- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Best Jobs In CFB
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:07 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:07 pm to USMC Gators
Bama.
/thread
No other job includes deification
/thread
No other job includes deification
0
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:09 pm to USMC Gators
I'd take Alabama, Oklahoma, ND, Michigan, Oregon, and Arkansas over A&M.
ETA: and Auburn
ETA: and Auburn
This post was edited on 9/4/12 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:16 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
A&M
spot reading here
maybe just justifying a potential loss this weekend
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:20 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
spot reading here
maybe just justifying a potential loss this weekend
They're a big boy program in the state of Texas.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:21 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Not including Notre Dame and Alabama in that kind of makes me think you don't know what you're talking about.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:22 pm to TN Bhoy
Reading comprehension is your friend.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:24 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
They're a big boy program in the state of Texas.
big boy programs win games they were a middle of the pack Big 12 team and will most likely be the same in the SEC
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:25 pm to Tornado Alley
I think if you're looking prospectively, then past accomplishments shouldn't be the main factor. It's a factor sure, but if you're talking pure potential then it should limited. College football is full of once great programs like Minnesotta or Army that have won a lot but you wouldn't put on this list.
That said, Bama and ND should both be on the list.
That said, Bama and ND should both be on the list.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I mean if you include 2 schools from TX and 2 from Florida you have to include 2 from Cali. No reason UCLA should suck as bad as they do.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:36 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
No reason UCLA should suck as bad as they do
Their administration puts absolutely nothing into that program
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:38 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
I mean if you include 2 schools from TX and 2 from Florida you have to include 2 from Cali. No reason UCLA should suck as bad as they do.
Considering now that UCLA ponies up the cash with the new Pac 12 network deal.
Jim Mora - five-year deal worth approximately $12 million plus bonuses.
Before USC was paying the 3 million and UCLA was paying the 1 million.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:38 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
I dont see how bama isnt listed name sells it self.
Clearly given the level of success and recruiting done by guys like Mike DeBose and David Shula.
quote:
Notre Dame and Alabama don't have to recruit nationally. Their name alone usually recruits for them.
Notre Dame is in NW Indiana, if they don't recruit nationally they would be Purdue. If the name sells it self, why have they been basically irrelevent since the mid 90's?
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
List of the absolute best:
Bama
ND
tOSU
Texas
UF
LSU
Bama
ND
tOSU
Texas
UF
LSU
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:40 pm to Carson123987
quote:
List of the absolute best:
Bama
ND
tOSU
Texas
UF
LSU
I think add USC and I agree with you
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:41 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
Reading comprehension is your friend.
They aren't on your list.
This post was edited on 9/4/12 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:42 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
I'd take Alabama, Oklahoma, ND, Michigan, Oregon, and Arkansas over A&M.
ETA: and Auburn
And not Texas, Ohio State or USC? Really or am I missing something?
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:44 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
If the name sells it self, why have they been basically irrelevent since the mid 90's?
ND has been to 3 BCS bowls, so while I dont think anyone is claiming today that they are an elite program or even fared well in the those games. . The "irrelevant" talk is largely overblown. Also, ND went 10-2 in 2003 and got denied a BCS bowl opportunity
This post was edited on 9/4/12 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:47 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
big boy programs win games they were a middle of the pack Big 12 team and will most likely be the same in the SEC
and people with a brain would realize that things can and do change. Prior to 2000, LSU was an historically 2nd tier program that was basically garbage. What would you have said if someone preducted a team that had 8 losing seasons in the previous 11, that had not won a conference title (not that that matters anymore apparently) since 1988 and had 1 NC in 1958, would be the first to win 2 BCS titles?
I don't know if A&M will ever be more than what they've been. but the do have all the necessary ingredients to be an elite program.
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:47 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
Mainly because these programs don't have to recruit nationally.
You're putting WAY too much emphasis on this. You really think that A&M would be able to sway coaches over the likes of Oklahoma, Michigan, Notre Dame, Alabama, etc?
Posted on 9/4/12 at 12:50 pm to VABuckeye
The programs he listed didn't make the OP's list.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News