- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
BCS has achieved consensus on 4-team seeded playoff.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:35 pm
@McMurphyCBS: BCS has achieved consensus on 4-team seeded playoff.
SIAP
SIAP
13
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:36 pm to blzr
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:39 pm to blzr
Will be interesting to see the details of this.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:40 pm to blzr
All conference champions?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:40 pm to blzr
conference champs or no champs?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:42 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
conference champs or no champs?
Conference champs unless Bama, Texass, FU, Southern Cal, or Notre Dame is a wild card. Those teams get a mulligan if ranked in the top 16.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:42 pm to Wrestler171
Brett McMurphy ?@McMurphyCBS
Slive wouldn't disclose whether BCS group prefers top four ranked teams or conference champion model
Slive wouldn't disclose whether BCS group prefers top four ranked teams or conference champion model
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:48 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Conference champs unless Bama, Texass, FU, Southern Cal, or Notre Dame is a wild card. Those teams get a mulligan if ranked in the top 16.
Was just coming in here to type something similar. Though if "FU" refers to UF, I don't think we have to worry about that any time soon.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:50 pm to Starchild
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:53 pm to Starchild
The more I think about it the more I like the Conference Champs idea because it basically means if we win the SEC we win the whole thing
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:53 pm to blzr
Da playoffs are upon us .... 
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:56 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Still like my plan
8 Team Playoff
4 Conference Champions
4 At Large
Conference Champions
Conference Champion #1
Conference Champion #2
Conference Champion #3
Conference Champion #4
At large #1
At large #2
At large #3
At large #4
First Round at Conference Champion's stadium
Game 1 #4 AL @ #1 CC
Game 2 #3 AL @ #2 CC
Game 3 #2 AL @ #3 CC
Game 4 #1 AL @ #4 CC
Game 1 Winner vs Game 4 Winner
Game 2 Winner vs Game 3 Winner
National Championship
Football Four at BCS Bowls
National Championship at random BCS Bowl or Stadium
8 Team Playoff
4 Conference Champions
4 At Large
Conference Champions
Conference Champion #1
Conference Champion #2
Conference Champion #3
Conference Champion #4
At large #1
At large #2
At large #3
At large #4
First Round at Conference Champion's stadium
Game 1 #4 AL @ #1 CC
Game 2 #3 AL @ #2 CC
Game 3 #2 AL @ #3 CC
Game 4 #1 AL @ #4 CC
Game 1 Winner vs Game 4 Winner
Game 2 Winner vs Game 3 Winner
National Championship
Football Four at BCS Bowls
National Championship at random BCS Bowl or Stadium
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:02 pm to dawgfan24348
this whole thing is bullshite. I do like your 8 team scenario. That would leave less room for controversy. top 4 is crap, What about #5? I cant stand Boise St but what happens if they are at the #5 spot undefeated? they have a reason to cry. Thy are basing this off of last year and the way it played out. The only true way I feel is a 30 or 32 team play off. No mulligans, No coaches politicking on national TV for votes, no team of the century playing 0 ranked opponents and getting in for one game with 6 weeks to prepare. its all left on the field.
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:04 pm to nosaj56
quote:
Via multiple sources, commissioners prefer a selection committee that picks "best four," emphasizes but not requires conference champions.
Wow, a selection committee for 4 teams? That will be interesting to say the least.
ETA: If they wanted to choose the one way playoffs could cause more controversy than the BCS, they have done it IMO
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:05 pm to nosaj56
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:06 pm to coonass27
quote:
this whole thing is bullshite. I do like your 8 team scenario. That would leave less room for controversy. top 4 is crap, What about #5? I cant stand Boise St but what happens if they are at the #5 spot undefeated?
What about #9
Whatever the cut-off number is there will be some bitching.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:06 pm to nosaj56
quote:Good
@slmandel Via multiple sources, commissioners prefer a selection committee that picks "best four," emphasizes but not requires conference champions.
The conference champion requirement is idiotic.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:07 pm to nosaj56
quote:
@slmandel Via multiple sources, commissioners prefer a selection committee that picks "best four," emphasizes but not requires conference champions.
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 6:08 pm to blzr
no fricking way
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News