- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Caitlin Clark has proven to be crucial to the WNBA, so her absence will be painful
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:04 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:04 pm to TackySweater
quote:
“The reason we watching women’s basketball is not just because of one person. It’s because of me too. I want y’all to realize that. It’s not just cause of one person.”
Are there more delusional athletes than black WNBA Queens "who built this league" and "that's why you watch".... thx, for telling us!
They hate Clark because she brings fans that don't live in, nor celebrate the WNBA Alphabet/BLM agenda bubble.
Clark has exposed the League, shown the players their " actual value" which varies wildly from their delusional perceived value.
"You're racist for not worshiping me"....
WNBA has spent 30 years trying to guilt trip the public into watching this awful product, then a player comes along that fans find interesting and exciting and the League tries to kill her because she shifts the false narrative.
0
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:18 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
Brennan is Clark obsessed and thinks the league should lower flags to half mast because Caitlin will miss a few weeks.
Well the article didn’t say that and neither did op, but sure keep creating things in your head lol
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:20 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
No, I think she meant it and I agree with her that there are many other players worthy of that kind of recognition.
Who? Who else has single-handedly led to this big of attendance and viewership ratings increases?
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:21 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
before she should be considered a superstar. She could develop into one, but she's not there just yet.
Can you list out the current superstars? And give us your definition of superstar?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:22 pm to TX Tiger
Two from you:
So wait. What’s your argument?
She’s not a superstar?
Or
She’s not the best player in the league?
You’re jumping all over the place lol
quote:
She isn't anywhere near the best player in the league. She arguably isn't even the best guard in the league.
quote:
before she should be considered a superstar. She could develop into one, but she's not there just yet.
So wait. What’s your argument?
She’s not a superstar?
Or
She’s not the best player in the league?
You’re jumping all over the place lol
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
She set the ALL-TIME record for turnovers last season. She leads the league this season in turnovers. What exactly am I ignorant about seeing?
So now stats DO tell the whole story?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:25 pm to SirWinston
quote:
From what I've seen, at least 40% of her "turnovers" are perfect passes that are so damn good that her bumbling teammates have never experienced them before and aren't expecting the ball in that place or at that moment.
She led the league in turnovers by over 63% last season
that's more turnovers than your average pegging session. 
Posted on 6/1/25 at 2:54 pm to TackySweater
quote:As I've already stated, nobody is arguing that Clark has led to the ratings increase.
No, I think she meant it and I agree with her that there are many other players worthy of that kind of recognition.
Who? Who else has single-handedly led to this big of attendance and viewership ratings increases?
My point is, there are many players at least as good as Clark. So why is she singled out and getting all the attention? There must be other reasons.
As the article I posted indicates, I'm not the only one with that question.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:00 pm to TackySweater
quote:Well, I'm a pretty tough grader. The two CURRENT players I would consider superstars are Napheesa Collier and A'ja Wilson.
before she should be considered a superstar. She could develop into one, but she's not there just yet.
Can you list out the current superstars? And give us your definition of superstar?
My definition of a superstar is a player who's skills are consistently above and beyond the rest of the league.
There are a ton of outstanding players as well. I would put Clark in that category of which there are maybe 20-30. Where she ranks among that group is debatable.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:00 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
. So why is she singled out and getting all the attention? There must be other reasons.
Because she has lead to MASSIVE tv ratings and attendance number increases. How are you this confused lol
Also she is the best women’s college basketball player of all time, one year removed from college. And let’s say you don’t agree she is the best college player ever, she’s certainly too 5. This isn’t that hard, unless you’re just trying to create a narrative, which clearly you are doing.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:04 pm to TackySweater
quote:Yes, but WHY has she led to massive tv ratings and attendance number increases. That's the question.
. So why is she singled out and getting all the attention? There must be other reasons.
Because she has lead to MASSIVE tv ratings and attendance number increases. How are you this confused lol
quote:
Also she is the best women’s college basketball player of all time
You've admittedly never watched a single game. How the frick would you know if she's good or bad?
quote:Oh the irony.
you’re just trying to create a narrative, which clearly you are doing.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:04 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
The two CURRENT players I would consider superstars are Napheesa Collier and A'ja Wilson.
So there are only two superstars in the entirety of the wnba? lol
If so, you’ve just admitted how mediocre the league is lol
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:05 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Yes, but WHY has she led to massive tv ratings and attendance number increases. That's the question.
That’s the question for anyone that’s looking for off the court reasons, like you.
I just told you why she’s led to these massive increases and you hurried your head up your arse and said, “welllllll it must be for non basketball reasons”
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:09 pm to TackySweater
quote:
NCAA
No. 22 retired by Iowa Hawkeyes[15][16]
2-time AP Player of the Year: 2023, 2024[17]
2-time Honda Sports Award winner: 2023, 2024[18][19]
2-time Honda-Broderick Cup winner: 2023, 2024[20][21]
2-time Naismith College Player of the Year: 2023, 2024[22]
2-time John R. Wooden Award winner: 2023, 2024[23]
2-time Wade Trophy winner: 2023, 2024[24]
2-time Ann Meyers Drysdale Award winner: 2023, 2024[25]
3-time Nancy Lieberman Award winner: 2022, 2023, 2024[26]
3-time Dawn Staley Award winner: 2021, 2022, 2023[27]
4-time First-team USBWA All-American: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024[28]
4-time WBCA All-American: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024[29]
3-time unanimous First-team All-American: 2022, 2023, 2024
3-time First-team AP All-American: 2022, 2023, 2024[30]
Tamika Catchings Award winner[a]: 2021[31]
WBCA Freshman of the Year[a]: 2021[32]
Second-team AP All-American: 2021[33]
2-time NCAA Final Four All-Tournament Team: 2023,[34] 2024[35]
3-time NCAA Division I scoring leader: 2021, 2022, 2024[36]
3-time NCAA Division I assists leader: 2022, 2023, 2024[37]
2-time NCAA Division I three-point leader: 2023, 2024[citation needed]
Let's talk about what she doesn't have that Angel Reese does
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:10 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
You've admittedly never watched a single game. How the frick would you know if she's good or bad?
There are lots of articles about how she’s top 5 best womens college basketball players of all time.
You like articles don’t you? You keep talking about the one you posted.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Let's talk about what she doesn't have that Angel Reese does
Ok
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:11 pm to chalmetteowl
championship was a team effort
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:11 pm to TackySweater
quote:Yes, not everyone can be a superstar.
So there are only two superstars in the entirety of the wnba? lol
quote:And yet despite never having ever watched a single game, you still insist on posting in every thread about a mediocre league.
you’ve just admitted how mediocre the league is lol
I'm curious to know what possesses you to do so?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:13 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
And yet despite never having ever watched a single game, you still insist on posting in every thread about a mediocre league.
That’s irrelevant. You keep bringing that up like it’s a big gotcha lol. Who cares.
You watch the games and yet you get drug in all the threads about it lol
quote:
Yes, not everyone can be a superstar.
Ok lol. Two superstars in the entire league
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 3:15 pm to TackySweater
quote:Well, no, that's the question for people who have actually watched the games and understand the situation. As the article clearly states, I'm not the only one asking.
Yes, but WHY has she led to massive tv ratings and attendance number increases. That's the question.
That’s the question for anyone that’s looking for off the court reasons, like you.
quote:I'm supposed to take the word of someone who's never seen one single WNBA game?
I just told you why she’s led to these massive increases
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News