Started By
Message

re: Definitive picture for the 4th down play

Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:12 am to
Posted by Rabbs and QStick
Texas
Member since Apr 2012
3011 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Shakir also had the first down on the prior play that even made it a 4th down


Interesting take considering Shakir didn't make that catch.

ETA: This board is clearly full of retards with the 43 upvotes to that post. That catch was made by Kincaid not Shakir
This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 7:20 am
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36920 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Jomboy did a great breakdown.

sorry can't embed it the NFL is blocking it.

LINK


best views yet of two clear first downs not called due to refs completely guessing and looking like doofuses just zig zagging while running in

Jomboy makes a good point about how “what’s the protocol”, is it truly just whatever ref gets to the ball first gets to spot it even when two refs have completely different spots?
This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 7:35 am
Posted by Rabbs and QStick
Texas
Member since Apr 2012
3011 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:27 am to
You cut the top picture off. It used to be clearly at angle when you could see the lines on the field at bottom of picture. If you have not doctored that picture, it would be clear that it is at angle and makes him appear further right than he actually is.
Posted by Rabbs and QStick
Texas
Member since Apr 2012
3011 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:45 am to
I truly don't know who's a dumber poster from this shite. You and Boosie are in contention for worst posters of 2025 with this stance.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60724 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Shakir also had the first down on the prior play that even made it a 4th down
this was my biggest peeve looked like a clear miss
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37675 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Jomboy did a great breakdown. sorry can't embed it the NFL is blocking it. LINK

That really ends the debate.
Posted by ks_nola
Bozeman
Member since Sep 2015
736 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 1:46 pm to
explain this... after the long pass that was ruled a catch kc ran 4 plays with no penalties, no first down yet it was never 4th down which may have caused them to kick a fg instead of getting the TD. straight from espn play by play

3rd & 5 at BUF 29
(3:13 - 2nd) (Shotgun) P.Mahomes pass deep right to X.Worthy to BUF 3 for 26 yards (C.Bishop) [D.Smoot].Penalty on BUF-D.Hamlin, Defensive Holding, declined.Buffalo challenged the pass completion ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands. (Timeout #1.)

1st & Goal at BUF 3
(2:48 - 2nd) X.Worthy right end to BUF 3 for no gain (G.Rousseau). ** Injury Update: KC-K.Hunt has returned to the game.

1st & Goal at BUF 3
(2:49 - 2nd) (Shotgun) P.Mahomes pass incomplete short right to D.Hopkins. ** Injury Update: KC-K.Hunt has returned to the game.

2nd & Goal at BUF 3
(2:47 - 2nd) (Shotgun) Direct snap to I.Pacheco. I.Pacheco left end to BUF 1 for 2 yards (K.Elam; J.Phillips).

3rd & Goal at BUF 1
(1:55 - 2nd) P.Mahomes scrambles right end for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.PENALTY on BUF-J.Phillips, Unnecessary Roughness, 8 yards, enforced between downs. H.Butker extra point is GOOD,
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36920 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 2:40 pm to
the first play didn’t count because Buffalo challenged the play … but refs didn’t stop it in time so we all saw the play fully through the tackle. It shouldn’t be in the scorebook
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108546 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 2:49 pm to
You can definitively see the ball and the line to gain in this angle

Can’t wait for more gaslighting from rabb and rb10

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Notice how the computer drawn white line is way in front of the actual 40 yard line here? That is compensating for the angle. Yall get it?

This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 2:54 pm
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9567 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

quote:

Shakir also had the first down on the prior play that even made it a 4th down
Interesting take considering Shakir didn't make that catch.

ETA: This board is clearly full of retards with the 43 upvotes to that post. That catch was made by Kincaid not Shakir


It seems very likely they are just agreeing with the main point that the Bills got the first down on the prior 3rd down play. Who caught it matters less than if it was a first down or not in context of post and thread.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80031 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Notice how the computer drawn white line is way in front of the actual 40 yard line here? That is compensating for the angle. Yall get it?


We've always known that was what you were trying to do. But how do you justify putting it right there? Why not higher? Geometry? Show your work.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108546 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:33 pm to
That is drawn from a computerized CAD system. Don’t like it? Tell Steve Jobs
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170702 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

this point you just have to say the refs missed it

It happens.

Sure. It's just pathetic to get it wrong with the benefit of replay. Could have very well changed the outcome of the game.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80031 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:36 pm to
How does the computerized CAD system determine where that line goes? Is it manually entered or is AI used? What are the parameters?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108546 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:41 pm to
Tell me exactly how a calculator works? Your computer? Etc etc. How can we be sure the video images of nah replay are correct?

To answer your question I beleive it’s called perspective warp and it’s a very elementary process that pretty much any system can run with ease
This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 3:43 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80031 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:42 pm to
Did you manually enter the line via the program? If not, what input did you add to get it to spit out that line?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108546 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Did you manually enter the line via the program? If not, what input did you add to get it to spit out that line?
Its not manual
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108546 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:43 pm to
It’s an algorithm as simple as a calculator adding 2+2
This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 3:44 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80031 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Its not manual


Then what is it?

I buy the down the line shot, the other line seems arbitrarily drawn honestly. They would need specific details about the placement of the camera in relation to the ball to make those determinations.

If that is some sort of accurate AI, CAD generated representation, why wouldn't the NFL use it?
Posted by WhoDat9090
Member since Oct 2019
1666 posts
Posted on 1/28/25 at 3:46 pm to
Because the NFL wants to be able to alter the outcome of the game if necessary
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram