- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Big 10 Revenue Share Agreement
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:52 pm to theballguy
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:52 pm to theballguy
quote:It's a very poorly written contract.
Standard contract. If your conference isn't doing this, you're doing it wrong.
Many of the clauses violate the law, and thus, are unenforceable.
What good is a contract if it doesn't give you any remedies for breach?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
You mean the time he was going nothing and a cop pulled a gun on him and went through his pockets?
No I mean the time your critical race theory dumbass believed his lies about being harassed and fondled by cops and spent months defending his honor on this message board.
quote:
I know you probably would blow the cop after treatment like that.
Look at how angry you are about koy moore not acknowledging your attempts to let him peg you.
quote:
Because again, bootlicker
Find a single post, “lawyer”
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:56 pm to Adam Banks
I mean we already knew that when they let Pedo State remain a member.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:58 pm to SammyTiger
Big 10 are the biggest elitist fart sniffers in the country
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:05 pm to TT
Why is that bad? Most of us in the past have had some form of non-compete in a contract we’ve signed
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:07 pm to Salviati
Why don’t they just cap salary and make them sign 2-3 year deals?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:44 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:Who is the "they" that is going to cap salaries?
Why don’t they just cap salary and make them sign 2-3 year deals?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:02 am to DaleGribblesMower
quote:
Why is that bad? Most of us in the past have had some form of non-compete in a contract we’ve signed
And those are almost always limited
by state law.
We continuously try and apply a different standard to these college
athletes than we do normal workers.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:31 am to DaleGribblesMower
quote:
Why is that bad? Most of us in the past have had some form of non-compete in a contract we’ve signed
And courts have found many provisions of non-competes unenforceable. Generally, a contract must be balanced in terms of what each party gets in order to be considered enforceable. This isn’t just taking the contract as a whole, but individual claises or sections as well. If a section of the contract is unenforceable legally, then it’s *possible* the entire contract is invalid. In reality that is rarely the case because boilerplate contract language includes a severability clause which says if any section of the contract is unenforceable, only that section is void, the rest of the contract is still valid.
In the case of these contracts coming from the Big 10 (or what we have seen of them anyway), the contracts seem very one sided in favor of the schools. I don’t think they will be enforceable in whole. Some sections may be valid and enforceable, but there will almost certainly be some sections thrown out if one of these cases ever gets to court.
I don’t think it’s a matter of the Big 10 or the schools’ attorneys being bad attorneys and drafting bad contracts. I think it’s done intentionally knowing that they will get away with it initially until it goes to court. When it goes to court, they may lose a particular case but it forces the whole system to be brought under some control, which I think people want. However until those guardrails are in place, every school and conference will do whatever they think they can get away with.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 12:43 pm to BR Tiger
Popular
Back to top


1





