lsupride87
Back.....and to the left. Back.....and to the left. Back.....and to the left.
This conspiracy will surpass the JFK assassination before it's all said and done.
Chiefs haters' tears = nectar of the Gods
This conspiracy will surpass the JFK assassination before it's all said and done.
Chiefs haters' tears = nectar of the Gods
Posted on 1/27/25 at 5:57 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
Don't understand why it was not reviewed or challenged.
It was reviewed. Replay ruled that the call stood as called.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 5:59 pm to KosmoCramer
He is talking about the 3rd down play
Replay assist overturned a bills first down earlier
Replay assist overturned a bills first down earlier
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:03 pm to KosmoCramer
Not the 4th down play. The previous play where the TE caught the pass and was tackled. Looked like the ball was on the 40. Instead they marked it short and Buffalo ran a quick play. Someone should have alerted the coach to challenge
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:05 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
I agree it was a bad play call. The line judge on the Bills side saw that Allen was right even with him. The one on the Chiefs side saw it play out after he was pushed back but forward momentum should have been awarded. Just another shady thing about refs and Chiefs.
The line judge on the bills side line had absolutely no view of the ball. Only thing that ref could see is the number 95. The ref on the Chiefs side had the least obstructed view. He the entire collision.
Shady would have been taking the spot of the ref who had almost no view of thee play.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:05 pm to MasterKnight
Gotcha
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:06 pm to gdzgft28
quote:
The ref on the Chiefs side had the least obstructed view. He the entire collision.
How do you know he was unobstructed? Is there a view of that?
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:08 pm to VermilionTiger
Anyone have a picture of that? I missed it cooking.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
How do you know he was unobstructed? Is there a view of that?
I posted the video and pride posted a screenshot a page or so ago. You even replied to the picture.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:12 pm to gdzgft28
Looks to me that he never saw the ball at the critical moment because he's blocked by Allen's body and helmet. Neither of them really saw it, they were guessing.
The ref that marked him short did actually see his body, but not the ball.
The ref that marked him short did actually see his body, but not the ball.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
At this point you just have to say the refs missed it It happens.
It happens a lot with KC. Kind of like they made a defensive holding call against Philly. Penalty (allegedly) occurred at the LOS/15 yard line and a flag was not thrown until the pass was clearly over Ju-Ju’s head in the end zone.
Comically bad officiating or NFL is predetermined like wrestling and fans are in denial.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:17 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Looks to me that he never saw the ball at the critical moment because he's blocked by Allen's body and helmet. Neither of them really saw it, they were guessing.
Maybe read what I wrote.
I said he had the least obstructed view. The other ref couldn’t see anything because jones was obstructing his entire view. He had no idea where the ball was. The ref that marked him short saw far more of the play than the one who marked it 1st down.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:21 pm to gdzgft28
They both couldn't see the ball, they were equally blocked to the only relevant factor.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:24 pm to lsupride87
Now show us how they left points on the field multiple times, as they lost by only 3.
Also, please sketch out the Chiefs blitz on 4th and 5 and show us how the refs pressured Josh, and caused the receiver to drop a well thrown ball.
Also, please sketch out the Chiefs blitz on 4th and 5 and show us how the refs pressured Josh, and caused the receiver to drop a well thrown ball.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:26 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
They both couldn't see the ball, they were equally blocked to the only relevant factor.
lol… no it’s not… someone had to make the call… the other guy could see nothing… the ref who marked him short saw the entire play.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:26 pm to everytrueson
I haven’t once blamed the refs for the loss 
I will never understand when a person can’t just admit when a clearly bad call was made
Like this, the ravens PI call in the bills favor was awful
I will never understand when a person can’t just admit when a clearly bad call was made
Like this, the ravens PI call in the bills favor was awful
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:31 pm to gdzgft28
If neither of them saw the ball, they had equally blocked views.
It's a flawed system. They should have it set up for situations like this(no one actually saw the maximum forward progress of the ball), they go to the replay but dont have to have indisputable evidence but make a decision based on the preponderance of the video evidence (if they more than likely than got the line to gain or not).
It's a flawed system. They should have it set up for situations like this(no one actually saw the maximum forward progress of the ball), they go to the replay but dont have to have indisputable evidence but make a decision based on the preponderance of the video evidence (if they more than likely than got the line to gain or not).
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:33 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
They both couldn't see the ball, they were equally blocked to the only relevant factor.
This is really, really, really simple. The call had to be made. The couldn’t just do it over. They weren’t equally blocked. One ref clearly had a better view of what occurred than the other. The ref with the better view should make the call.
The ref that marked it a first couldn’t tell you who made the tackle much less where the ball was.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 6:37 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
they go to the replay but dont have to have indisputable evidence but make a decision based on the preponderance of the video evidence
And that’s a terrible idea.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News