Started By
Message

re: Baseball CWS Finals appearances since 2000.

Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:00 am to
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
35519 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:00 am to
Skip had the good fortune to build his program at a time most schools, and even the NCAA, didn't really give much of a shite about college baseball. He also timed it perfectly to achieve MAXIMUM interest from the LSU fan base. For much of the existence of it history LSU baseball was a DISTANT third (if that) behind football. Then, Bertman made LSU a juggernaut at a time football entered its worst stretch in decades (maybe ever) and basketball began to severely underachieve and eventually decline in to anonymity. LSU fans wanted something to feel proud of and baseball was it.

Since that time though MANY schools in the SEC, and regionally, have invested much more in the sport. The scholarship limitations have hurt LSU's prior advantage and the TOPS advantage has been reduced to some extent. Now, that's not to say LSU can't and shouldn't be a premier program in the nation (they certainly sink more money into the program than most), but the reality is it will be hard for ANY coach to duplicate what Skip did in the 90's. The sport and national landscape of CBB has changed dramatically since that time.

Admittedly, I'm not a huge college baseball fan. And it does seem a bit of apathy has started to settle in right now with the program. But I also think the level of REASONABLE expectations for LSU fans probably need to be adjusted as well. It is VERY unlikely any coach can achieve that 90's level of success again. For Skip it was one of those "right guy, right place, right time" moments.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
55754 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:05 am to
And they got very lucky with Skip because I don't think any AD at LSU outside of Broadhead would have made that move.

Plus Bertman had many chances to leave LSU for both college and professional opportunities during the penny pinching Joe Dean era
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42533 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I see a trend.



Skip and Smoke(with teams largely put together by Skip) have most of the appearances. After that LSU hasn’t dominated, and neither has anyone else.

On the national scene guys make runs, but none have had the staying power that Skip had.

Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13735 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:15 am to
It is time to move on from CPM and really for CPM to move on from LSU as well. I think both parties are just ready for the next thing, but Skip himself has said he wouldn’t be able to duplicate his success in today’s college baseball.

Of course he would have still done better than CPM. Skip is a top 2 or 3 coach in the history of the sport. He would more than likely do better at every major program in the country than the current coach.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30934 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:25 am to
quote:

But we’d be better off and probably with a couple more titles wouldn’t you think.

Better off, yes, just because he was great. How many more titles is a tough hypothetical given his age, the limited amount of time he was around the new format, etc. In two of his three years in the super regional format he lost to another SEC team and Tulane in the supers (and won #5 in the other). He also never coached in the current CWS finals format and bracket play was condensed into fewer days. And obviously that doesn’t even get into the new park or the way the game has changed in general (bats, roster/scholarship restrictions, etc.)

There’s no doubt he would have adapted and continued to win at a high clip, but it’s difficult to say how many finals appearances and championships that would translate to.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42533 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:48 am to
quote:


Better off, yes, just because he was great. How many more titles is a tough hypothetical given his age, the limited amount of time he was around the new format, etc. In two of his three years in the super regional format he lost to another SEC team and Tulane in the supers (and won #5 in the other). He also never coached in the current CWS finals format and bracket play was condensed into fewer days. And obviously that doesn’t even get into the new park or the way the game has changed in general (bats, roster/scholarship restrictions, etc.)

There’s no doubt he would have adapted and continued to win at a high clip, but it’s difficult to say how many finals appearances and championships that would translate to.


All true.

Remember too in his heyday LSU could buy a home regional.
You can’t do that anymore,

Playing a six team regional at hone every year was a big advantage. If you won that you went to Omaha. It wasn’t easy, the competition was tough as was the losers bracket, but helped the home team.
Posted by Boudin and Beers
Georgia
Member since Oct 2019
72 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I see a trend.



That college baseball has gotten more competitive since the 90s?

Realistically most schools didn't put much thought into their baseball programs. LSU in the 90s showed a school could bolster a baseball program and make money on the sport.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10884 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 9:56 am to
quote:

The scholarship limitations have hurt LSU's prior advantage


what advantage did LSU ever have in this area?
most Skip ever had available was 13 schollys (same as everyone else in country).
and the 11.7 went into effect early 90s, so 4 of his titles were won under current limits.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87961 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:03 am to
quote:

That college baseball has gotten more competitive since the 90s?

Realistically most schools didn't put much thought into their baseball programs. LSU in the 90s showed a school could bolster a baseball program and make money on the sport.
It’s interesting that this is the narrative. There were plenty of schools who took baseball seriously before LSU won. Skip isn’t who put college baseball on the map. And he wasn’t the first to prove it could be a money making sport. Although he did perfect it in many ways.

Also, people see parity when no single team dominates. I see a missed opportunity for domination. It’s like Bama and Saban don’t exist to yall. Everyone puts money in football. Nearly everyone makes money on the sport. Yet Bama dominates. How??? There’s no reason a school could not have dominated college baseball the last two decades.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30934 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:05 am to
The way those scholarships are divided up has definitely changed and roster limits were also implemented after he retired.

ETA: Bertman himself has mentioned the impact of this several times in the past, it isn’t just speculation.
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 10:08 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87961 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:09 am to
Roster limits and no minimum gave coaches more flexibility. He took advantage of it better than anyone. But it was a rule for everyone not just LSU. Skip was very good at making the most out of what he was given whether it be the system or the players themselves.
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13735 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:11 am to
quote:

what advantage did LSU ever have in this area?
most Skip ever had available was 13 schollys (same as everyone else in country).
and the 11.7 went into effect early 90s, so 4 of his titles were won under current limits.


Roster limitations and only allowing you to give scholarships to 28 players is what created more parity in college baseball.
Posted by Rosenblatt
Member since Apr 2019
6294 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:13 am to
Exactly

Everyone played under the same rules. These folks trying to rationalize mediocrity are sad
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30934 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Also, people see parity when no single team dominates. I see a missed opportunity for domination. It’s like Bama and Saban don’t exist to yall. Everyone puts money in football. Nearly everyone makes money on the sport. Yet Bama dominates. How??? There’s no reason a school could not have dominated college baseball the last two decades.

From 1970 to 2000 7 programs won 27 of the 31 national championships. You can argue that it isn’t any more difficult to win one now, but it wouldn’t be supported by any factual evidence and virtually no one in coaching would agree with it.

And that’s not even getting into how poor the comparison to football is. You shouldn’t need anyone to point out how baseball results are far more random than football.

ETA: Correction, 8 programs won 27 of the 31 titles from 70-00.
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 10:29 am
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42533 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:29 am to
quote:


It’s interesting that this is the narrative. There were plenty of schools who took baseball seriously before LSU won

There were some who took baseball seriously, but there are way more now that millions have flowed into athletic departments from tv dollars.


quote:

And he wasn’t the first to prove it could be a money making sport[/quotE

Who else made money?



[quote] There’s no reason a school could not have dominated college baseball the last two decades.


Sure there’s a reason. College baseball lacks a Saban, and it also has a very big competitor for elite talent. Saban doesn’t recruit against the NFL. College baseball coaches have to compete against MLB for talent.

Think about it. To dominate you have to have elite talent, Coaching kids up can only get you do far. Finding diamonds in the tough can only get you do far. In football you can get the best of the best. You seldom do that in college baseball.

The chances a Saban emerges in college baseball are there, but even a Saban is not going to convince elite talent on a regular basis to forgo millions of dollars on a regular basis do he can stockpile talent like you can in football.

That is one readon that you don’t see a John Wooden in hoops. He didn’t compete with thd NBA for Alcindor, Goodrich and Walton.

But we all know PM isn’t a Saban, Skip or Wooden. No one else is either.



This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 10:34 am
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:32 am to
And in the 19 seasons that followed (2001-2019), there have been 14 different programs win national titles.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42533 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:36 am to
quote:


Exactly

Everyone played under the same rules. These folks trying to rationalize mediocrity are sad


All universities follow the same rules, but all sports don’t follow the same rules and that differentiates one sport from another.
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13735 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 10:57 am to
quote:

There’s no reason a school could not have dominated college baseball the last two decades.


The reason is there isn’t a Saban like coach in college baseball. Saban is the greatest coach in the history of college football and is not only better than everyone else currently in his sport he is head and shoulders better than everyone else. Not saying it can’t happen but there just isn’t that guy right now and may never be.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87961 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Roster limitations and only allowing you to give scholarships to 28 players is what created more parity in college baseball.
This parity bullshite is way way overblown. I did a breakdown from the 80s, 90s, 00s, and 10s of teams that made it to the CWS.

To summarize:

80s (29 teams, 13 single appearance, 14 3+ appearances)
90s (30 teams, 12 single appearances, 15 3+ appearances)
00s (32 teams, 13 single appearances, 13 3+ appearances)
10s (35 teams, 16 single appearances, 15 3+ appearances)

So all of this crazy, unbelievable parity resulted in 6 more teams going to the CWS and everything else remaining nearly the same. A few more teams had just 1 appearance. And the number of teams making 3 or more appearances over a decade remained flat.

Here's the full list:

80s (29 teams, 13 single appearance)

Alabama - 1
Arizona - 3
Arizona State - 5
Arkansas - 3
California - 2
Cal State Fullerton - 3
Clemson - 1
Florida - 1
Florida State -4
Fresno State - 1
Georgia - 1
Hawaii - 1
Indiana State - 1
James Madison - 1
LSU - 3
Long Beach State - 1
Loyola Marymount - 1
Maine - 5
Miami - 8
Michigan - 4
Mississippi State -2
New Orleans - 1
North Carolina - 1
Oklahoma State - 7
South Carolina -3
Stanford - 5
St. John’s - 1
Texas - 7
Wichita State - 3

90s (30 teams, 12 single appearances)

Alabama - 3
Arizona State - 3
Auburn - 2
California - 1
Cal State Fullerton - 5
The Citadel - 1
Clemson - 3
Creighton - 1
Florida - 3
Florida State - 7
Fresno State - 1
Georgia - 1
Georgia Southern - 1
Georgia Tech - 1
Kansas - 1
Long Beach State - 3
LSU - 7
Miami - 7
Mississippi State - 3
Oklahoma - 3
Oklahoma State - 4
Pepperdine - 1
Rice - 2
Southern Cal - 2
Stanford - 4
Texas - 3
Texas A&M - 1
Tennessee - 1
UCLA - 1
Wichita State - 4

00s (32 teams, 13 single appearances)

Arizona - 1
Arizona State - 3
Arkansas - 2
Baylor - 1
Cal State Fullerton - 6
Clemson - 3
Florida - 1
Florida State - 2
Fresno State - 1
Georgia - 5
Georgia Tech - 2
ULL - 1
Louisville - 1
LSU - 5
Miami - 5
Mississippi State - 1
Nebraska - 3
North Carolina - 4
Notre Dame - 1
Oregon State - 3
Rice - 5
San Jose State - 1
South Carolina - 3
Southern Cal - 2
Southern Miss - 1
Southwest Missouri State - 1
Stanford - 5
Tennessee - 2
Texas - 6
Tulane - 2
UC Irvine - 1
Virginia - 1

10s (35 teams, 16 single appearances)

Arizona - 2
Arizona State - 1
Arkansas - 4
Auburn - 1
California - 1
Cal State Fullerton - 2
Clemson - 1
Coastal Carolina - 1
Florida - 7
Florida State - 4
Indiana - 1
Kent State - 1
Louisville - 3
LSU - 3
Miami - 2
Michigan - 1
Mississippi State - 3
North Carolina - 3
NC State - 1
Oklahoma - 1
Oklahoma State - 1
Ole Miss - 1
Oregon State - 3
South Carolina - 3
Stony Brook - 1
TCU - 5
Texas - 3
Texas A&M - 2
Texas Tech - 4
UC Irvine - 1
UCLA - 3
UC Santa Barbara - 1
Vanderbilt - 4
Virginia - 3
Washington - 1
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30934 posts
Posted on 5/5/21 at 11:03 am to
quote:

The reason is there isn’t a Saban like coach in college baseball.

I don’t think you can say that with any certainty. A Saban equivalent in baseball isn’t going to win the exact same number of championships as Saban in football due to the nature of the sport. Maybe 30-40 years ago the baseball equivalent could have, but not now that the college game and results more closely resemble real baseball. Corbin may well be the Saban equivalent and the run he is on could be what “dominating” now looks like.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram