- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Browns wanted Wright over Weeden, told McCoy they wouldn't draft first-round QB
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:33 am to bomber77
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:33 am to bomber77
Colt will be traded tonight.
The only thing I dont like is that we could have had him at 37. David Decastro would have come in and started from day 1 at a position of much higher need.
If they dont take a WR at 37 they are dumb as hell.
The only thing I dont like is that we could have had him at 37. David Decastro would have come in and started from day 1 at a position of much higher need.
If they dont take a WR at 37 they are dumb as hell.
2
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:34 am to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Tampa obviously needed a RB and could have very easily moved up an taken him.
Schefter said the Bucs had no plans on trading up to 3. The Browns got taken.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:37 am to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
They're O-line is very good,
the frick? outside joe thomas that is a very avg oline. they should have taken zeitler or decastro over weeden.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:41 am to rocket31
When in doubt, never select a Big 12 quarterback. Trading up one spot for a panic pick also seems pretty silly. Hell, even if Richardson gets taken at #3, take Kalil or Blackmon instead. You need EVERYTHING, why focus on the RB, which is the NFL fungible good?
I don't get it. I would give them the benefit of the doubt, but the Browns have never given me any reason to do so. I'm just happy they are in the Ravens' division.
I don't get it. I would give them the benefit of the doubt, but the Browns have never given me any reason to do so. I'm just happy they are in the Ravens' division.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:44 am to Baloo
quote:
I don't get it. I would give them the benefit of the doubt, but the Browns have never given me any reason to do so. I'm just happy they are in the Ravens' division.
The Cleveland Browns are literally the Baltimore Orioles of the NFL. They're so poorly run, it's unbelievable. At least they have a hands-off owner who's willing to let his football people do their job but that doesn't really mean much when he keeps picking the wrong people to run the team.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:46 am to Unbiased Bama Fan
Holmgren and Heckart are doing fine. They have owned the last 2 drafts.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:48 am to Baloo
Minnesota came out smelling like roses. Trade down, gain three picks and still get the player you want in Kalil.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 10:57 am to Rickety Cricket
1. The Browns essentially have up a fourth round pick which has some solid value. Eventhough guys like Colston and Brady were drafted in the super late rounds. They are constantly just thrown in picks in trades.
2. The Weeden pick was from the Falcons stupid trade for Julio Jones. So they took him probably a little early to keep some other team from moving up to take the next best QB.
They will probably end up with Randle or Hill. They will have accomplished exactly what they needed which were skill players on offense.
2. The Weeden pick was from the Falcons stupid trade for Julio Jones. So they took him probably a little early to keep some other team from moving up to take the next best QB.
They will probably end up with Randle or Hill. They will have accomplished exactly what they needed which were skill players on offense.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:31 pm to Truculent Typist
quote:
First they give up a 4th, 6th & 7th Round Draft Picks to move up one spot & pick a player that was going to be there at their next pick anyway (Minnesota bluffed them something fierce). And, even though Richardson is a Great RB, he's still just a RB & it's just plain unnecessary to use a #3 pick on any RB in today's NFL.
They were not worried about Minnesota drafting Richardson!
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:34 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Weeden sucks. He's ugly and old and dumb. Good luck with him as the "face" of your franchise. Boring as hell.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:36 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Schefter said the Bucs had no plans on trading up to 3. The Browns got taken.
Even if they do - big deal. You'd be "forced" to take the best LT in the draft to anchor your OL for the next decade. Wow thats a terrible option.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:37 pm to MinnesotaTiger
Excellent analysis. Do you have a blog I could subscribe too?
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:41 pm to MinnesotaTiger
quote:
He's ugly and old and dumb.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 12:41 pm to MinnesotaTiger
quote:
Weeden sucks. He's ugly and old and dumb. Good luck with him as the "face" of your franchise. Boring as hell.
Now I see why people dislike your posts.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 1:02 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Colt will be traded tonight.
I won't mind seeing all of the little kids in Austin have to shelve their Browns #12 jerseys next to the Titans #9 jerseys they shelved just last year.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 1:17 pm to SwatMitchell
quote:
Colt will be traded tonight.
quote:
Cleveland Browns general manager Tom Heckert said that he would consider trading quarterback Colt McCoy, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
“It’s something we’ll talk about tonight and tomorrow,” Heckert said when asked if he would try and move the third year quarterback.“
We got a new quarterback that’s going to be with us,” head coach Pat Shurmur said. “Tonight is about Brandon Weeden, not about the competition.”
its been fun Colt
LINK
This post was edited on 4/27/12 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 4/27/12 at 1:20 pm to RLDSC FAN
What the frick? Colt is a third year player? That sounds wrong even though it isnt
Posted on 4/27/12 at 2:29 pm to MinnesotaTiger
quote:
Even if they do - big deal. You'd be "forced" to take the best LT in the draft to anchor your OL for the next decade. Wow thats a terrible option.
quote:
MinnesotaTiger
This is some sweet stuff here. fricking gem!
Posted on 4/27/12 at 2:39 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
I don't think getting Weeden was all that bad a move b/c I think Colt doesn't have the arm for the NFL.
however, to go from saying their are getting a WR to help their current young QB to instead drafting his replacement b/c the WR they wanted was gone makes it seem like they don't have much of a long term plan in place.
however, to go from saying their are getting a WR to help their current young QB to instead drafting his replacement b/c the WR they wanted was gone makes it seem like they don't have much of a long term plan in place.
This post was edited on 4/27/12 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 4/27/12 at 2:57 pm to Dr RC
Hill and Randle still on the board bro. They get one of them, they drafted the skill players they desperately needed on offense
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News